Would probably also be a good idea to fix the tuscany page itself..It mentions that it is in the
incubator, but the page title and header is Apache Tuscany..
Mvgr,
Martin
Mike Edwards wrote:
Dion,
You're right. It should mention Incubator.
I apologise for this oversight and I'll get it
The branding page says that a podling must be referred to as Apache
Podling-Name and I think this is consistent with that. A quick poll
of podling websites shows this to be the norm.
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html
Right. We tried to do the best
On Jul 14, 2006, at 2:30 PM, Martin van den Bemt wrote:
Would probably also be a good idea to fix the tuscany page
itself..It mentions that it is in the incubator, but the page title
and header is Apache Tuscany..
The branding page says that a podling must be referred to as Apache
Yes, any project that is part of the Incubator needs to refer to the Apache
Incubator in the first mention of the project in a contiguous body of work.
(e.g. one document, one web page, one article). Hopefully, our newly
devised policies and procedures will make this clearer to all
Are documents like
https://www14.software.ibm.com/iwm/web/cc/earlyprograms/websphere/soawas61/
supposed to mention that a project is in the incubator?
--
http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
If you even dream of beating me you'd better wake up and apologize -
Muhammad Ali
