On Jul 22, 2009, at 3:31 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Are we cool with the name 'wookie' as a mark??
How is incubator PMC to evaluate this question?
Apparently the submitters are cool with it, or it would not be on
their
proposal :)
Just closing the loop on
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Jim Jagielskij...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Jul 22, 2009, at 3:31 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Are we cool with the name 'wookie' as a mark??
How is incubator PMC to evaluate this question?
Apparently the submitters are cool with it,
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jul 22, 2009, at 3:31 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Are we cool with the name 'wookie' as a mark??
How is incubator PMC to evaluate this question?
Apparently the submitters are cool with it, or it would not be on their
proposal :)
Just
2009/7/23 Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com:
On Jul 22, 2009, at 3:31 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Are we cool with the name 'wookie' as a mark??
...
Just closing the loop on the various trademark debates being done
on prc@ and members@, of course.
It's called
Ross Gardler wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Are we cool with the name 'wookie' as a mark??
...
Just closing the loop on the various trademark debates being done
on prc@ and members@, of course.
It's called oversight.
Thanks
Are we cool with the name 'wookie' as a mark??
On Jul 20, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
In the wookie proposal I recommended that the consortium agreement for
the donating project be examined to ensure that none of the other
institutions can lay claim to any IP in the code.
I now have
Hi,
2009/7/22 Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com:
Are we cool with the name 'wookie' as a mark??
Ahem, ITYM Apache Wookie ;-)
Flipancy aside, I'm fine with it ... the Lucasfilm mark is wookiee,
and there doesn't appear to be anything other than a friendly Debian
hacker named wookie. I doubt he'd
2009/7/22 Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com:
Are we cool with the name 'wookie' as a mark??
I have done trademark searches in the UK and the US.
In the US there are three dead trademarks:
WOOKIES for Flavored nuts, shelled nuts, roasted nuts; processed
nuts; snack mix consisting primarily of
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Are we cool with the name 'wookie' as a mark??
How is incubator PMC to evaluate this question?
Apparently the submitters are cool with it, or it would not be on their
proposal :)
The one thing that might be concerning is that most people will use a
query such as;
2009/7/22 William A. Rowe, Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Are we cool with the name 'wookie' as a mark??
...
The one thing that might be concerning is that most people will use a
query such as;
http://www.google.com/search?q=wookie+download
and be lost in the approx 135k
On 22 Jul 2009, at 20:31, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
The one thing that might be concerning is that most people will use a
query such as;
http://www.google.com/search?q=wookie+download
and be lost in the approx 135k results :)
Not quite as bad on that score as the River or Click or Ace
I was going to propose that whatever the next project approved for the
incubator is that it should be required to be named Foo.
Ralph
On Jul 22, 2009, at 8:42 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Are we cool with the name 'wookie' as a mark??
On Jul 20, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
In the
Hi,
2009/7/20 Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org:
In my opinion this is sufficient for the ASF to accept this
contribution (once (i)CLAs are in place). Speak up if you think
differently.
Looks good. You might want to cc the wookie-dev list, so this
important information becomes part of the
2009/7/21 Andrew Savory s...@andrewsavory.com:
Hi,
2009/7/20 Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org:
In my opinion this is sufficient for the ASF to accept this
contribution (once (i)CLAs are in place). Speak up if you think
differently.
Looks good. You might want to cc the wookie-dev list, so
In the wookie proposal I recommended that the consortium agreement for
the donating project be examined to ensure that none of the other
institutions can lay claim to any IP in the code.
I now have a copy of the consortium agreement and can confirm that it says:
The Parties agree to disseminate
15 matches
Mail list logo
