Re: [ALL] Volunteers for a Math IPMC?

On Jun 18, 2016 2:05 PM, "Gilles" wrote: > > On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 11:00:34 -0700, Ted Dunning wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Gilles >> wrote: >> >>> ... >>> I'm asking, again, whether I need to initiate a VOTE that would

Re: [PROPOSAL] Weave for Apache Incubator

Hi, I am concerned about potential confusion with Apache Commons Weaver [1]. Matt [1] https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-weaver/ On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Andreas Neumann a...@apache.org wrote: I would like to propose Weave, an abstraction over Apache Hadoop® YARN to reduce

Re: [VOTE] BatchEE as an incubated project

+1 (binding) Matt On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote: Since discussion about the BatchEE seems done, I'd like to call a vote for BatchEE to become an incubated project. The proposal is pasted below, and also available at:

Re: [PROPOSAL] BatchEE to implement JBatch @apache

JSR 352 is part of Java EE 7, so BatchEE is IMO warranted. Plus the rhyming of Apache BatchEE is silly and fun. $0.02, Matt On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote: easybatch is used by others already. regards, gerhard 2013/9/19 Romain

Re: [PROPOSAL] BatchEE to implement JBatch @apache

clearance to fork? I think this last came up with BeanShell. John On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote: JSR 352 is part of Java EE 7, so BatchEE is IMO warranted. Plus the rhyming of Apache BatchEE is silly and fun. $0.02, Matt On Thu, Sep 19

Re: [VOTE] recommend Apache DeltaSpike for graduating out of the incubator

+1 (binding) Matt On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Hi! The Apache DeltaSpike podling is a project which contains common CDI Extensions which are portable among many different Java EE containers and even run on standalone CDI containers. We are now

Re: Shepherd for EasyAnt

On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote: On Jul 5, 2012, at 10:54 AM, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: Le 5 juil. 2012 à 06:35, Stefan Bodewig a écrit : On 2012-07-04, Dave Fisher wrote: On Jul 3, 2012, at 12:06 PM, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: Le 3 juil. 2012 à 19:00,

Re: Fw: [VOTE] Release Apache DeltaSpike-0.2-incubating

On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Hi IPMC folks! I'd like to call the 2nd round (IPMC review/vote) for our DeltaSpike-0.2-incubating release! See the attached thread for the release artifacts and the podling VOTE results. We have 14 +1 inclucing 2

Re: [VOTE] Jukka Zitting for IPMC Chair (was Re: NOMINATIONS for Incubator PMC Chair)

On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: Hi Folks, OK there has been enough discussion here. It's time to VOTE for a new IPMC chair and it looks like the remaining folks (including me) that were in the running have aligned beyond the

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache BVal as a TLP

On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com wrote: Hi... On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote: Is this a discussion thread or a vote thread

Re: [VOTE] Apache BVal as a TLP

On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din mn...@apache.org wrote: Hi...   It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache BVal, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it is time or not, [1], [2] and [3]. In the past few weeks there has been a

Re: [VOTE] Release DeltaSpike 0.1-incubating

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Gerhard Petracek gpetra...@apache.org wrote: Hi, This is the first incubator release for Apache DeltaSpike, with the artifacts being versioned as 0.1-incubating. We have received 16 binding +1 votes (including 4 votes of IPMC members) during the release

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache BVal as a TLP

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote: Is this a discussion thread or a vote thread?  If it is a vote thread please restart it with [VOTE]. If you want to discuss whether the project should graduate then we can do that. This is a quick (formal)

DeltaSpike IP clarifications

Hi, all--per [1], Generally, the mentors of a new project will need to consult with general@incubator.apache.org or the Apache legal team about the particular circumstances. So, here I am. The situation can be read in detail at [2], but in short is this: DeltaSpike is intended to amalgamate best

Re: DeltaSpike IP clarifications

] http://planet.jboss.org/post/seam_next_announcement 2012/1/16 Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com It may also be pertinent to note that the codebases here in question are also ALv2 licensed. Matt On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Matt Benson mben...@apache.org wrote: Hi, all--per [1

IP clearance for compatibly-licensed software WAS Re: DeltaSpike IP clarifications

This thread brings up another issue. During this process we have encountered the sentiment that the ASF's insistence on (arguably) extensive documentation to import e.g. ALv2-licensed code seems to express a lack of confidence in its own license on the part of the ASF. My response has been,

