Big +1
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Vincent Siveton vsive...@apache.org wrote:
Hi folks
FYI, the Shindig community has successfully voted for graduation [1].
If no objection on the charter or other, I will start a formal
acceptance vote soon.
Cheers,
Vincent
[1]
+1 (slightly late, but I have a great excuse!)
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 (binding)
Good luck.
--kevan
On Jan 28, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
Greetings,
We took the feedback from the earlier discussion[1] here and added our
+1
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote:
+1 (binding )
sent from my Android phone
Am 06.05.2010 07:57 schrieb Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com:
+1
--Gurkan
From: Simone Gianni simo...@apache.org
To:
=
* Ali Ghodsi (UC Berkeley / Swedish Institute of Computer Science)
* Benjamin Hindman (UC Berkeley)
* Andy Konwinski (UC Berkeley)
* Matei Zaharia (UC Berkeley)
= Sponsors =
== Champion ==
Tom White
== Nominated Mentors ==
* Dhruba Borthakur
* Brian McCallister
* Tom White
The proposal looks fine, but the name collides with http://howl.ow2.org/
-Brian
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Alan Gates ga...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
I would like to propose Howl as an Apache Incubator project. Howl is a
table and storage management service for data created using Apache
* Matt Stephenson, Google
* Everett Toews, Rackspace
== Sponsors ==
=== Champion ===
* Brian McCallister, Apache Software Foundation
=== Mentors ===
* Brian McCallister, Apache Software Foundation
* Tom White, Apache Software Foundation
* Henning Schmiedehausen, Apache Software
Aurora is aimed at long-running stateless services (like app servers)?
-Brian
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Dave Lester d...@ischool.berkeley.eduwrote:
Hi All,
We're pleased to share a draft ASF incubation proposal for Aurora, a
service scheduler used to schedule jobs onto Apache Mesos
And a belated +1, not that it needs the extra vote, but jclouds functions
great!
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 3:56 AM, Suresh Marru sma...@apache.org wrote:
On Sep 23, 2013, at 2:57 PM, Andrew Bayer andrew.ba...@gmail.com wrote:
Reminder - it'd be great to get more eyes and make sure we're not
I don't remember seeing anything about a CloudStack project, is there
something I missed?
http://www.citrix.com/English/NE/news/news.asp?newsID=2323072
-Brian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
+1 swept for licensing and general organization of everything :-)
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Matei Zaharia ma...@eecs.berkeley.edu wrote:
+1
Tested it on Mac OS X, seems to work fine.
Matei
On Apr 19, 2012, at 12:53 PM, Benjamin Hindman wrote:
Please vote on releasing the following
+1
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Benjamin Hindman b...@berkeley.eduwrote:
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Mesos
(incubating) version 0.10.0. This will be the second incubator release for
Mesos in Apache.
The candidate for Mesos 0.10.0-incubating release is
BrianMcCallister
Thanks!
-Brian
On Mar 14, 2006, at 9:51 AM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
And continuning the discussion from the OpenJPA proposal thread, do
the other 27 - 15 = 12 people on the proposal get moved into
non-committer status?
Speaking as one of those twelve, I'd greatly appreciate not being
removed just because I am
+1
-Brian
On Mar 19, 2006, at 5:33 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
What follows is the official proposal for OpenJPA. The unofficial
version can be found here
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenJPAProposal
Please vote on acceptance of this proposal. The vote will run 1
week until
On May 9, 2006, at 8:56 PM, Coach Wei wrote:
Has anyone had a chance to look at this proposal? I realize there
have
been a few other threads on this list in the last week, but I'd really
be interested in getting any feedback.
Off topic of the proposal -- how is scripting a UI in XML
+1
-Brian
On May 26, 2006, at 5:11 AM, James Strachan wrote:
In accordance with the incubator release procedure (see below) the
ActiveMQ community has voted on and approved the 4.0 release binary.
We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to
perform the release.
+1
-Brian
On Jun 5, 2006, at 7:46 AM, James Strachan wrote:
We ended up recutting the binary of the 4.0 release of ActiveMQ to
address a few issues brought up in the Incubator PMC vote; I'd just
like to call another vote to explicitly approve the new binary distro
to avoid confusion (as most
]
Vote result:
The VOTE has passed with 9 ppmc +1's and no -1s.
