RE: EJB = bad = MS.net

Austin: I don't think I can properly understand your syntax. I'll try to interpret it as best I can. You seem to imply that, just because there's an open implementation, the EJB spec is open. That is simply not true. In fact, the JBoss team cannot certify their product as "J2EE compliant", since

RE: Apache Manual (was ApacheForge)

Title: RE: Apache Manual (was ApacheForge) Done. It might go in jakarta-site2/site. I added a short introduction, that should be replaced by someone more knowledgeable. Un saludo, Alex. > -Mensaje original- > De: Jon Scott Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: jueves

Sun and Licensing issues

Hi, There seems to be a lot of confusion about Apaches stance regarding the JCP/Sun entity and its licensing practices. I have heard a few different opinions ranging from Sun "the evil empire" is doing bad things to "the whiny" Apache people are whining about being abused by Sun. Whatever. He

Re: EJB = bad = MS.net

No, I wouldn't say that the combination of Struts and EJB is problem prone. The problems lie mainly with EJB and are in the following areas.. 1) EJBs are only useful/applicable is certain situations. Incorrect use of EJBs (i.e. dictated by management when inappropriate) is a source of a lot of

Tomcat 4.0.2 bug?

It seems your Bugzilla db is broken. I didn't know to whom this should be reported, so... I just installed Tomcat 4.0.2, replacing 4.0.1. Now 4.0.2 differs significantly from 4.0.1 in class loader behavior. In 4.0.1, a classpath whose WEB-INF had /classes and /lib subdirectories would get an e

RE: Tomcat 4.0.2 bug?

Take this to [EMAIL PROTECTED], they can help you. Randy PS There are a lot of people using TC 4.02 and they don't report this behavior. > -Original Message- > From: Carl Meredith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 9:46 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: EJB = bad = MS.net [People are stupid!]

I think the biggest problem is with developers. I've been involved with several EJB projects, and have watched many other EJB projects from the side lines. Many EJB projects are highly successful, and use the technology very appropriately. In these cases EJBs were utilized correctly (in conj

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/ down?

File not found with Bugzilla -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

BUGZILLA IS DOWN : PIER IS WORKING ON IT (was Re:http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/ down?)

On 2/22/02 5:21 PM, "Ricky Leung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > File not found with Bugzilla Yes - bugzilla is down. Pier is working on it. It will be back up sometime this weekend. -- Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] System and Software Consulting "The

RE: Apache Manual (was ApacheForge)

Actually, there is searching. See the "Search Apache Sites" link at: http://jakarta.apache.org/ Maybe we need a nice textbox for searching at every page! (Hey, don't look at mee!) Have fun, Paulo > -Original Message- > From: James Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, F

RE: EJB = bad = MS.net [People are stupid!]

With EJB you complicate the deployment, slow down the performance and save nothing except looking for middleware modules. Gee, I just don't know where I'd find a connection pool or a logger or a single phase transaction management system. Good thing I have Weblogic to save me so much time. I'm