Re: IP clearance for compatibly-licensed software WAS Re: DeltaSpike IP clarifications

, or variants of it. Ralph On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote: This thread brings up another issue.  During this process we have encountered the sentiment that the ASF's insistence on (arguably) extensive documentation to import e.g. ALv2-licensed code

Re: DeltaSpike IP clarifications

Adding deltaspike-dev back to the distribution: On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Gerhard Petracek gpetra...@apache.org wrote: ok - matt and i just had a short talk with sam to ensure that we are talking about the same. it isn't the only way, but to resolve it once and for all it's easier to

Re: DeltaSpike IP clarifications

codebases; thus a software grant is a bit of overkill, but saves committers having to disclaim each commit as clause 7 would do. On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote: Adding deltaspike-dev back to the distribution: On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Gerhard

Re: DeltaSpike IP clarifications

It may also be pertinent to note that the codebases here in question are also ALv2 licensed. Matt On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Matt Benson mben...@apache.org wrote: Hi, all--per [1], Generally, the mentors of a new project will need to consult with general@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Recommend graduating Apache Bean-Validation (BVAL) as a TLP

On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 5:08 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, +1 to graduate, with the following note: On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and

Re: [VOTE] Recommend graduating Apache Bean-Validation (BVAL) as a TLP

+1 Matt On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Dear IPMC, dear Community! The Apache Bean-Validation project provides an ALv2 licensed implementation of the JSR-303 Bean Validation Specification and would like to start a VOTE on graduating as a TLP. The

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Bean Validation as a TLP

+1 Matt On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din mn...@apache.org wrote: Hi...   It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache Bean Validation, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it is time or not, [1], [2] and [3]. In the past few

Re: [VOTE] DeltaSpike to join the Incubator

Blevins     * Matthias Wessendorf     * Matt Benson Sponsoring Entity     * Apache MyFaces PMC Project Name While DeltaSpike is intended to be used as the project’s code name during the incubation  process, it is intended that we will solicit suggestions from

Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Dec 2011 ([ppmc])

That would explain why he claimed to have mailed BeanValidation-dev, and our yet having failed AFAIK to receive the notification. Matt On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote: Same thing on empire-db-dev@ I suppose Marvin (bot) somehow mailed the wrong

Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Dec 2011 ([ppmc])

On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote: That would explain why he claimed to have mailed BeanValidation-dev, and our yet having failed AFAIK to receive the notification. Er, strike that--we got it after all. Matt On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Francis De

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache DeltaSpike - CDI-Extensions project

Mmm, shouldn't voting be carried out in a separate [VOTE] Accept DeltaSpike... thread? Matt On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: +1 (binding) -Matthias On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: +1 (binding) PS:

Re: Mentoring projects

Certainly you can... typically you would drop a mail requesting membership in the Incubator PMC to go along with your mentor status, on this very list IIRC. Matt On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: Hi all guys, this mail for asking for clarification

Re: [VOTE] Release Bean Validation 0.3-incubating

On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:38 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 7 April 2011 18:14, Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote: This is the third release of Apache Bean Validation. We have already received 4 binding IPMC votes during the PPMC voting below, so I'm requesting a 72 hour lazy consensus

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenNLP for incubation

On Nov 19, 2010, at 3:48 AM, Jörn Kottmann wrote: Hi, lets vote on the acceptance of the OpenNLP Project for incubation at the Apache Incubator. The proposal is on the wiki http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenNLPProposal and a copy is included below. The discussion thread can be

Re: [DISCUSS] Poddling new committer process

On Nov 12, 2010, at 2:20 AM, ant elder wrote: I'd like to propose that the process for Incubator poddlings to make someone a new committer is simplified so that all that is needed are votes from poddling committers and that there is no longer any need for votes from Incubator PMC members or

Re: [VOTE] experimental delegation of new committer votes to PPMC

On Aug 18, 2010, at 6:11 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: Now that the board has declared there are no legal obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to restart the vote. +1 -Matt Thanks for your patience and consideration. - Original Message From: Joe Schaefer

Re: an experiment

On Aug 11, 2010, at 4:14 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: - Original Message From: Davanum Srinivas dava...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Wed, August 11, 2010 5:07:33 PM Subject: Re: an experiment +1 to IPMC delegates to the PPMC the decision-making process for