+1 Hiram Chirino
+1 Alan D. Cabrera
+1 Adrian Co
+1 Brian McCallister
+1 Jonas Lim
+1 Bruce Snyder
+1 Fritz Oconer
+1 James Strachan
+1 Rob Davies
Release tarball:
http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0.1-RC1
On Jun 19, 2006, at 7:15 AM, Jim Hurley wrote:
This proposal seeks to create a project within the Apache Software
Foundation to continue the development and advancement of Jini
technology. It has broad backing from the Jini Community, and
includes core developers from Sun Microsystems
Just my 2 cents: I rather liked the name Heraldry as well -- thought
it was one of the more appropriate, and evocative, around =)
-Brian
On Jul 1, 2006, at 5:07 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 6/30/06, Matt Pelletier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For what it's worth, I don't have an issue with
On Jul 11, 2006, at 12:46 PM, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
IRC can be used by a podling to bring new people up to speed (e.g.
QA between available committers and interested users/contributors),
although such sessions should be archived and made available to those
not able to attend. However, using
On Jul 18, 2006, at 8:41 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Ian Holsman wrote:
if blaze's goal is to create a standardized widely available and
interoperable messaging solution (you forgot enterprise class)
why is it creating a new one, and not using JMS ?
Blaze's goal (AMQP) is to provide multple
On Jul 20, 2006, at 7:12 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 22:33 -0400, Carl Trieloff wrote:
Carl Trieloff wrote:
Sahan,
Thank you for your interest, do you mind if we do a brief call
(or email...or discuss right here on the list -- whatever your
preference)
to
+0 (I'd love to see it happen, but don't expect to be able to
contribute).
Nice folks, and anything with Upayavira, Sylvain, and Alex involved
is destined to conquer the world anyway :-)
-Brian
On Jul 26, 2006, at 8:54 AM, Upayavira wrote:
The Wicket developers
On Jul 29, 2006, at 4:45 PM, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
Does anyone have any further concerns about this proposal?
snip /
- There was also the question about how the AMQP specification will be
handled and licensed. I started this thread with my feelings about
that aspect (short version: it looks
On Aug 1, 2006, at 1:47 AM, Gordon Sim wrote:
The current working group is open to new members and is eager for
feedback from anyone.
Where are the archives of the discussions that have gotten it this
far so I can understand what is driving the process and be able to
contribute? What
On Aug 1, 2006, at 9:36 AM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
Brian,
Just as in JCP, OASIS or W3C the real work happens on private
channels, that said we are in
the process of creating public pages, from which to link user and
feedback lists for anyone to
read, access and interact with the working
On Aug 1, 2006, at 10:44 AM, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
Could you clarify whether you are asking if the Glasgow project could
continue in a different direction from the spec, or whether the spec,
itself, could be changed/forked and distributed by the ASF?
If something were to happen to cause
-1
I think that this project is premature until the spec is in an open,
inclusive process or at an acceptable standards body with compatible
licensing terms. I would embrace this project were it so.
The project is supposed to be implementations of a standard protocol
but the protocol in
AMQPD
-Brian
On Aug 9, 2006, at 1:06 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
How about Qpid? It could mean Queuing Protocol for Information
Delivery or something like that.
Carl Trieloff wrote:
+1 for Kyma easy to say, read and use in code.
Archit Shah wrote:
More name ideas for Glasgow (and maybe
On Aug 16, 2006, at 12:32 AM, James Strachan wrote:
On 8/16/06, Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The ActiveMQ committers have decided to aim for TLP status (1), as
such we need to get a PPMC in place. Thus far we have been working
under a committer votes all count style (really
Rob Davies
+1 Guillaume Nodet
+1 Alan D. Cabrera
+1 Aaron Mulder
+1 Brian McCallister
We also had 1 non ppmc +1:
+1 Kevan Miller
Release tarball:
http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0.2-RC3/
maven1/incubator-activemq/distributions/
Releases section of the Incubation Policy
On Aug 25, 2006, at 4:07 AM, Leo Simons wrote:
What does it *do*?
