> Do we really want to do this? svnpubsub remains unsupported, AFAICT, and
> it's uptime/reliability has been dismal.
I don't see any reason to make the change until infra tells us to do it, or at
least likes the idea.
--- Noel
On 6/17/2010 2:30 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 6/17/2010 9:06 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Justin Erenkrantz
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:26 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
It is possible to run an incubator.staging.apache.org, syncing off a
br
On 6/17/2010 9:06 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Justin Erenkrantz
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:26 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
>>> It is possible to run an incubator.staging.apache.org, syncing off a
>>> branch, and the live site off trunk, or vice versa.
>>>
>>
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:26 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
>> It is possible to run an incubator.staging.apache.org, syncing off a
>> branch, and the live site off trunk, or vice versa.
>>
>> (possible, but I wouldn't recommend it, merging html
2010/2/5 Justin Erenkrantz :
>
> (Perhaps we should move this conversation to infra-dev?) -- justin
>
Or maybe site-dev, not really sure
Regards
Santiago
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For a
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:26 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
> It is possible to run an incubator.staging.apache.org, syncing off a
> branch, and the live site off trunk, or vice versa.
>
> (possible, but I wouldn't recommend it, merging html changes like that
> is pretty meh)
I think we pretty much have
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> This would mean that any commits made to the site-publish tree would
> automatically be deployed to the site. No more delays, no more SSH
> and SVN up fun. Yay.
+1, one doesn't have to be very tired or distracted long enough to forget i
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:26 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> On 2/4/2010 11:24 PM, Martin Cooper wrote:
>> In that case, +0 from me. We gain the elimination of the p.a.o bit but
>> lose the benefit of the delay, so it's basically a wash, as far as I'm
>> concerned.
>
> After several years of watc
On 2/4/2010 11:24 PM, Martin Cooper wrote:
> In that case, +0 from me. We gain the elimination of the p.a.o bit but
> lose the benefit of the delay, so it's basically a wash, as far as I'm
> concerned.
After several years of watching incubator site commits, I don't see this
is a serious problem.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Martin Cooper wrote:
>> Unless I'm missing something, using svnpubsub will only remove the
>> need for the second part (checkout on p.a.o), but not the first part
>> (Anakia). People will still need to run
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 5:02 PM, David Crossley wrote:
> Does 'svnpubsub' also dispense with the hourly rsync step
> to truly be live.
> i.e. http://apache.org/dev/project-site.html
> find-in-page: rsync
Yes.
> Is there a description of svnpubsub?
Other than:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/
Martin Cooper wrote:
>
> Unless I'm missing something, using svnpubsub will only remove the
> need for the second part (checkout on p.a.o), but not the first part
> (Anakia). People will still need to run Anakia to generate the HTML
> pages from the XML sources, but when they check in the HTML, it
+1
On 2/3/2010 1:57 AM, Gav... wrote:
>
> This system is not applied to most TLPs, though they can request it.
> And I'm betting that every single project that graduates will make that
> request rather than learn the old cumbersome way.
++1 :)
---
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Martin Cooper wrote:
> Unless I'm missing something, using svnpubsub will only remove the
> need for the second part (checkout on p.a.o), but not the first part
> (Anakia). People will still need to run Anakia to generate the HTML
> pages from the XML sources, but w
On 02/02/2010 11:57 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Hi general@,
I'd like to suggest switching incubator.apache.org over to svnpubsub.
(We can do so by filing a JIRA like INFRA-2349:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2349)
+1 from me too. As a current incubator contributor, this woul
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Hi general@,
I'd like to suggest switching incubator.apache.org over to svnpubsub.
terrific idea!
+1
-jean
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional comman
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 6:51 AM, Upayavira wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 22:57 -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>> Hi general@,
>>
>> I'd like to suggest switching incubator.apache.org over to svnpubsub.
>> (We can do so by filing a JIRA like INFRA-2349:
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFR
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 22:57 -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> Hi general@,
>
> I'd like to suggest switching incubator.apache.org over to svnpubsub.
> (We can do so by filing a JIRA like INFRA-2349:
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2349)
>
> This would mean that any commits made to t
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 1:57 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> Hi general@,
>
> I'd like to suggest switching incubator.apache.org over to svnpubsub.
> (We can do so by filing a JIRA like INFRA-2349:
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2349)
+1.
Yoav
---
> -Original Message-
> From: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:martijn.dasho...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 3 February 2010 5:28 PM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Switching incubator.apache.org to svnpubsub?
>
> +0.9
>
> I agree that the site u
+0.9
I agree that the site update process is cumbersome, but it also gives
podling folks an incentive to log on to p.a.o and learn to use that
system to their advantage. Moving to svnpubsub would take that away.
That said, I think that most committers never have to go to p.a.o in
any case so perh
+1 from me too!
Cheers,
Tommaso
2010/2/3 Jukka Zitting
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Justin Erenkrantz
> wrote:
> > I'd like to suggest switching incubator.apache.org over to svnpubsub.
>
> +1!
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>
> ---
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> I'd like to suggest switching incubator.apache.org over to svnpubsub.
+1!
BR,
Jukka Zitting
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> +1 from me on this - I'd see the OODT changes more quickly, right?
Indeed! Your note re: OODT is what triggered me to send this email.
=P -- justin
-
To unsubs
+1 from me on this - I'd see the OODT changes more quickly, right?
Cheers,
Chris
On 2/2/10 10:57 PM, "Justin Erenkrantz" wrote:
Hi general@,
I'd like to suggest switching incubator.apache.org over to svnpubsub.
(We can do so by filing a JIRA like INFRA-2349:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/brow
25 matches
Mail list logo
