Thanks Rob,
Looking I've the Kenai site I notice that there is as good as no visible
activity within the project. You mention that the "ODF Toolkit Union Steering
Committee" met and approved the idea of this proposal, but this is not visible
so we don't know what this means.
What interest is
I support this idea.
I think with regard to need for an SGA or not, there is the matter of the
current headings at the tops of source files. (I have no idea what is
required, I'm simply
observing what is there.)
- Dennis
"/***
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> Thanks Rob,
>
> Looking I've the Kenai site I notice that there is as good as no visible
> activity within the project. You mention that the "ODF Toolkit Union Steering
> Committee" met and approved the idea of this proposal, but this is not
> There is activity. It just is not evenly distributed.
[...]
I presume the activity is more in the Java libraries. :-)
As for activity in the AODL, the .NET library:
The home page's link to source is broken.
http://odftoolkit.org/projects/aodl/pages/Home
points to:
http://odftoolkit.org/sourc
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Lee Fisher wrote:
>> There is activity. It just is not evenly distributed.
> [...]
>
> I presume the activity is more in the Java libraries. :-)
>
I not asking you to presume anything. I'm just following up on
interest expressed on this list a few weeks ago. I
FYI Apache OpenOffice.org podling has been active for two weeks. Information
is here.
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openofficeorg.html
http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/
What do the people here on the POI project think of gettin
Hi Dennis,
If I understand correctly, the practice at Apache would be to remove
these legacy copyright statements and aggregate them into a single
NOTICE document. This would be true, even if it says "DO NOT ALTER OR
REMOVE". I imagine they would even tear off those tags on mattresses.
-Rob
On
Hi Rob and all,
Please help a non-English speaker, it's me :) , in the midst of
jargon; ODF, Apache, OASIS, ISO/IEC JTC1, OpenOffice, LibreOffice,
Symphony, KOffice/Calligra, Microsoft Office, Corel Wordperfect,
Google Docs, ODFDOM, DOM API, Conformance Tools, XSLTRunner, AODL,
C#/.NET, Java, PDFB
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> Hi Dennis,
>
> If I understand correctly, the practice at Apache would be to remove
> these legacy copyright statements and aggregate them into a single
> NOTICE document. This would be true, even if it says "DO NOT ALTER OR
> REMOVE". I imagine
Keep in mind this thread is in three places or two places or one place all
depending on how people have replied. It will be confusing. Please include
POI-DEV so we can discuss it here without going everywhere else as well.
On Jun 27, 2011, at 3:44 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> FYI Apache OpenOffic
Rob Weir wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 19:00:50 -0400:
> Hi Dennis,
>
> If I understand correctly, the practice at Apache would be to remove
> these legacy copyright statements and aggregate them into a single
> NOTICE document. This would be true, even if it says "DO NOT ALTER OR
> REMOVE". I i
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Rob Weir wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 19:00:50 -0400:
>> Hi Dennis,
>>
>> If I understand correctly, the practice at Apache would be to remove
>> these legacy copyright statements and aggregate them into a single
>> NOTICE document. This wo
On Jun 27, 2011, at 5:51 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Daniel Shahaf
wrote:
Rob Weir wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 19:00:50 -0400:
Hi Dennis,
If I understand correctly, the practice at Apache would be to remove
these legacy copyright statements and aggregate them int
I'm top posting because you've answered most of the immediate issues I
had. I apologise for not having looked deeper and found the activity
you are referring to. I was clearly only looking at top level mailing
lists. Thanks for taking the time to point me in the right direction,
that kenai site is
Rob Weir wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 20:51:53 -0400:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> > Rob Weir wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 19:00:50 -0400:
> >> Hi Dennis,
> >>
> >> If I understand correctly, the practice at Apache would be to remove
> >> these legacy copyright st
Hi Rob,
I'm a committer and PMC in the POI project and I'm interested in
integration with the ODF Toolkit.
Apache will be a good home for this codebase and many ASF projects
will benefit from it.
For POI I see the following potential benefits:
- have a common Java API to manipulate with Spreadsh
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 6:31 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Rob Weir wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 20:51:53 -0400:
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Daniel Shahaf
>> wrote:
>> > Rob Weir wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 19:00:50 -0400:
>> >> Hi Dennis,
>> >>
>> >> If I understand correctly, the pract
Rob Weir wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 07:52:58 -0400:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 6:31 AM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> > Rob Weir wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 20:51:53 -0400:
> >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> >> wrote:
> >> > Rob Weir wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 19:00:50 -040
We continue to discuss moving this work to Apache. Feedback so far
has been to try for an eventual TLP. We're starting to draft the
Incubation proposal. We talked to the maintainer of the C#/AODL
component and he confirmed that it is not really active anymore. He
might move it to bitbucket. So
On Fri, 1 Jul 2011, Rob Weir wrote:
We continue to discuss moving this work to Apache. Feedback so far has
been to try for an eventual TLP. We're starting to draft the Incubation
proposal. We talked to the maintainer of the C#/AODL component and he
confirmed that it is not really active anym
20 matches
Mail list logo