I believe it is basically a big, pluggable, harness for analyzing and
annotating streams of arbitrary data, if this is the same thing I
talked with a bunch of folks about (including Martin, I believe) a
couple years ago
On Aug 25, 2006, at 11:11 AM, Brian McCallister wrote:
(including Martin, I believe)
s/Martin/Marshall/g
Doh! Sorry :-)
-Brian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
-Brian
On Sep 30, 2006, at 9:09 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Cayenne community has voted and approved 2.0.1 release of Cayenne.
This release marks a major milestone in Cayenne incubation as we've
fully resolved all IP issues and got rid of incompatible license
dependencies. Now we would
+1 though I'd consider making the configure script +x in the future.
-Brian
On Nov 14, 2006, at 6:30 PM, Nathan Mittler wrote:
The ActiveMQ community has voted on the release of ActiveMQ CPP 1.0
with a
total of 6 +1's.
The source bundle for the release candidate can be found here:
+1 I have been watching the Cayenne goings-ons and am very impressed.
-Brian
On Dec 1, 2006, at 7:24 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Apache Cayenne community just voted to request graduation from the
Incubator as a TLP [1]. The text of the proposed board resolution
(adopted from iBatis
Concern:
Was there any resolution on the AMQP licensing terms (1) in relation
to making releases? I think it is okay, but how it fits into the
current draft guidelines (2) I am unsure. I think Cliff voted for
this, so I suspect it is okay. Just want to make sure :-)
Nit:
I am unable to
On Dec 11, 2006, at 2:27 AM, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
On 12/6/06, Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Concern:
Was there any resolution on the AMQP licensing terms (1) in relation
to making releases? I think it is okay, but how it fits into the
current draft guidelines (2) I am unsure. I
The Apache HTTPD project has decided (1) to import the wombat
codebase (2) and I have filled out all but one part of the ip
clearance form. The remaining part is the actual transfer of
copyright/assignment/etc. What form is correct for filling this out?
-Brian
1)
ActiveMQ
PMC:
Alan Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rob Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL
Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Rob Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED
+1
-Brian
On Jan 8, 2007, at 5:20 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
ActiveMQ would like to move to graduate to a top level project, and
that the proposal at the end of this email be presented to the
board for consideration at the next meeting.
Status File: http://incubator.apache.org/projects
Vote passes!
I'll forward the resolution to the board :-)
+1: [
Henri Yandell
Alex Karasulu
James Strachan
Davanum Srinivas
Paul Fremantle
Dain Sundstrom
Brian McCallister
Robert Burrell Donkin
David Blevins
Jason
+1
-Brian
On Jan 16, 2007, at 12:02 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
The Felix community feels that we are ready for graduation, as
indicated by the following community vote to request graduation:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-felix-dev/
200612.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
We
+1 and about time :-)
-Brian
On Feb 6, 2007, at 7:07 AM, Dave wrote:
OK, let's try this again.
The Roller community believes that Roller is ready for graduation, as
evidenced by this vote:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-roller-dev/
200702.mbox/browser
We would like to
The last code grant for the mod_wombat codebase ( http://
incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/httpd-wombat.html ) has been
recorded and I would like to move forward with the import.
Code grants and CLA's have been recorded from each person who has
contributed code.
This is a lazy-consensus
+1 From me :-)
-Brian
On Feb 13, 2007, at 3:00 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
The last code grant for the mod_wombat codebase ( http://
incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/httpd-wombat.html ) has been
recorded and I would like to move forward with the import.
Code grants and CLA's have been
On Feb 14, 2007, at 6:00 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
This is a lazy-consensus approval vote.
Huh? These types of things should require activing
voting, not lazy-consensus. Otherwise the Incubator
is worthless.
