> 6. Personally, I do not think the i18n issue is not only related to java
> but also to all the *language*s. So, I suggested, "you do not have
> to adhere to jakarta, IMHO".
I do not think -> I do think :-)
Sincerely,
-- Tetsuya ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
On Mon, 07 Jul 2003 08:14:06 -0400
(Subject: Re: [i18n] Internationalization subproject sponsor?)
Robert Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am surprised there isn't more interest in a common internationalization
> framework within Jakarta. But then I have been assuming that there
> are non-En
JSR-173 fits very well with the cursor-style strategy on the store.
This is especially true of 173's XmlStreamReader interface - it
can avoid object creation when iterating through XML. We've been
closely reviewing the JSR and providing feedback to the EG.
173 hasn't gone final yet, but we'll be
FWIW i think that the original arguments which lead to the creation of the
vendors page are still relevant. it's very hard for any folks here to
judge the merit (or otherwise) of companies providing support. on the
other hand, there was a definite demand from users and vendors for a
dating serv
Aleksander Slominski wrote:
> did you consider "fail quickly" approach that is used in Java
> collections (so for example Iterator can detect if it is used
> from more
> than one thread and fails if it happens)? the other
> possibility would be
> to allow making some objects (such as configur
Never mind I found the URL and the proposal.
-Rob
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert Simpson wrote:
Andrew,
In one sentence, it "intends" to provide a framework for internationalization of Java projects, within the Apache/Jakarta projects themselves and for users of the Apache/Jakarta code outside Apache.
I am sorry for jumping in late to this thread. How does this propos
If Cliff is able to communicate BEA's preference, and the LGPL Piccolo
issue is resolved, it seems like we're heading somewhere. Attracting
new committers is easier when the project is already under incubation.
Agreed.
-
To un
Tetsuya Kitahata,
The "Incubation Process" document on the web site had indicated that the sponsor
should come from the project that the "incubating" code would eventually be promoted
into. Since trying to make use of Jakarta code is where I noticed the missing piece,
that's the most obvious p
Andrew,
In one sentence, it "intends" to provide a framework for internationalization of Java
projects, within the Apache/Jakarta projects themselves and for users of the
Apache/Jakarta code outside Apache.
I had started out trying to see where I could make use of the Jakarta code, and
elimina
On 6/07/2003 16:56 Aleksander Slominski wrote:
It seems that BEA folks are willing to solve all remaining problems and
I think that it would be good if this project quickly gained more
mementum and I am willing to help with it (even though I am not Apache
XML commiter)
This proposal is still la
Thanks to all of you for the many offers to help us get things
started with XMLBeans. It sounds like it might be easier for everyone
if we now pick one project that we believe would be the best fit for
XMLBeans. From talking with a few committers, I think we are leaning
towards the XML project,
12 matches
Mail list logo
