On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:11 AM, Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 18, 2008, at 6:52 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
apache needs a record of the checksummed artifact. this is likely to
be the zipped code.
FTR, Apache only needs this if there is no other way to map the
Step 5 of the IP clearance states:
If the source is referenced by checksum in the grant, commit the
canonical tarball for the donated code into the incubator drop area
together with a checksum and a detached signature. This will ensure
that apache has a legal record of the grant.
Complete and
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Step 5 of the IP clearance states:
If the source is referenced by checksum in the grant, commit the
canonical tarball for the donated code into the incubator drop area
together with a checksum and a detached
On 5/18/08, Robert Burrell Donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where do I commit the code and in what form? I have a kitten-auth.zip
file, should the zip file be committed or the unzipped code?
apache needs a record of the checksummed artifact. this is likely to
be the zipped code.
I've
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 7:08 PM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/18/08, Robert Burrell Donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where do I commit the code and in what form? I have a kitten-auth.zip
file, should the zip file be committed or the unzipped code?
apache needs a record of
On May 18, 2008, at 6:52 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
apache needs a record of the checksummed artifact. this is likely to
be the zipped code.
FTR, Apache only needs this if there is no other way to map the
contribution to the contributor. The easiest way to map them is
to have the
