On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
Thanks, Dennis. That helps and I agree with your arguments for inheritence
in genera;.
But why a Jakarta parent?
I'll leave that one for Henri to answer.
Do I look like I know what I'm doing? :)
The Jakarta pom is there be
Torsten Curdt wrote:
But if you argue into that direction -no matter how often this has
been discussed already- I would rather question the idea of an
umbrella PMC then... (*ducks*)
Time and energy to express the ideas you have in that direction ?
Mvgr,
Martin
-
Phil Steitz wrote:
Thanks, Dennis. That helps and I agree with your arguments for inheritence in
genera;.
But why a Jakarta parent?
I'll leave that one for Henri to answer.
And can you answer the second question about addressing? I am -0 on doing anything that
cements "Jakarta" into the
Thanks, Dennis. That helps and I agree with your arguments for inheritence in
genera;.
But why a Jakarta parent? And can you answer the second question about
addressing? I am -0 on doing anything that cements "Jakarta" into the
namespace above commons artifacts. Sorry if this has been disc
Phil Steitz wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
First few commit messages bounced on this btw, until I fixed that up.
It's a maven2
Hen,
Can you enlighten the rest of us as to what this is for and what, if
any, implications it has on how we address maven2 artifacts originating
in jakarta projects?
Ph
Henri Yandell wrote:
>
> First few commit messages bounced on this btw, until I fixed that up.
> It's a maven2
Hen,
Can you enlighten the rest of us as to what this is for and what, if
any, implications it has on how we address maven2 artifacts originating
in jakarta projects?
Phil
> parent pom f
