+1.
Cheers,
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Roman Shaposhnik
Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Date: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 at 10:36 PM
To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Subject: [VOTE] Recommend retirement for NPanday poddling
>This is a vote on recommending a retirem
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
> for the NPanday poddling.
>
> NPanday entered incubator on 13th of August 2010:
>http://incubator.apache.org/projects/npanday.html
> Up until 2012 the poddling was doi
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
> for the NPanday poddling...
-1 for now.
Unless I missed something I don't see any mention of this on the
NPanday mailing list at
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-npa
Wow - thanks for your diligence Bertrand. I support this -1 unless Bertrand
made a mistake.
Ross
-Original Message-
From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:bdelacre...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 2:02 AM
To: Incubator General
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Recommend retirement for
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:02 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
>> for the NPanday poddling...
>
> -1 for now.
>
> Unless I missed something I don't see any mention of this on the
> NPand
Mentors should raise the issue with the podling. If the mentors are absent then
maybe the problem doesn't lie with the podling but with our handling of it.
A VOTE should be a formality used on the few occasions where our bye-laws
require them. It certainly should not, IMHO, be a stick to wave in
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
wrote:
> Mentors should raise the issue with the podling. If the mentors are absent
> then maybe the problem
> doesn't lie with the podling but with our handling of it.
The only active mentors left on the project seem to be of an
opini
Actually, as per this email http://is.gd/55HOkJ I have emailed npanday-dev@
with the reminder about missing report.
And I have raised the flag about project's issues on the general@ before. As
far as I can tell this whole discussion about NPanday is going on for about a
year now (by very modest e
nal Message-
From: shaposh...@gmail.com [mailto:shaposh...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Roman
Shaposhnik
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 2:01 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Recommend retirement for NPanday poddling
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
: Konstantin Boudnik [mailto:c...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 2:06 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Recommend retirement for NPanday poddling
Actually, as per this email http://is.gd/55HOkJ I have emailed npanday-dev@
with the reminder about missing report.
c.
> A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Konstantin Boudnik [mailto:c...@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 2:06 PM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Recommend retirement for NPanday poddling
>
> Actual
the noise.
> >
> > Ross
> >
> > Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
> > A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
> >
> > -----Original Message-
> > From: Konstantin Boudnik [mailto:c...@apache.org]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 2:06 PM
> > To:
community. Remember not everyone reads general@ and those that do
> often
> > get
> > > drowned in the noise.
> > >
> > > Ross
> > >
> > > Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
> > > A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
> > >
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: shaposh...@gmail.com [mailto:shaposh...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Roman
> Shaposhnik
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 2:01 PM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Recommend retirement for NPanday poddling
>
> On Thu, Dec
t; > get
> > > drowned in the noise.
> > >
> > > Ross
> > >
> > > Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
> > > A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Konstantin Boud
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 1:28 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> ...Let's cancel this vote and have at least Cos send them a note saying "many
> of us in the IPMC think you should retire" (but more nicely/PC). Give them
> 72 hours to provide feedback
+1, after that I'm ok to vote on retirement.
-Ber
+1
- Henry
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
> for the NPanday poddling.
>
> It comes on the hills of the general consensus of
> the NPanday community and its mentors that
> retirement is the only viable path at this poi
+1 Even though I do not like to see a podling end like this, but life
support has to be terminated at a point.
rgds
jan i
On Wednesday, January 21, 2015, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
> for the NPanday poddling.
>
> It comes on the hills of the gen
+1 to retire. The half full aspect is that it looks like people are
doing something more useful with their time.
Hadrian
On 01/21/2015 05:19 PM, jan i wrote:
+1 Even though I do not like to see a podling end like this, but life
support has to be terminated at a point.
rgds
jan i
On Wednesda
+1
Retirement isn't a failure. It is just one of several options. Not every
projects needs to continue on original form, and not every project needs to
be at Apache.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
> for the NPanda
+1
It's a cool idea, but the technology direction has gone a different way.
On Wed Jan 21 2015 at 5:15:33 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
> for the NPanday poddling.
>
> It comes on the hills of the general consensus of
> the NPanday community and
+1
Regards,
Alan
> On Jan 21, 2015, at 2:13 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
> [ ] +1 Recommend retiring NPanday poddling from the Incubator.
> [ ] +/-0 Don't care, but...
