-1.
Jakarta already has two webapp frameworks and I do not see any reason to
add another. It is great that Tapestry uses several jakarta
technologies; I would like to see some evidence of the Tapestry
community being involved in the jakarta projects of which it makes use.
One other warning
Those evaluating re-orgs should revisit Christopher Alexander's Pattern Language,
the inspiration for Gabriel's Patterns of Software and OO design patterns:
From
http://www.patternlanguage.com/leveltwo/patternsframegreen.htm?/leveltwo/../apl/twopanelnlb.htm
:
---
The language begins with
John McNally wrote:
-1.
Jakarta already has two webapp frameworks and I do not see any reason to
add another.
It is a non-goal of Jakarta to have only one webapp framework, or to
limit itself to two.
- Sam Ruby
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:general-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
Just my 2c.. If they have a strong community and meet the
requirements... Cool.
I think I'll go read their mail archives at let you know how much of it
I think is being developed by one guy. (I mean if all of those people
submitted a trivial patch suddenly the day before this proposal was put
I think you'll find good news when you read the mailing list. A year ago, I
wouldn't have tried to move Tapestry to Jakarta, because the community
wasn't strong enough, but now it seems like participation is there, with
more people contributing ideas and code. It's also gratifying when users
ask
On Sat, 2002-10-19 at 12:06, Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote:
I think you'll find good news when you read the mailing list. A year ago, I
wouldn't have tried to move Tapestry to Jakarta, because the community
wasn't strong enough, but now it seems like participation is there, with
more people
Hi -- I wish to report a bug in your batch file ant.bat with regards to
Windows9x. I'm running a Windows98 SE installation here and when I
downloaded Ant, I put it in C:\Ant and inserted in my autoexec.bat file in a
path statement C:\Ant\Bin and also a
SET ANT_HOME=C:\ANT as per your
So could someone clarify that for me... We're here to promote community
software developmentas long as they don't overlap? sorry I totally
misunderstood the apache way. (especially with all the overlapping
projects to the contrary)
-Andy
On Sat, 2002-10-19 at 14:29, John McNally wrote:
On
At 11:29 AM 10/19/2002 -0700, John McNally wrote:
If a project is proposed that overlaps a (or a few) current project, I
just think the bar needs to be a bit higher for approval. If someone
proposed another java regex package, I think many people would want to
see distinguishing features and
John McNally wrote:
If a project is proposed that overlaps a (or a few) current project, I
just think the bar needs to be a bit higher for approval.
With that clarification, I agree.
- Sam Ruby
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:general-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
For additional
On 19/10/02 19:49, Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So could someone clarify that for me... We're here to promote community
software developmentas long as they don't overlap? sorry I totally
misunderstood the apache way. (especially with all the overlapping
projects to the
on 2002/10/19 4:22 PM, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to start a new project for a new Servlet Container that is not
Tomcat! :-) Let's see how many fans I'm going to get! :-)
Pier
Yea, let's see if we can move Jetty under Jakarta.
=)
-jon
--
StudioZ.tv /\
-Original Message-
From: Jon Scott Stevens [mailto:jon;latchkey.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 4:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Tapestry joins Jakarta
on 2002/10/19 4:22 PM, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to start a new project
I have taken a closer look at Tapestry and it does provide a quite a
different strategy for web application development than Turbine and
probably also Struts. It's very well documented and the code looks well
written also. I would be willing to drop my -1; I would like to hear a
comparison with
On Sun, 20 Oct 2002 09:40, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
on 2002/10/19 4:22 PM, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to start a new project for a new Servlet Container that is not
Tomcat! :-) Let's see how many fans I'm going to get! :-)
Pier
Yea, let's see if we can move Jetty
On Sun, 20 Oct 2002 10:31, John McNally wrote:
It seems like a similar idea, or am I wrong? I liked the idea of spfc.
Though the change in perspective needed to think of a webapp in terms of
event driven components was considered too great a stretch, I guess. Is
such an approach gaining more
On Sun, 20 Oct 2002 02:06, Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote:
Benevolent dictatorship. Probably should have expanded on this. Without
a formal comittee or voting system, I've reserved the right to ultimately
decide what goes into the framework and what doesn't.
Start changing now. I don't know
On 20/10/02 0:40, Jon Scott Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 2002/10/19 4:22 PM, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to start a new project for a new Servlet Container that is not
Tomcat! :-) Let's see how many fans I'm going to get! :-)
Pier
Yea, let's see if we can
18 matches
Mail list logo
