On 10/30/2011 8:05 PM, David Crossley wrote:
Benson Margulies wrote:
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Thinking out load: perhaps just promote the project into a TLP, while
having a few IPMC members volunteer to become PMC members of the new TLP
and provide oversight?
Yup. No muss, no fuss, no new
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 2:50 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 10/30/2011 8:05 PM, David Crossley wrote:
Benson Margulies wrote:
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Thinking out load: perhaps just promote the project into a TLP, while
having a few IPMC members volunteer to become PMC
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 12:55:01PM +0100, Jukka Zitting wrote:
To me this suggests that our current three state transitions [1] from
the podling phase -- termination, continuation and graduation -- may
need some adjustment. That could mean introducing new exit strategies
or relaxing the
Two quick comments, haven't read the context:
Marvin Humphrey wrote on Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 10:26:57 -0700:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 12:55:01PM +0100, Jukka Zitting wrote:
To me this suggests that our current three state transitions [1] from
the podling phase -- termination, continuation and
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Two quick comments, haven't read the context:
Marvin Humphrey wrote on Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 10:26:57 -0700:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 12:55:01PM +0100, Jukka Zitting wrote:
To me this suggests that our current three
Benson Margulies wrote on Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 15:33:25 -0400:
Could the incubator, or a clone of the incubator, serve as a permanent
home for small projects? Essentially, this amounts to removing all the
'incubator' disclaimer and branding requirements for these projects,
and retaining the
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Benson Margulies wrote on Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 15:33:25 -0400:
Could the incubator, or a clone of the incubator, serve as a permanent
home for small projects? Essentially, this amounts to removing all the
'incubator'
Benson Margulies wrote:
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Thinking out load: perhaps just promote the project into a TLP, while
having a few IPMC members volunteer to become PMC members of the new TLP
and provide oversight?
Yup. No muss, no fuss, no new mechanisms.
Good solution. Presume that the
