Re: [1 IPMC VOTE NEEDED] [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating

2012-01-17 Thread Ate Douma
On 01/17/2012 10:41 AM, ant elder wrote: On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Ate Douma wrote: On 01/13/2012 09:53 AM, ant elder wrote: I've had a look, the only issue i see is I don't think the NOTICE file in the binary distribution is correct as it has many things which i expect are not requir

Re: [1 IPMC VOTE NEEDED] [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating

2012-01-17 Thread ant elder
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Ate Douma wrote: > On 01/13/2012 09:53 AM, ant elder wrote: >> >> I've had a look, the only issue i see is I don't think the NOTICE file >> in the binary distribution is correct as it has many things which i >> expect are not required. When we last discussed this

Re: [1 IPMC VOTE NEEDED] [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating

2012-01-14 Thread Ate Douma
On 01/13/2012 09:53 AM, ant elder wrote: I've had a look, the only issue i see is I don't think the NOTICE file in the binary distribution is correct as it has many things which i expect are not required. When we last discussed this on general@ we said this is not strictly a blocking problem, so

RE: [1 IPMC VOTE NEEDED] [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating

2012-01-13 Thread Franklin, Matthew B.
>I've had a look, the only issue i see is I don't think the NOTICE file >in the binary distribution is correct as it has many things which i >expect are not required. When we last discussed this on general@ we >said this is not strictly a blocking problem, so > >+1 > >but i think you should do a co

Re: [1 IPMC VOTE NEEDED] [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating

2012-01-13 Thread ant elder
I've had a look, the only issue i see is I don't think the NOTICE file in the binary distribution is correct as it has many things which i expect are not required. When we last discussed this on general@ we said this is not strictly a blocking problem, so +1 but i think you should do a complete r