On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 3:35 AM, Gavin McDonald ga...@16degrees.com.au wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 15 December 2011 1:30 PM
To: Hyrum K Wright
Cc: general@incubator.apache.org; Ian Wild
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache
-Original Message-
From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 15 December 2011 1:30 PM
To: Hyrum K Wright
Cc: general@incubator.apache.org; Ian Wild
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Bloodhound
The discussion has been minimal, and has ramped down. Time to move
The discussion has been minimal, and has ramped down. Time to move to a
vote?
(I had hoped to see some people volunteer...)
Cheers,
-g
On Dec 2, 2011 10:53 AM, Hyrum K Wright hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com wrote:
Hello Incubator!
WANdisco would like to propose the inclusion of a new project,
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 2:41 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 12, 2011 3:12 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Hyrum K Wright
hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com wrote:
By it's own recognition, however, the development community
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Hyrum K Wright
hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com wrote:
By it's own recognition, however, the development community
surrounding Trac has largely dissipated, with little mailing list
traffic, and very few commits to the source code repository (see [2]).
Private
On Dec 12, 2011 3:12 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Hyrum K Wright
hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com wrote:
By it's own recognition, however, the development community
surrounding Trac has largely dissipated, with little mailing list
Marvin Humphrey wrote on Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 10:55:39 -0800:
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 12:22:28PM -0500, Greg Stein wrote:
There are three types of code that will go into the final Apache
Bloodhound release:
1) the original stuff from Edgewall
2) the pre-packaged popular plugins from
@incubator.apache.org; dennis.hamil...@acm.org
Cc: Mark Struberg; Ian Wild; Greg Stein; hwri...@apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Bloodhound
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Uh, here's the TRAC License: http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 12:22:28PM -0500, Greg Stein wrote:
There are three types of code that will go into the final Apache
Bloodhound release:
1) the original stuff from Edgewall
2) the pre-packaged popular plugins from third-parties
3) original code committed here at the ASF
The code
, 2011 18:38
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Mark Struberg; Ian Wild; Greg Stein
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Bloodhound
I suggest legal-discuss@ is involved to answer it. Although it is Cat
A license, I don't think it is fully kosher, as we promise that the
original contributor hasn't
To: general@incubator.apache.org; dennis.hamil...@acm.org
Cc: Mark Struberg; Ian Wild; Greg Stein; hwri...@apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Bloodhound
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Uh, here's the TRAC License: http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki
I don't know the proper answer to the licensing and patent questions.
My understanding (standard caveats apply) is that the BSD is a
Category A license, and as software distributed under it may be
included in ASF software such as Bloodhound. I'm unsure what the
concern about BSD notices in source
I suggest legal-discuss@ is involved to answer it. Although it is Cat
A license, I don't think it is fully kosher, as we promise that the
original contributor hasn't submarined any patents, but BSD doesn't
state this. Maybe it is a tiny point, but more eyes from
legal-discuss@ won't hurt...
On
and I have some
small projects there.)
-Original Message-
From: Niclas Hedhman [mailto:nic...@hedhman.org]
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 18:38
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Mark Struberg; Ian Wild; Greg Stein
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Bloodhound
I suggest legal-discuss
so this is basically Trac ++ and a fork of Trac ?
Or is it a completely rewritten new approach?
just curious :)
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Hyrum K Wright hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Ian Wild ian.w...@wandisco.com; Greg Stein
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
so this is basically Trac ++ and a fork of Trac ?
Pretty much. It's Trac plus a number of commonly used plugins plus
additional functionality. There's been some discussion about this
with the principles on the Trac
SO, IIUIC, the first step is to import TRAC, and we will have
primarily a BSD codebase as the main body of code?
Does this mean that all BSD notices in source files must live in ASF
repository for all eternity, assuming that we are allowed to
sublicense into ALv2 (which I think is no problem)?
And
17 matches
Mail list logo