I am just quoting from the IP Clearance docs:
Fourth paragraph (if you count the
On Feb 15, 2007, at 6:54 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
search for if applicable
Using the search available here ( http://www.uspto.gov/main/
trademarks.htm ) I found nothing which looks infringing. There are
a number of wombat trademarks around, but the only one related to
software
If someone can step up to help OpenJPA I will trade off :-)
I haven't been a fantastic mentor for OpenJPA, anyway :-(
-Brian
On Apr 10, 2007, at 7:46 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I am informed that QPid has two Mentors. Would someone please
volunteer to
act as a third? QPid is an
On Apr 10, 2007, at 10:58 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
If someone can step up to help OpenJPA I will trade off :-)
I haven't been a fantastic mentor for OpenJPA, anyway :-(
(Not trying to ditch OpenJPA, just trying to open up options :-)
-Brian
I think wadi withdrew from incubation. It seems alive here: http://
wadi.codehaus.org/
?
-Brian
On Apr 15, 2007, at 2:09 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
I cross-referenced http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule
against http://incubator.apache.org/projects/ and noticed that the
+1 Good folks, good community, good code!
-Brian
On May 8, 2007, at 10:45 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Dear Incubator,
The OpenJPA podling respectfully requests the Incubator to consider
its graduation to a Top Level Project. Please vote on recommending
the attached draft board resolution.
+1
-Brian
On Jun 1, 2007, at 2:15 AM, J Aaron Farr wrote:
This is a vote to move the Heraldry project from active incubation to
'retired' status.
Earlier this year the Heraldry project was reorganized in order to
make another attempt at incubating an OpenID project. Unfortunately,
the
On Sep 17, 2007, at 5:57 AM, David L Kaminsky wrote:
Tomcat
-
We're open to suggestions regarding the order in which we add
bindings to
APIs, and doing such bindings isn't terribly hard. If Tomcat is
particularly critical as an early demonstration, we can add that to
the
+1 -- I'd offer to help as much as I can, but I know how little that
is right now :-(
Definitely support (and will probably use at least ;-)
-Brian
On Sep 18, 2007, at 12:52 PM, Olga Natkovich wrote:
Hi,
Yahoo! research and development teams have developed a proposal
below. The
+1
-Brian
On Sep 25, 2007, at 10:20 AM, Doug Cutting wrote:
I would like to call the Incubator PMC to vote to incubate the
proposed Pig project. Discussion on this list evidenced broad
interest in this project, which bodes well for its ability to build
a diverse developer community.
A subversion repository
A JIRA issue tracker
= Initial Committers =
Thomas Baker[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tim Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thomas Dudziak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martin Traverso [EMAIL PROTECTED]
= Sponsors
On Nov 9, 2007, at 11:47 AM, Leo Simons wrote:
Can we see a code dump of the stuff you'll be donating?
As soon as possible :-) I am home with a nasty fever today so...
blech. We should have the ning-specific stuff gutted out by ApacheCon
at least!
-Brian
Wow, really happy at the positive response.
I'm on my way to ATL in the morning, and am halfway healthy again, so
will try to pull out some code during hackathon.
-Brian
On Nov 9, 2007, at 10:03 AM, Brian McCallister wrote:
Shindig Proposal
--
= Abstract =
Shindig will develop
On Nov 9, 2007, at 1:34 PM, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Brian McCallister wrote:
Shindig Proposal
A big +1, and I'd happily be a mentor.
Thank you! We'll take you up on that :-)
-Brian
Sylvain
--
Sylvain Wallez - http://bluxte.net
- Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Friday, November 9, 2007 1:03:49 PM
Subject: [PROPOSAL] Shindig, an OpenSocial Container
Shindig Proposal
--
= Abstract =
Shindig will develop the container and backend
lists
A subversion repository
A JIRA issue tracker
= Initial Committers =
Andy Smith (Google)
Brian McCallister (Ning)
Brian Stoler(Google)
Cassie Doll (Google)
Dan Bentley (Google)
Dan Farino (MySpace)
David Glazer
+1 from me as well :-)
On Nov 28, 2007, at 4:59 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
This vote will run until Monday, Dec. 3, 2007.
[ ] +1 Accept Shindig for incubation
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject for the following reason :
= Abstract =
Shindig will develop a container and backend
+1: 25
0: 1
-1: 0
Looks like it passed! Woo hoo!
On Nov 28, 2007, at 4:59 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
This vote will run until Monday, Dec. 3, 2007.
