Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9.2-incubating release

2015-10-05 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi incubator, Mark forwarded the vote at the beginning of dev@ vote. Therefore it sounds to me we don't need to vote again on these binaries. Can you confirm it please? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Github

Re: Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9.2-incubating release

2015-10-05 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
@Marvin: right for source/binary, sorry for this miswording Think we should graduate soon yes, just one of us needs to take time to do it. Then I consider the vote done and will finish the release Thanks guys! 2015-10-05 7:29 GMT-07:00 John D. Ament : > I don't believe

Re: Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9.2-incubating release

2015-10-05 Thread John D. Ament
I don't believe that to be the case. You guys are mature enough, why not graduate? On Oct 5, 2015 10:06 AM, "Romain Manni-Bucau" wrote: > Hi incubator, > > Mark forwarded the vote at the beginning of dev@ vote. Therefore it sounds > to me we don't need to vote again on

Re: Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9.2-incubating release

2015-10-05 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
understood it hasnt been clear enough in Mark's mail but still matches the incubator policy. If not we can do the same vote with the same votes, not a big deal. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Github

Re: Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9.2-incubating release

2015-10-05 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 8:50 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > I'm not sure that matches what we are saying. It matches what I was saying -- I think the thread was (barely, arguably) within the letter of Incubator policy and thus it's not necessary to run another vote. But it

Re: Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9.2-incubating release

2015-10-05 Thread John D. Ament
I'm not sure that matches what we are saying. On Oct 5, 2015 10:34, "Romain Manni-Bucau" wrote: > @Marvin: right for source/binary, sorry for this miswording > > Think we should graduate soon yes, just one of us needs to take time to do > it. > > Then I consider the vote

Re: Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9.2-incubating release

2015-10-05 Thread John D. Ament
I'm fine either way. Could the podling forward their result at least with the IPMC binding votes listed? On Oct 5, 2015 11:58, "Marvin Humphrey" wrote: > On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 8:50 AM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > I'm not sure that matches what we

Re: Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9.2-incubating release

2015-10-05 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
the +1 bindings listed in the result were the ipmc votes, ie: - Mark - Justin - Daniel - and me Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Github | LinkedIn