Re: Voting new PPMC members - initial vote thread required?

+1 to Marvin's suggestion. If we make incubation as much like operating as a TLP then graduating podlings will be better prepared. -Taylor > On Jun 5, 2016, at 9:53 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 6:37 PM, P. Taylor Goetz

Re: Voting new PPMC members - initial vote thread required?

On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 6:37 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > IMO as long as that second email is private, then we could probably drop the > requirement for the first notification. +1 to drop one or the other. I would argue to drop the second instead and only send the email

Re: Voting new PPMC members - initial vote thread required?

IMO as long as that second email is private, then we could probably drop the requirement for the first notification. -Taylor > On Jun 5, 2016, at 9:29 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 8:56 PM P. Taylor Goetz

Re: Voting new PPMC members - initial vote thread required?

On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 8:56 PM P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > I don't know the full history behind that requirement, but it would seem > to me the essence is to make sure any IPMC members have a chance to object > in private before anything hits a public list (I.e. general@). >

Re: Voting new PPMC members - initial vote thread required?

I don't know the full history behind that requirement, but it would seem to me the essence is to make sure any IPMC members have a chance to object in private before anything hits a public list (I.e. general@). -Taylor > On Jun 5, 2016, at 7:02 PM, John D. Ament wrote:

Voting new PPMC members - initial vote thread required?

All, I thought we discussed this in the past, maybe I missed some part of the discussion. I thought that this section was to be removed from the wording: The [VOTE] message should be forwarded to the IPMC ( priv...@incubator.apache.org) to notify them that the vote is underway. Do not CC or BCC