On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
...either this pTLP idea is independent of the IPMC. Or it is not
I think it is actually in between ;-)
While the pTLP itself, once created by the board, is independent of
the Incubator PMC, the
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:24 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
...the steps that lead to the board voting on the pTLP
creation resolution are IMO best handled by the Incubator PMC, as they
are fairly
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:44 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
...The Incubator PMC might not have a
formal say in pTLP creation, but there's significant work that happens
before that, collaboratively and in public.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:24 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
...either this pTLP idea is independent of the IPMC. Or it is not
I think it is actually in between ;-)
While
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:44 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:24 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
...the steps that lead to the board voting on the pTLP
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 4:11 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:44 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org
...The Incubator PMC might not have a
formal say in pTLP
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:11 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:44 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
...The Incubator PMC might not have a
formal say in pTLP creation, but
Marvin,
I think the IPMC doesn't need to do anything, and instead the dissolution
of Incubator's duties are put into the Board Resolution, just as they are
with the normal graduation resolution.
So, from the Incubator's point of view, there is no effort, podling
disappears and the pTLP is
: 3/1/2015 6:38 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.orgmailto:general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: pTLP process amendments
Marvin,
I think the IPMC doesn't need to do anything, and instead the dissolution
of Incubator's duties are put into the Board Resolution, just as they are
with the normal
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:08 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 7:08 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:35 AM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:27 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
The
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 7:08 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:35 AM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:27 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
The proposal only refer to new projects entering Apache, would it be
worth
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:27 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
The proposal only refer to new projects entering Apache, would it be worth
while to consider a way for projects that entered Incubator recently and
has enough (whatever that is) asf members as committers ?
That is a discussion for
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:35 AM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:27 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
The proposal only refer to new projects entering Apache, would it be worth
while to consider a way for projects that entered Incubator recently and
has
On Wednesday, February 25, 2015, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
3.7 -- That is not default for TLPs, as only PMC members subscribe to
private@
3.8 -- Follow TLP recommendations and guidelines.
3.9 -- Follow TLP recommendations and guidelines.
i.e. what is now written in 3.11
3.7 -- That is not default for TLPs, as only PMC members subscribe to
private@
3.8 -- Follow TLP recommendations and guidelines.
3.9 -- Follow TLP recommendations and guidelines.
i.e. what is now written in 3.11 will cover these three points and can be
removed.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:18
Hi Niclas!
First of all: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9195
Hopefully INFRA will respond soon so we can all collaborate
on the content. At this point I've started the documentation to
the level of details currently on Incubator pages.
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Niclas Hedhman
This is fantastic. Thanks you, Niclas!
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
Roman,
See comments below to
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COMDEV/Provisional+TLP
2.1 -- I suggest to change the word probationary to provisional. I
also
Roman,
See comments below to
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COMDEV/Provisional+TLP
2.1 -- I suggest to change the word probationary to provisional. I
also suggest that a text is added such as; 'It is required that the
provisional concept is explained in detail to the users, for
18 matches
Mail list logo