> [ ] -1 Don't recommend retiring NPanday poddling from the Incubator because
> ...
On Wednesday, January 21, 2015, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
> for the NPanday poddling.
+1 but it looks like a few people are interested in using and working on
that code, please make sure clear instructions are given to them about how
they can fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21/01/15 22:19, jan i wrote:
> +1 Even though I do not like to see a podling end like this, but life
> support has to be terminated at a point.
Isn't this the podling that requested retirement months ago, and was
told to give it one more try?
jona
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 9:03 AM, jonathon wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 21/01/15 22:19, jan i wrote:
>> +1 Even though I do not like to see a podling end like this, but life
>> support has to be terminated at a point.
>
> Isn't this the podling that requested reti
+1
LieGrue,
strub
> On Wednesday, 21 January 2015, 23:15, Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
> >T his is a vote on recommending a retirement option
> for the NPanday poddling.
>
> It comes on the hills of the general consensus of
> the NPanday community and its mentors that
> retirement is the only
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> ...We had a vote thread about a month ago: http://s.apache.org/HIF ...
And I voted -1 at that time (http://s.apache.org/Vqa) but my concern
has been addressed, hence my +1 above.
-Bertrand
---
+1 (binding)
On Jan 21, 2015, at 2:13 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
> for the NPanday poddling.
>
> It comes on the hills of the general consensus of
> the NPanday community and its mentors that
> retirement is the only viable path at this point
+1 [sadly]
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 02:13PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
> for the NPanday poddling.
>
> It comes on the hills of the general consensus of
> the NPanday community and its mentors that
> retirement is the only viable path at this poin
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
> for the NPanday poddling.
>
> It comes on the hills of the general consensus of
> the NPanday community and its mentors that
> retirement is the only viable path at this point:
> htt
+1 (non-binding)
-Taylor
> On Jan 30, 2015, at 12:50 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
>> for the NPanday poddling.
>>
>> It comes on the hills of the general consensus of
>> the NPa
So, at this point, is this resolved? I may have missed the final
resolution summary.
John
On Wed Jan 21 2015 at 5:15:33 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
> for the NPanday poddling.
>
> It comes on the hills of the general consensus of
> the NPanda
On Sun Feb 08 2015 at 7:48:11 AM John D. Ament
wrote:
> So, at this point, is this resolved? I may have missed the final
> resolution summary.
>
>
Nevermind, got thrown off in my search by a late vote. I just retired them
from podlings.xml and will remove them from the board report shortly,
unl
We need to report that NPanday is being retired.
On Feb 8, 2015, at 4:50 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Sun Feb 08 2015 at 7:48:11 AM John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
>> So, at this point, is this resolved? I may have missed the final
>> resolution summary.
>>
>>
> Nevermind, got thrown off in my sea
On Sun Feb 08 2015 at 7:57:28 AM Dave Fisher wrote:
> We need to report that NPanday is being retired.
>
>
Yep, added a retired section.
John
> On Feb 8, 2015, at 4:50 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> > On Sun Feb 08 2015 at 7:48:11 AM John D. Ament
> > wrote:
> >
> >> So, at this point, is this
FWIW: Cos and I were planning to finalize the retirement steps today.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 5:01 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Sun Feb 08 2015 at 7:57:28 AM Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>> We need to report that NPanday is being retired.
>>
>>
> Yep, added a retired section.
>
> John
>
Hope I didn't throw you off, just wanted to make sure I was doing some
basic shepherding work (since I pulled the NPanday card this month :-)
John
On Sun Feb 08 2015 at 8:06:51 PM Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> FWIW: Cos and I were planning to finalize the retirement steps today.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 5:16 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Hope I didn't throw you off, just wanted to make sure I was doing some
> basic shepherding work (since I pulled the NPanday card this month :-)
Nah, its cool. I've initiated all the required steps and updated the website.
At this point, we're
On Sun Feb 08 2015 at 8:59:21 PM Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 5:16 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
> > Hope I didn't throw you off, just wanted to make sure I was doing some
> > basic shepherding work (since I pulled the NPanday card this month :-)
>
> Nah, its cool. I've initiate
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 6:06 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Sun Feb 08 2015 at 8:59:21 PM Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 5:16 PM, John D. Ament
>> wrote:
>> > Hope I didn't throw you off, just wanted to make sure I was doing some
>> > basic shepherding work (since I pulled t
40 matches
Mail list logo