Re: Commons issues WAS RE: [PROPOSAL] Commons Incubator

--- On Thu, 4/16/09, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote: From: Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org Subject: Re: Commons issues WAS RE: [PROPOSAL] Commons Incubator To: general@incubator.apache.org Date: Thursday, April 16, 2009, 4:47 AM On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Matt Benson

RE: Commons issues WAS RE: [PROPOSAL] Commons Incubator

--- On Thu, 4/16/09, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote: From: Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com Subject: RE: Commons issues WAS RE: [PROPOSAL] Commons Incubator To: general@incubator.apache.org Date: Thursday, April 16, 2009, 11:30 AM Matt Benson wrote: I'll apologize in advance

Re: PROPOSAL to graduate Sanselan into Commons Incubator

Two comments: (1) A Commons Incubator in the form put forth in the incubation proposal of the same name does not seem likely to happen, given the feedback on this list so far. (2) If Commons would accept Sanselan, it having already been through the incubator would graduate as a proper, or

Re: Commons issues WAS RE: [PROPOSAL] Commons Incubator

--- On Tue, 4/14/09, Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote: From: Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Commons issues WAS RE: [PROPOSAL] Commons Incubator To: general@incubator.apache.org Date: Tuesday, April 14, 2009, 1:22 AM On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 4:42 AM,

Commons issues WAS RE: [PROPOSAL] Commons Incubator

. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote: From: Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Commons Incubator To: general@incubator.apache.org Date: Sunday, April 12, 2009, 9:49 PM Justin Erenkrantz wrote: Matt Benson gudnabr...@yahoo.com wrote: The Commons Incubator would act

Re: [PROPOSAL] Commons Incubator

--- On Fri, 4/10/09, Torsten Curdt tcu...@apache.org wrote: From: Torsten Curdt tcu...@apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Commons Incubator To: general@incubator.apache.org Date: Friday, April 10, 2009, 5:32 AM Well, the point is: we are talking about small libraries. Imagine there

[PROPOSAL] Commons Incubator

(Applicable at incubating component level) AFFILIATIONS (Applicable at incubating component level) SPONSORS Champion: Henri Yandell Nominated Mentors: Henri Yandell, Matt Benson(, need volunteer/s) Sponsoring Entity: Commons PMC April 9, 2009

Fw: Commons Incubator proposal

Oops; accidentally sent to general-subscribe: --- On Tue, 4/7/09, Matt Benson gudnabr...@yahoo.com wrote: From: Matt Benson gudnabr...@yahoo.com Subject: Commons Incubator proposal To: incubator-general general-subscr...@incubator.apache.org Cc: priv...@commons.apache.org Date: Tuesday

site updated

...for IP clearance; could someone push the updated site out to p.a.o? Thanks, Matt - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[IP CLEARANCE] commons-flatfile

The Commons PMC have voted [1] to accept a contribution [2] of a Java library for the handling of flat data structures. The required paperwork has been recorded by the ASF Secretary, and the IP form completed in the incubator website [3]. Please inform me of any issues you see. [1]

Re: seeking clarification wrt ip-clearance processes

(e.g. tlp/import next to tlp/trunk) just to make sure it isn't accidentally shipped. Thanks for the info, Craig! -Matt Of course, running RAT on the release would catch it but still... Craig On Sep 9, 2008, at 7:47 PM, Matt Benson wrote: I am processing the IP clearance

Multiple hats for members wrt a podling

I'm looking for general feedback about the group's perception of incubated projects and the number of roles that may be assumed by a foundation member in one. Can I view RAT as an example that it would be considered kosher for a member to be both champion of and an initial committer on a given

Re: Multiple hats for members wrt a podling

Thanks all for the responses received so far (as well as any yet to come)! -Matt --- Yoav Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 31, 2008 2:36 PM, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 31, 2008 9:20 PM, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm looking for general feedback about

Re: [Vote] Accept JRS project for incubation

Another non-binding +1 here. -Matt --- Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 (non-binding) Martijn -- Wicket joins the Apache Software Foundation as Apache Wicket Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket Wicket 1.2.6 contains a very important fix. Download

Re: [Proposal] Java Resource Simulator (JRS)

--- robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/25/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From an incubator point of view, I think having the sources available is not yet necessary. Having a clear proposal what the project is going to do, and who is going to do it is