On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> Matt, you're saying the same thing, except it's not one individual but two
> [1] (spmallette + okram) , who own the vast majority of the IP. They also
> claim to be in the possession of CLAs from the other contributors.
>
> The problem was n
Matt, you're saying the same thing, except it's not one individual but
two [1] (spmallette + okram) , who own the vast majority of the IP. They
also claim to be in the possession of CLAs from the other contributors.
The problem was not insufficient data to substantiate claims, but TMI.
Secreta
On Mon Feb 02 2015 at 8:09:43 AM Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>
> On 02/01/2015 03:19 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 2:12 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
> >> On Sun Feb 01 2015 at 1:05:10 AM Alex Harui wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> On 1/31/15, 9:09 AM, "Benson Margulies" wrote:
> >>>
>
On 02/01/2015 03:19 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 2:12 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
On Sun Feb 01 2015 at 1:05:10 AM Alex Harui wrote:
On 1/31/15, 9:09 AM, "Benson Margulies" wrote:
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matt Franklin
wrote:
On Sat Jan 31 2015 at 11:22:15
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 2:12 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Sun Feb 01 2015 at 1:05:10 AM Alex Harui wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 1/31/15, 9:09 AM, "Benson Margulies" wrote:
>>
>> >On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matt Franklin
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Sat Jan 31 2015 at 11:22:15 AM Benson Margulies
>> >>
>>
On Sun Feb 01 2015 at 1:05:10 AM Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 1/31/15, 9:09 AM, "Benson Margulies" wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matt Franklin
> > wrote:
> >> On Sat Jan 31 2015 at 11:22:15 AM Benson Margulies
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 10:55 AM, James Carm
On 1/31/15, 9:09 AM, "Benson Margulies" wrote:
>On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matt Franklin
> wrote:
>> On Sat Jan 31 2015 at 11:22:15 AM Benson Margulies
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 10:55 AM, James Carman
>>> wrote:
>>> > Are there guidelines for these "usual consideration
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matt Franklin
wrote:
> On Sat Jan 31 2015 at 11:22:15 AM Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 10:55 AM, James Carman
>> wrote:
>> > Are there guidelines for these "usual considerations"?
>>
>> (Queue Marvin on the subject of documentation.)
>>
On Sat Jan 31 2015 at 11:22:15 AM Benson Margulies
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 10:55 AM, James Carman
> wrote:
> > Are there guidelines for these "usual considerations"?
>
> (Queue Marvin on the subject of documentation.)
>
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/
>
> My understanding: when a sign
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 10:55 AM, James Carman
wrote:
> Are there guidelines for these "usual considerations"?
(Queue Marvin on the subject of documentation.)
http://www.apache.org/licenses/
My understanding: when a significant body of code arrives all at once,
the Foundation desires an SGA. Th
Are there guidelines for these "usual considerations"?
On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 8:44 AM, James Carman
> > wrote:
> > Is there a "standard" within the incubator about how we go about
> > getting the appropriate forms filled out when we want
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 8:44 AM, James Carman
wrote:
> Is there a "standard" within the incubator about how we go about
> getting the appropriate forms filled out when we want to incubate a
> project from GitHub? GitHub fosters a sort of fly-by contribution
> model (and that's a good thing), but
Is there a "standard" within the incubator about how we go about
getting the appropriate forms filled out when we want to incubate a
project from GitHub? GitHub fosters a sort of fly-by contribution
model (and that's a good thing), but it makes donating the code a bit
troublesome, because we need
13 matches
Mail list logo
