On 13 March 2016 at 01:25, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:11 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 7 March 2016 at 01:46, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>> To close a loop on this: based on the consensus I created a public
>>> version of the tools under:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/comdev
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:11 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 7 March 2016 at 01:46, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> To close a loop on this: based on the consensus I created a public
>> version of the tools under:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/comdev/tools/licensing/
>>
>> My attempts of preserving the hist
On 7 March 2016 at 01:46, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> To close a loop on this: based on the consensus I created a public
> version of the tools under:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/comdev/tools/licensing/
>
> My attempts of preserving the history weren't successfully since
> private and public
To close a loop on this: based on the consensus I created a public
version of the tools under:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/comdev/tools/licensing/
My attempts of preserving the history weren't successfully since
private and public are two different SVN repos (you can't just svn cp/mv).
I don'
Christopher wrote on 2/4/16 7:25 PM:
> It might be relevant that that both of those tools appear to be licensed
> under ASL 2.0, which explicitly permits redistribution (presumably outside
> the private area?). I would think it confusing to have an open source
> license on software which is expecte
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 11:24 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 5 February 2016 at 00:14, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> a podling recently asked me why:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/relicense/
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/tools/copy2license.pl
>> are o
On 5 February 2016 at 00:14, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> a podling recently asked me why:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/relicense/
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/tools/copy2license.pl
> are only available to commiters. I see
> no reason why, but
It might be relevant that that both of those tools appear to be licensed
under ASL 2.0, which explicitly permits redistribution (presumably outside
the private area?). I would think it confusing to have an open source
license on software which is expected to remain private, or otherwise
restricted
Hi!
a podling recently asked me why:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/relicense/
https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/tools/copy2license.pl
are only available to commiters. I see
no reason why, but of course I'm appreciative
of the warning here:
https://svn.ap
