On Jan 19, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Thanks. I'll get with Kevan to update the proposal before we finally
submit it for a vote.
Oops. Donald, we never synced up. My fault. Let's get this moving along.
IMO, we should structure the project as a normal incubator project, use
No problem. I've updated the Required Resources and Sponsoring Entity
sections and will start the vote on another thread. Thanks.
-Donald
On 2/23/10 10:00 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jan 19, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Thanks. I'll get with Kevan to update the proposal
Kevan,
Time to restart/finish this discussion.
I agree. Seems that things have cooled off a bit.
Personally, I'd have been happy to see this move forward either way
1) IP clearance with implementation work in Commons
This works only if we're dealing with a CODEBASE and an existing ASF
On Dec 30, 2009, at 4:55 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
This is not quite the scenario. We have a *dormant* component
(validator) in Commons and a couple of ASF committers (not commons
committers) have shown up proposing to re-write that component to
implement the new Bean Valiadation
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't
think weeding out those who consume more than they contribute as
an organizing principle would work. It is certainly not the way we
have been operating up to now at the ASF.
Yes it is. consuming in this
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Niall Pemberton
niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
This is not quite the scenario. We have a *dormant* component
(validator) in Commons and a couple of ASF committers (not commons
committers) have shown up proposing to re-write that component to
implement the
- Original Message
From: Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Thu, December 31, 2009 1:54:18 AM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation
Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: Phil Steitz
On Dec 31, 2009, at 3:40 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
As I said, we do not have a hard and fast rule on length of time,
but this nebulous notion is what makes the ASF work.
If that were true the incubator would need to be completely reworked,
because the process we use here is basically a
- Original Message
From: Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Thu, December 31, 2009 9:27:26 PM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation
On Dec 31, 2009, at 3:40 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
As I said, we
On Dec 31, 2009, at 7:20 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Getting back to the subject, my primary objection to what's being proposed is
that
commons should handle this as an ip clearance, not as a project incubation.
If
commons insists that the individuals in question have to submit patches to
Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: ant elder antel...@apache.org
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Fri, December 11, 2009 5:22:13 AM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Niall Pemberton
wrote
- Original Message
From: Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wed, December 30, 2009 1:30:13 PM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation
Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: ant elder
Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wed, December 30, 2009 1:30:13 PM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation
Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
- Original Message
From: Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wed, December 30, 2009 1:30:13 PM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation
- Original Message
From: Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wed, December 30, 2009 3:10:47 PM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation
Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: Phil Steitz
Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wed, December 30, 2009 3:10:47 PM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation
Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From
+1
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 3:14 AM, Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote:
Hello everyone,
I would like to present an incubator proposal for a new Validation podling,
which would be a JSR-303 Bean Validation follow-on to the existing Apache
Commons Validation 1.x project, but based on a new
It's related. Commons are sponsoring this incubation.
Hen
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
what about the effort from the Jakarta/Commons Validator community?
Aren't they doing that as well ? (or was it only stated to do so)?
-Matthias
On
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:56 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
A quick search so there has been some discussion on commons-dev - [1]
Does this really need to be incubated - the proposal says its intended
to graduate to Apache Commons and replace the existing Validator 1.x
component as
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Niall Pemberton
niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:56 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
A quick search so there has been some discussion on commons-dev - [1]
Does this really need to be incubated - the proposal says its intended
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
- Original Message
From: ant elder antel...@apache.org
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Fri, December 11, 2009 5:22:13 AM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation
- Original Message
From: Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Fri, December 11, 2009 6:29:26 AM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote
] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: ant elder
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Fri, December 11, 2009 5:22:13 AM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation
On Fri
From: Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Fri, December 11, 2009 12:08:50 PM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation
Good points, which we discussed some on the d...@commns list before asking
the
Commons PMC to sponsor
On 12/11/09 1:14 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
I would like to present an incubator proposal for a new Validation
podling, which would be a JSR-303 Bean Validation follow-on to the
existing Apache Commons Validation 1.x project, but based on a new
incoming codebase with a software grant from Agimatec
Hi Donald,
just to support you in the proposal and renew my interest on that project,
I've already been added in the possible contributors lists - I already
signed and sent the Apache ICLA.
Have a nice day, best regards,
Simone
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 2:14 AM, Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org
A quick search so there has been some discussion on commons-dev - [1]
Does this really need to be incubated - the proposal says its intended
to graduate to Apache Commons and replace the existing Validator 1.x
component as a new 2.0 codebase, from the discussion on commons-dev
everyone seems fine
27 matches
Mail list logo
