RE: Notes on branding

23:58:09 -0600 > Subject: Re: Notes on branding > To: general@incubator.apache.org; dennis.hamil...@acm.org > > Changes made to the trafodion website: > > 1. Moved disclaimer text to about section rather than in footer. > 2. Added disclaimer to latest version of documentation.

Re: Notes on branding

tter if there was a link as part of the Incubator >> mention. >> >> http://incubator.apache.org in both cases seems good enough. >> >> No voting required. >> >> - Dennis >> >> > -Original Message- >> > From: Ted Dunning [mai

Re: Notes on branding

acm.org > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > On the other hand, it would be great were the Apache Incubator image > > > > linked to something better than http://trafodion.apache.org [;<). > > > > > > > > As a general observation, the fi

Re: Notes on branding

> http://incubator.apache.org in both cases seems good enough. > > > > No voting required. > > > > - Dennis > > > > > -----Original Message- > > > From: Ted Dunning [mailto:ted.dunn...@gmail.com] > > > Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 00:05 > > &g

Re: Notes on branding

al Message- > > From: Ted Dunning [mailto:ted.dunn...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 00:05 > > To: general@incubator.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Notes on branding > > > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Gunnar Tapper <tapper.gun...@gmail.com> &

RE: Notes on branding

ttp://incubator.apache.org in both cases seems good enough. No voting required. - Dennis > -Original Message- > From: Ted Dunning [mailto:ted.dunn...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 00:05 > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Notes on branding > > On

Re: Notes on branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Gunnar Tapper wrote: > FYI, "Apache Trafodion" is part of the logo. I'm not putting the project > through another round of voting on that one. :) > Wouldn't suggest that either. What I was noting was that the text above the log and the

Re: Notes on branding

Thanks Ted. FYI, "Apache Trafodion" is part of the logo. I'm not putting the project through another round of voting on that one. :) It strikes me that the left (or right) part of a project's web site menu could contain "Apache Incubator Project" as a standard. Such an approach wouldn't impede

Re: Notes on branding

Gunnar, Think that page looks pretty good (not referring to the standards, just looking at the page). Having the word incubator near the logo might be slightly nicer, but that isn't such a big deal since you have that on the project name just above the logo and you have the Incubator logo in the

Re: Notes on branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Tim Williams wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:43 PM, John D. Ament wrote: >> Mike, >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:12 PM Mike Jumper wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Gunnar

Re: Notes on branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 5:39 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Some notes, but again only my opinion. > > <3 > > My only nit pick with the disclaimer placement is that its even below your > normal footer. The more appropriate place is the about section on the home > page. My

Re: Notes on branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:43 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Mike, > > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:12 PM Mike Jumper wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Gunnar Tapper >> wrote: >> >> > Let me offer up a concrete example

Re: Notes on branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:38 PM Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 8:47 PM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:19 PM Greg Chase wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Marvin Humphrey

Re: Notes on branding

Mike, On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:12 PM Mike Jumper wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Gunnar Tapper > wrote: > > > Let me offer up a concrete example since I struggle with the issue of > > branding:

Re: Notes on branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 8:47 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:19 PM Greg Chase wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Marvin Humphrey > > > wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Greg Chase

Re: Notes on branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Gunnar Tapper wrote: > Let me offer up a concrete example since I struggle with the issue of > branding: http://trafodion.apache.org/documentation.html > > I chose the following approach based on input from out mentor Stack: > > - Added

Re: Notes on branding

Some notes, but again only my opinion. On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 6:44 PM Gunnar Tapper wrote: > Let me offer up a concrete example since I struggle with the issue of > branding: http://trafodion.apache.org/documentation.html > > I chose the following approach based on

Re: Notes on branding

Let me offer up a concrete example since I struggle with the issue of branding: http://trafodion.apache.org/documentation.html I chose the following approach based on input from out mentor Stack: - Added (incubator) to the menu bar - Added the incubator logo on the top of the page - Placed the

Re: Notes on branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:16 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 4:52 PM Greg Chase wrote: > > > > > > > This email encrypted by tiny buttons & fat thumbs, beta voice > recognition, > > and autocorrect on my iPhone. > > > > > On Jul 1, 2016,

