New bootstrap CSS messes up display of all internal name definitions

2011-10-11 Thread sebb
The new CSS changes the default setting for links, by removing underlines unless the mouse hovers over the link. However, this has broken all the internal name definitions. These now look like links - they are blue, and get underlined when hovered over. See for example [1] where the table

Re: New bootstrap CSS messes up display of all internal name definitions

2011-10-11 Thread Francis De Brabandere
Should be possible as described here: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/selector.html#attribute-selectors not sure on browser compatibility though On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:50 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: The new CSS changes the default setting for links, by removing underlines unless the mouse

Re: New bootstrap CSS messes up display of all internal name definitions

2011-10-11 Thread sebb
On 11 October 2011 20:59, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote: Should be possible as described here: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/selector.html#attribute-selectors not sure on browser compatibility though Thanks very much! Works for me with FireFox, Opera, Chrome, IE. I'll update

Re: New bootstrap CSS messes up display of all internal name definitions

2011-10-11 Thread Christian Grobmeier
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:50 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: The new CSS changes the default setting for links, by removing underlines unless the mouse hovers over the link. However, this has broken all the internal name definitions. These now look like links - they are blue, and get

Re: New bootstrap CSS messes up display of all internal name definitions

2011-10-11 Thread Christian Grobmeier
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:39 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 11 October 2011 20:59, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote: Should be possible as described here: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/selector.html#attribute-selectors not sure on browser compatibility though Thanks very

Re: New bootstrap CSS messes up display of all internal name definitions

2011-10-11 Thread sebb
On 11 October 2011 21:40, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:50 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: The new CSS changes the default setting for links, by removing underlines unless the mouse hovers over the link. However, this has broken all the internal

Re: New bootstrap CSS messes up display of all internal name definitions

2011-10-11 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Is there any reason why we should not format: h2 a {  text-decoration: none;  color: black; } Would need to be applied to h3 etc as well. h2 a, h3 a, h4 a, h5 a {  text-decoration: none;  color: black; } It would also hide links in headings (if there are any) Have not found a single

Re: New bootstrap CSS messes up display of all internal name definitions

2011-10-11 Thread sebb
On 11 October 2011 21:48, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: Is there any reason why we should not format: h2 a {  text-decoration: none;  color: black; } Would need to be applied to h3 etc as well. h2 a, h3 a, h4 a, h5 a {  text-decoration: none;  color: black; } It

Re: New bootstrap CSS messes up display of all internal name definitions

2011-10-11 Thread Christian Grobmeier
h2 a, h3 a, h4 a, h5 a {  text-decoration: none;  color: black; } It would also hide links in headings (if there are any) Have not found a single one. Besides, it would be really nasty to put links into headings imho It's not just ones in headings that are affected; any instance of a

Re: New bootstrap CSS messes up display of all internal name definitions

2011-10-11 Thread sebb
On 11 October 2011 22:03, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: h2 a, h3 a, h4 a, h5 a {  text-decoration: none;  color: black; } It would also hide links in headings (if there are any) Have not found a single one. Besides, it would be really nasty to put links into headings imho

Re: New bootstrap CSS messes up display of all internal name definitions

2011-10-11 Thread Christian Grobmeier
The ones I noticed were in headings, but there could now (or in the future) be other instances that are not in headings. well, I *hope* this will not be the case. Otherwise there will be exceptions on the page which finally leads into chaos. Not sure I follow. No worries, my comment was