On 6/9/06, Ido M. Tamir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
since 24hrs I was not able to subscribe with the
link given here:
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail2.html#Tapestry
This is what I get:
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at apache.org.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to
It makes sense that people want to be careful about a tl subdomain. Some of
the projects you mentioned are fairly staple diets to a good majority of
development projects. (ie struts/logging/xml/commons/etc) .
What would go into testing.apache.org? I'm all for it as testing in general
has to be
On Friday 09 June 2006 12:34, Martin Cooper wrote:
On 6/9/06, Ido M. Tamir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you check out the link here:
http://tapestry.apache.org/mail-lists.html
you will see that (a) it's 'users' rather than 'user', and (b) it's
tapestry.apache.org instead of
Sorry, documentation was wrong. (am fixing and deploying now)
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 6/9/06, Ido M. Tamir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 09 June 2006 12:34, Martin Cooper wrote:
On 6/9/06, Ido M. Tamir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you check out the link here:
On 6/6/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jun 2006, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
snip/
Per the umbrella concern, the question then becomes what -- if any --
are the mitigating factors that can address such a concern with
regards to this proposal. Based on Hen's email, seems
On 6/9/06, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
snip/
Per the umbrella concern, the question then becomes what -- if any --
are the mitigating factors that can address such a concern with
regards to this proposal. Based on Hen's email, seems like the ball is
still in
You may want to pull in someone from the webwork/struts (I don't know what
it's called right now) project. Specifically - Patrick Lightbody is pretty
active in the area of testing so getting him to dump in thoughts might help.
You also have ibm and what they are doing in atf-dev @ eclipse. Not