[ ] +1 Accept Shindig for incubation
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject for the following reason :
= Abstract =
Shindig will develop
I've filed infra tickets for Shindig tuff to be set up :-)
On Dec 3, 2007, at 1:33 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
+1: 25
0: 1
-1: 0
Looks like it passed! Woo hoo!
On Nov 28, 2007, at 4:59 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
This vote will run until Monday, Dec. 3, 2007.
[ ] +1 Accept Shindig
+1 -- I am very excited to see this and think it will be good for CouchDB.
-Brian
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 7:40 AM, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The original source for this proposal can be found at
http://www.couchdbwiki.com/index.php?title=Apache_Incubator_Proposal
and a current
+1
-Brian
On Thu, Feb 7, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 23, 2008 9:07 PM, Mark Slee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've just posted the Apache Incubator proposal for Thrift onto the
Wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ThriftProposal
+1
-Yonik
+1
On Sat, Feb 9, 2008 at 8:09 AM, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've had an initial discussion, which attracted a number of messages
of encouragement, and identified no issues or concerns. Then we
proceeded onto a proposal, which attracted three excellent mentors.
Now it is time to
FWIW, I quite like both git and mercurial, both give me a better workflow
than subversion for a lot of things I work on. Offline commits, local
branches, and sane merging are *huge*. The approach to distributed repos is
also very nice for folks who do want to maintain a fork elsewhere (forking
Good catch, thank you!
I just added us to the third group (ie, the March group). We'll need to be
good incubatorlings and probably do our first three months of reporting a
bit late :-)
-Brian
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Just trying to help with
Sweet, I'll +1 it and probably use it :-)
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Darren Hague [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to propose ESME as a project for the Apache Incubator.
Enterprise Social Messaging Experiment (ESME) is a secure and highly
scalable microsharing and micromessaging
+1
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Jan Lehnardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Incubator General List, dear IPMC,
thank you all for your comments on whether CouchDB should graduate
from the Incubator to a top level project. I think we have your support.
On behalf of the Apache CouchDB PPMC I
I am expecting to be a mentor.
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Matthieu Riou matthieu.r...@gmail.com wrote:
If you need one more, you can count me in.
Cheers,
Matthieu
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:38 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote:
Ian Holsman wrote:
I'll be a mentor.
/repos/asf/incubator/cassandra== Issue
Tracking ==
* JIRA Cassandra
= Sponsors =
== Champion ==
* Brian McCallister== Mentors ==
* Torsten Curdt* Brian McCallister
* Matthieu Riou
* Ian Holsman
== Sponsoring Entity ==
* Incubator
, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Brian McCallister bri...@skife.org wrote:
I consider this to be a high-risk project, and agree with Martjin's
concerns, but do not consider this a bar to entering incubation. The
*reason* Cassandra wants to enter incubation is to address these
weaknesses.
+1
-Brian
On Tue
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to see some plan on dealing with the fork/community stuff. We
*know* it is a problem, and I'd like to see how this is being
addressed in the proposal. In my opinion that is the crux to this
proposal.
What ever happened to Etch?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Leif Hedstroml...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Good evening,
As you know, we've been preparing our proposal to submit Traffic Server to
the Incubator for a few weeks now. With the help from our champion (thanks
Doug!), and the entire Incubator community, it's my
inline
On Thursday, September 11, 2003, at 02:24 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Both and RDBMS and an LDAP server are databases really.
This is exactly what gets me excited. OODBMS's are basically dead (sad
as they are nice to develop on) O/R tools are getting as easy to
develop on as the
Argh, keep emailing with unsubscribed account... My apologies if a
moderator approves a clone of this message later
I wasn't so much looking for projects to put under the DB wing, but
thinking of people who might be interested in LDAPd. An LDAP most
definately is *not* an RDBMS, but it is
I wasn't so much looking for projects to put under the DB wing, but
thinking of people who might be interested in LDAPd. An LDAP most
definately is *not* an RDBMS, but it is a protocol for accessing
hierarchical databases. After filesystems and DNS, ldap's are probably
the most widely used
I wasn't so much looking for projects to put under the DB wing, but
thinking of people who might be interested in LDAPd. An LDAP most
definately is *not* an RDBMS, but it is a protocol for accessing
hierarchical databases. After filesystems and DNS, ldap's are probably
the most widely used
Hmm, how about:
Apache ctx.lookup(apache/j2ee/name);
It's unpronounceable, but so is httpd ;-)
-Brian
On Monday, December 1, 2003, at 03:42 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 01:18:15AM -0800, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
On 12/1/03 12:16 AM, Greg Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat,
Following the Axion thread and it is important that users know it is
not a regular Apache project concern -- I think this is an excellent
solution.
