I think it's time for it as well. Oracle, DB2, Sybase are planning on
cashing in even bigger now. The .com crazy is over and people are going to
start to develop and market information rich websites and services that
reach out to cell phones/PDA's etc.
There hasn't been much i
There is a pretty good Java SQL Relational DB called Mckoi, but the darn
thing is GPL and I have sent about 6 emails trying to get them to change the
license to an ASL or equivalent, but I have had no luck. They won't even
change to LGPL.
hsql Database on sourceforge has a good license and works
Cory L Hubert wrote:
>
> Why not. A relational/ohject database. One that may be queried with
> standard SQL and OQL. It should probably work with the up and coming Sun
> Microsystems JDO spec.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tal Dayan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturda
Why not. A relational/ohject database. One that may be queried with
standard SQL and OQL. It should probably work with the up and coming Sun
Microsystems JDO spec.
-Original Message-
From: Tal Dayan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2001 5:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PR
Does Jakarta has anything close to an embedded pure Java
relational data base ?
If not, a project like that will be a great
addition to the Jakarta family.
Tal
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional com
+1 (back at home recovering from J1).
Craig
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Ted Husted wrote:
> Was there a post with a [VOTE] header?
>
> +1
>
> I think Craig and Geir are tied up with Java One this week.
>
> Jon Stevens wrote:
> >
> > Re: Lucene being added as a Jakarta Project.
> >
> > 5 of 10 (n
Did you consider that we were out of functional email reach?
+1 from me - I haven't used it, but it comes highly recommended from a
source I trust (besides you...)
geir
Jon Stevens wrote:
>
> Re: Lucene being added as a Jakarta Project.
>
> 5 of 10 (not counting Duncan) of the PMC members vot
