Hi,
On 2/8/07, Curt Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a mad rush to make it look like we were busy in the three months
LOL ;)
log4net appears to be healthy and ready to join Logging Services as a
subproject.
Excellent. The log4net developers should start up a vote saying
they're ready
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
On 2/8/07, Curt Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I've already started a thread on eliminating or simplifying the
Logging Services bylaws (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-
logging-generalm=117095930231054w=2). I thought I saw an thread
here that suggested
On Feb 9, 2007, at 7:49 AM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
On 2/8/07, Curt Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a mad rush to make it look like we were busy in the three months
LOL ;)
log4net appears to be healthy and ready to join Logging Services as a
subproject.
Excellent. The log4net
In a mad rush to make it look like we were busy in the three months
since the last board report, I'd like to try to resolve log4net and
log4php's status as well and try to streamline the Logging Services
bylaws (aka guidelines). Most of that discussion and all of the fun
debates will be