-Brian
On Dec 23, 2003, at 10:35 AM, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
Hello,
From the conversation here, it came to my mind that it
would be nice to
Anyone know the status of Axion's incubation? I don't see any news
since December.
-Brian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TheCortex responds on putting the Clover Jar in CVS.
-Brian
Begin forwarded message:
From: Clover Sales [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: April 28, 2004 4:19:32 AM EDT
To: Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Ticket#: 200404181013] Re: Clover license details
Hi Brian,
Yes, you can put your
Just checking in again on Axion =) Last I heard (April) we were waiting
on the final CLA and a software grant:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=incubator-generalm=108325596609966w=2
Any progress?
Also, unrelated to the ASF move -- any word on another release? 1 year
anniversary of Axion's last
As an innocent bystander of the flamewar that spawned this email:
Nicola commented on some technical changes, it started deteriorating
into shed painting, Nicola posted an email on de-escalating conflict in
technical discussions, then Stephen attacked Nicola directly for some
+1 for this incubation, either joining db or as its own TLP wearing my
DB PMC hat =)
On Aug 9, 2004, at 9:31 AM, Ted Husted wrote:
It's true that we are all database/data persistence technologies, but,
in my experience, there is much more to an Apache product than
technology. My own concern as
+1 for this incubation, either joining db or as its own TLP wearing my
DB PMC hat =)
On Aug 9, 2004, at 9:31 AM, Ted Husted wrote:
It's true that we are all database/data persistence technologies, but,
in my experience, there is much more to an Apache product than
technology. My own concern as
Sorry for the double post, guess moderator let posting from my unsubbed
account through!
-Brian
On Aug 9, 2004, at 10:10 AM, Brian McCallister wrote:
+1 for this incubation, either joining db or as its own TLP wearing my
DB PMC hat =)
On Aug 9, 2004, at 9:31 AM, Ted Husted wrote:
It's true
This sounds like a great tool! Offline synching for any JDBC compliant
database with triggers and procedures is good stuff.
Are the sources available anywhere right now?
The general steps to enter incubation are described in the document:
Agreed on the federation thing =) The point is to foster the domain
community, while best managing disparate (large) projects. I think what
XML is doing is an excellent way to approach this.
-Brian
On Aug 10, 2004, at 11:03 AM, J Aaron Farr wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted
On Aug 10, 2004, at 1:15 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
snip /
TLP reporting is a corporate structure issue, whereas
federation is about sharing resources (e.g., web-site and mail domain)
and
community building.
Exactly!
-Brian
-
+1 I think iBatis is a good fit.
-Brian
On Aug 23, 2004, at 12:52 AM, Clinton Begin wrote:
See: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IbatisProposal
[ ] Accept iBATIS into the Incubator
[ ] Reject iBATIS
Vote ends 12pm (Noon) EDT, Thursday August 26, 2004.
Clinton
If it is what I think it is... bring it in, please, ASAP. If it isn't
what I think it is... very curious.
-Brian
On Sep 30, 2004, at 8:21 PM, hammett wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We have a CLI project in the Incubator to run CLI applications (.NET
Message -
From: Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: Where proposal should be sent?
If it is what I think it is... bring it in, please, ASAP. If it isn't
what I think it is... very curious.
-Brian
+1 (non-binding)
-Brian
On Oct 18, 2004, at 5:41 PM, hammett wrote:
My non-binding vote just to bring the topic back :-D
+1
Cheers,
hammett
- Original Message - From: Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 5:30 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Proposal for
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
