On Aug 7, 2006, at 12:49 PM, Kim van der Riet wrote:
I have been somewhat surprised at the amount of debate surrounding the
name of the proposed Glasgow project.
Same here, and I've been on this alias for over a year. Most of the
discussion earlier has been over infringement issues, not
a
On 8/7/06, Kim van der Riet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have been somewhat surprised at the amount of debate surrounding the
name of the proposed Glasgow project. It seems that this project has
become entangled in an issue overdue for discussion within Apache.
Perhaps the emotive issue of using
That's right!
adffaces "solved" the naming during the incubation (still ongoing;))
But... you should note that the code donation came from Oracle,
so no "naming issues" (on adf faces) on this side.
I am not really sure what happens when you call your incubation
project "vista" or "netweaver" fo
Kim,
I am not an Incubator PMC member, but past experience over the last
few months shows that the name is not a barrier to entry for the
Incubator.For example, ADFFaces is an incubating project with a
name trademarked by Oracle, and part of the incubating process has to
been to change that n
I have been somewhat surprised at the amount of debate surrounding the
name of the proposed Glasgow project. It seems that this project has
become entangled in an issue overdue for discussion within Apache.
Perhaps the emotive issue of using (another) proper noun has sparked a
much-needed debate. I
