We are preparing for realese work right now.
some mentors in ASF support our project and are willing to give us one more
month to do this work.
I think
2011/7/19 Bertrand Delacretaz
> (dropping bluesky-dev)
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Bernd Fondermann
> wrote:
> > ...The vote to retire
Has Bluesky project been retired by ASF?
Can we continue to release work?
2011/7/19 Chen Liu
> We are preparing for realese work right now.
> some mentors in ASF support our project and are willing to give us one
> more month to do this work.
> I think
>
>
> 2011/7/19 Bertrand Delacretaz
>
>>
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:10, Chen Liu wrote:
> Has Bluesky project been retired by ASF?
I'm sorry, but: yes.
> Can we continue to release work?
I'm not sure what you mean by release, but SVN will soon be closed for Bluesky.
Bernd
>
> 2011/7/19 Chen Liu
>
>> We are preparing for realese w
Am 19.07.2011 11:10, schrieb Chen Liu:
> Can we continue to release work?
Sure, but *not* within the Apache Incubator.
Cheers,
Andreas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands,
If no one else wants to, and if there is no stay of execution, then
I'll run the following tomorrow night:
svn remove http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bluesky/
Hen
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> (dropping bluesky-dev)
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:30 PM
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Bernd Fondermann
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:10, Chen Liu wrote:
>> Has Bluesky project been retired by ASF?
>
> I'm sorry, but: yes.
See here for the vote results:
http://s.apache.org/7oo
And this markmail query provides more context:
http://s.apache.o
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> If no one else wants to, and if there is no stay of execution, then
> I'll run the following tomorrow night:
>
> svn remove http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bluesky/
Cool - I have created INFRA-3785 asking for deletion of the maili
Er, have you explicitly told the Bluesky lists that the repo is about to
be deleted? In very clear and plain terms, so there's no chance for
miscommunication?
Before we nuke something, we should double-check that any relevant
parties have had a chance to make their own backup of it.
Alterna
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> ...Er, have you explicitly told the Bluesky lists that the repo is about to be
> deleted? In very clear and plain terms, so there's no chance for
> miscommunication?
>
> Before we nuke something, we should double-check that any relevant part
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:48 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> Er, have you explicitly told the Bluesky lists that the repo is about to be
> deleted? In very clear and plain terms, so there's no chance for
> miscommunication?
I think I just did :) Chen Liu's on the list.
> Before we nuke something, we
> Er, have you explicitly told the Bluesky lists that the repo is about to
> be deleted?
> Alternatively, we can simply turn off write access [to] ensure it's not
> actively developed, but that it's available.
Are we deleting or moving to an attic-type section?
--- Noel
--
We need time to backup Bluesky.
Please dont delete us without any warnings.
Thanks!
2011/7/21 Noel J. Bergman
> > Er, have you explicitly told the Bluesky lists that the repo is about to
> > be deleted?
>
> > Alternatively, we can simply turn off write access [to] ensure it's not
> > actively de
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>> Er, have you explicitly told the Bluesky lists that the repo is about to
>> be deleted?
>
>> Alternatively, we can simply turn off write access [to] ensure it's not
>> actively developed, but that it's available.
>
> Are we deleting or mo
Svn dump & private download for concerned party?
On Jul 21, 2011, at 12:23 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>>> Er, have you explicitly told the Bluesky lists that the repo is about to
>>> be deleted?
>>
>>> Alternatively, we can simply turn of
14 matches
Mail list logo
