1) PPMC must vote for the release according to their rules (which
should at least match the 3 +1 / majority rule requirements)
2) at least one PMC member must vote +1 (usually the mentor)
Well.. let's call this the expedited form of release. It leaves the
PPMC a bit more self-sufficient.
Leo Simons wrote:
Here's what I understand:
1) Apache rule: all apache releases must be made by PMCs
2) Apache rule: a release needs at least 3 binding +1s and more +1s than -1s
3) from #1 and #2 it follows that all incubator releases must be made
by the incubator PMC
If you see a way
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 04:07, William A. Rowe, Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
Here's what I understand:
1) Apache rule: all apache releases must be made by PMCs
2) Apache rule: a release needs at least 3 binding +1s and more +1s than -1s
3) from #1 and #2 it follows that
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 04:07, William A. Rowe, Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
Here's what I understand:
1) Apache rule: all apache releases must be made by PMCs
2) Apache rule: a release needs at least
I like Leo's proposal. With PMC members mentoring multiple projects, it
is really a burden to try and get 3 votes for a release.
Shanti
Leo Simons wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 04:07, William A. Rowe, Jr.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:22, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
...
The IPMC is in charge of its operation. It can redefine the rules of
releases as it pleases. The three +1 rule was developed to show that
the PMC is in
Greg Stein wrote:
The IPMC is in charge of its operation. It can redefine the rules of
releases as it pleases. The three +1 rule was developed to show that
the PMC is in charge of the release, and is therefore legally liable
for it. The IPMC can do whatever it likes around releases, as long
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 13:11, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Greg Stein wrote:
The IPMC is in charge of its operation. It can redefine the rules of
releases as it pleases. The three +1 rule was developed to show that
the PMC is in charge of the release, and is therefore
(i'm really short of time ATM so apologies in advance if i'm very slow
to respond)
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 13:11, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
Greg Stein wrote:
The IPMC is in charge of its operation. It
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Justin Erenkrantz jus...@erenkrantz.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote:
Also, to be clear, as an IPMC member I spend quite a bit of time with
projects where I am not a mentor, casting (binding) votes on things
like
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:16, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote:
...
Not merit, just binding vote. I agree that it sucks, but it is not
something where the incubator has gone awry, it has _always_ been
messed up like this.
Here's what I understand:
1) Apache rule: all apache releases must
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:16, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote:
...
Not merit, just binding vote. I agree that it sucks, but it is not
something where the incubator has gone awry, it has _always_ been
messed up like this.
12 matches
Mail list logo