Re: Notes on branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 4:52 PM Greg Chase wrote: > > > This email encrypted by tiny buttons & fat thumbs, beta voice recognition, > and autocorrect on my iPhone. > > > On Jul 1, 2016, at 1:41 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 4:35

Re: Notes on branding

This email encrypted by tiny buttons & fat thumbs, beta voice recognition, and autocorrect on my iPhone. > On Jul 1, 2016, at 1:41 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 4:35 PM Tim Williams wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:05

Re: Notes on branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 4:35 PM Tim Williams wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Marvin Humphrey > wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Greg Chase wrote: > > > >> The branding guidelines do not address feedback such as

Re: Notes on branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Greg Chase wrote: > >> The branding guidelines do not address feedback such as "logo in footer" or >> "disclaimer is buried deep or below the fold". > > Incubation

Re: Notes on branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:47 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:19 PM Greg Chase wrote: > > ... > > > > Spirits can be hard to grasp. As I suggested before. If being > > prescriptive is too difficult, then force new podlings into a >

Re: Notes on branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:19 PM Greg Chase wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Marvin Humphrey > wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Greg Chase wrote: > > > > > The branding guidelines do not address feedback such as

Re: Notes on branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Greg Chase wrote: > > > The branding guidelines do not address feedback such as "logo in footer" > or > > "disclaimer is buried deep or below the fold". > >

Re: Notes on branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Greg Chase wrote: > > > The branding guidelines do not address feedback such as "logo in footer" > or > > "disclaimer is buried deep or below the fold". > > What

Re: Notes on branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Greg Chase wrote: > The branding guidelines do not address feedback such as "logo in footer" or > "disclaimer is buried deep or below the fold". Incubation disclaimers are intended to be substantive. They are not CYA legal boilerplate that

Re: Notes on branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:35 PM Greg Chase wrote: > Thanks for doing the audit. > > The Geode PPMC has noted the finding in the wiki with our site. > > However, we'd like to see a good example of a compliant website. > > The branding guidelines do not address feedback such as

Re: Notes on branding

On 2016-07-01 07:37 (-0700), Shane Curcuru wrote: > > In particular, any feedback on our published policies/guidelines is very > important. As we scale, we need to ensure that most podlings can figure > out the right thing to do from the docs, and not as much from

Re: Notes on branding

Thanks for doing the audit. The Geode PPMC has noted the finding in the wiki with our site. However, we'd like to see a good example of a compliant website. The branding guidelines do not address feedback such as "logo in footer" or "disclaimer is buried deep or below the fold". Considering

Re: Notes on branding

John D. Ament wrote on 6/29/16 7:36 AM: > Hey guys > > I'm starting to go through the podlings to identify branding issues. > Touched the first 12 projects, for those that had websites, 4 were not > within branding requirements. > > I'm not sure if other scan give a hand here on contacting

Re: Notes on branding

John, It seems to me you just defined a (potential) solution direction. Best regards, Pierre On Friday, July 1, 2016, John D. Ament wrote: > Its definitely an option, once we have a clear sign in place. Just don't > forget, clutch isn't magic. Unless we build some

Re: Notes on branding

Its definitely an option, once we have a clear sign in place. Just don't forget, clutch isn't magic. Unless we build some smarts that can visit the podling page, look at the webpage and see if the incubator logo are present, its going to be based on a flag in podlings.xml. I can actually think

Re: Notes on branding

Hi John, All, My suggestion is to improve the incubator clutch, so that the overview http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html reflects whether podlings are: 1. Compliant with ASF Branding regulations 2. Compliant with ASF Incubator Branding regulations. Best regards, Pierre Smits

Re: Notes on branding

All, As a follow up to this. I've started tracking a wiki page with the results of the audit. You can find it here: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BrandingAuditJune2016 There's two things I want to get out of this. - Agreement on our branding. It seems like there's some notion that our

Re: Notes on branding

Hi John, Thanks for keeping up the good work and being adamant/unwavering regarding the branding aspects visavis the podlings. Best regards, Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM OFBiz based solutions & services OFBiz Extensions Marketplace http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ On Wed, Jun

Notes on branding

Hey guys I'm starting to go through the podlings to identify branding issues. Touched the first 12 projects, for those that had websites, 4 were not within branding requirements. I'm not sure if other scan give a hand here on contacting podlings, but I went through Airflow -> Fineract, and