FYI all budding Woden release managers ... a vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
may be unnecessary ...
On 11/29/06, Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/24/06, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, just to make sure I understand it now, even tough we might have three +1
IPMC binding
Apologies, wrong list.
On 11/30/06, Jeremy Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI all budding Woden release managers ... a vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
may be unnecessary ...
On 11/29/06, Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/24/06, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, just to
On 11/24/06, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, just to make sure I understand it now, even tough we might have three +1
IPMC binding votes in the podlign dev-list, we would still have to run a
voting thread on this list and wait for three +1 IPMC biding votes ?
No. You should just
So, just to make sure I understand it now, even tough we might have three +1
IPMC binding votes in the podlign dev-list, we would still have to run a
voting thread on this list and wait for three +1 IPMC biding votes ?
On 11/22/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/22/06,
Yes Jeremy, this is my understanding as well...
If we get the three IPMC +1 votes on Tuscany devlist, we could do something
simmilar to this thread :
http://www.mail-archive.com/general%40incubator.apache.org/msg11681.html
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
On 11/21/06,
Ah, it is all making sense to me now. Thanks for the clarification as I
learn the incubator ways! :-)
- Dan
On 11/22/06, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes Jeremy, this is my understanding as well...
If we get the three IPMC +1 votes on Tuscany devlist, we could do
something
On 11/22/06, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes Jeremy, this is my understanding as well...
If we get the three IPMC +1 votes on Tuscany devlist, we could do something
simmilar to this thread :
http://www.mail-archive.com/general%40incubator.apache.org/msg11681.html
this example may
