On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 29.10.2012 15:22, Joachim Dreimann wrote:
Hi,
I would like to request the beginning of the vote for the second release of
Apache Bloodhound in the incubator following the successful vote by the
Bloodhound PPMC.
The
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 6, 2012 7:07 PM, Gary Martin gary.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
...
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours and therefore ends after 11pm
UTC on Thursday 9th August.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bloodhound
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
And here we return to a thread of some weeks ago. One chair can't
review all those reports and push the bounce buttons. Some other
people
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com wrote:
On Jan 7, 2012, at 1:49 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Jan 7, 2012 4:24 PM, Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com wrote:
...
The original developers are not ambivalent to this fork.
Untrue. Christian and Remy are, and always
Agreed: we don't (and shouldn't) encourage hostile forks at the ASF.
This isn't a hostile fork.
From the beginning, the intention of Bloodhound has been to be to use
the existing Trac system as much as possible and to improve upon it.
After many private (and some public) conversations with
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Hyrum K Wright
hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com wrote:
...I don't know what the proper procedure for vote counting is...
Usually you just change the subject to [RESULT][VOTE]... to make it more
obvious that you're tallying the vote, and we often list the names
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Hyrum K Wright
hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com wrote:
It seems discussion on Bloodhound has died down, so it's time to call
a VOTE. Please vote on the acceptance of Bloodhound into the Apache
Incubator.
The proposal is available at [1] and its content is also
, WANdisco
* Hyrum Wright, WANdisco
* John Chambers, WANdisco
* Gary Martin, WANdisco
* Gavin McDonald, Independent
= Sponsors =
== Champion ==
Hyrum K. Wright
== Nominated Mentors ==
* Hyrum K. Wright
* Greg Stein
== Sponsoring Entity ==
The Apache Incubator
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 3:35 AM, Gavin McDonald ga...@16degrees.com.au wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 15 December 2011 1:30 PM
To: Hyrum K Wright
Cc: general@incubator.apache.org; Ian Wild
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 2:41 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 12, 2011 3:12 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Hyrum K Wright
hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com wrote:
By it's own recognition, however, the development community
the question with legal-discuss@ would
be disrespectful of their time.
-Hyrum
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:26 AM, Hyrum K Wright
hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com wrote:
I don't know the proper answer to the licensing and patent questions.
My understanding (standard caveats apply) is that the BSD is a
Category
, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
so this is basically Trac ++ and a fork of Trac ?
Or is it a completely rewritten new approach?
just curious :)
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Hyrum K Wright hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Ian
Hello Incubator!
WANdisco would like to propose the inclusion of a new project, Apache
Bloodhound, to the Incubator. The proposal has been posted to the
wiki[1], and is also included below. We've privately discussed this
project with a number of individuals, but would now like to get the
, as well as on trac-dev, and
so far there hasn't been any discord.
Or is it a completely rewritten new approach?
Bloodhound may eventually diverge from Trac, but that's up to the
communities involved.
-Hyrum
- Original Message -
From: Hyrum K Wright hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Yep, makes sense. Like I told Benson, I wasn't exactly sure if the mirroring
system were read only downstream of the Apache root sources (IOW, I thought
we had more control then in reality we did).
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Philip M. Gollucci
pgollu...@p6m7g8.com wrote:
On 8/10/2010 10:39 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Greg Steingst...@gmail.com wrote:
It is *very* true that Infra, Legal, and (all?) ASF PMCs will be
clients/users of the tool. But
Please note, though, that that does not reflect any official pronouncement of
the Subversion development community. However, a number of the corporate
sponsors are working toward making a summer release a reality, and we welcome
whatever help folks want to give.
Getting the ASF migration out
On Jan 18, 2010, at 2:20 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 5:28 AM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
Missing:
Subversion
Hmm. Something went wrong with the automated notifier as this ball
got dropped, I guess. Subversion should have something submitted
On Dec 3, 2009, at 2:14 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Doug Cutting cutt...@apache.org wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
httpd and apr have published doxygen of their trunks periodically,
they aren't based on any release.
Were these published these on the official public
On Nov 17, 2009, at 3:11 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote:
In general, Java code at Apache should reside under a package of org.apache.
In this case, I would expect org.apache.subversion.javahl. Of course, this
will create compatibility problems. I don't know if it is completely
On Nov 16, 2009, at 1:27 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
fyi, Subversion has been migrated into the ASF repository. About 30+
committers have access and are beginning work within the ASF repo.
Below, you can see the big change to switch the licensing over to the
ASF (we were already on ALv2, so this
On Nov 12, 2009, at 9:05 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
Plan: raise an issue, and we fix it.
Not sure what else you're looking for.
I was just pointing out that if you want to do the release review
based on an existing
On Nov 10, 2009, at 9:16 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 09:59, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net wrote:
...
I certainly understand why license issues would be a concern. But I could
use an education
On Nov 10, 2009, at 10:29 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:59 PM, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net
wrote:
Subversion client and server that doesn't use a DAV layer at all. The
Subversion community has never released binaries -- ever -- not do we plan
to.
That
contrib/ has been removed from the packaging scripts, and won't ship with 1.7.
In other news, the box that builds the nightly tarballs is back online, albeit
with a new disk, so it'll take me a day or two to get it back up. When it
does, I'll point people there, and you can see what a typical
25 matches
Mail list logo
