On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 10:20 -0700, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Sadly a bit too late to make the next board meeting I suspect.
>
> However, here's a vote for Commons to officially request that it move to TLP.
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/TLPResolution
>
> Please add your name if you'
Turbine vote is finished and we are ready to go. Our TLP proposal is on
the Turbine Wiki, it is the same as the template (except that we have a
single superflous "is" in it. Everyone who finds it, can keep it).
POI vote is still running AFAIK.
So please, add the Turbine TLP proposal to the board
> [X] -1 I'm opposed to the proposal because...
diffing the Wiki text against the template in SVN
(https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/templates/subproject-tlp-resolution.txt)
shows significant differences. I'd like you to update the proposal
accordingly. As this proposal will n
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Henri Yandell wrote:
However, here's a vote for Commons to officially request that it move to
TLP.
+1
Nick
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I have to use mspowerpoint parser plugin of the nutch. How can I build it
in eclipse. I tried to build it but I can't link the hadoop jar file from
the nutch lib directory to eclipse. I am very much confused. Please help me.
Thanks and Regards
Revathy
--
View this message in context:
h
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Martin van den Bemt wrote:
The 16th of May is the next board meeting, so I was wondering if you
were all ready to go TLP at this stage or if you prefer to wait for next
months board meeting ?
I think we are. The only thing is that our vote doesn't finish until
Friday, so w
On 5/9/07, Henning Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [X] -1 I'm opposed to the proposal because...
diffing the Wiki text against the template in SVN
(https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/templates/subproject-tlp-resolution.txt)
shows significant differences. I'd like
Don't know about POI, Turbine is fine, Scott used the right template.
Best regards
Henning
Henri Yandell schrieb:
> On 5/9/07, Henning Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > [X] -1 I'm opposed to the proposal because...
>>
>> diffing the Wiki text against the tem
+1
On 5/8/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
Niall
On 5/8/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sadly a bit too late to make the next board meeting I suspect.
>
> However, here's a vote for Commons to officially request that it move to TLP.
>
> http://wiki.apache.or
This came up on commons-dev when we were discussing the idea:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jakarta-commons-dev/200704.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
My reply was:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jakarta-commons-dev/200704.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
The hard part, as you pointed out,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+1
Henri Yandell wrote:
> [ ] +1 I support the proposal
> [ ] +0 I don't care
> [ ] -1 I'm opposed to the proposal because...
Bye, Thomas.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
iEYEARECAAYFAkZCAcQACgkQLrlGgoiBdALLHACfXHNOdEk
It would be nice if the proposal allowed for some flexibility as to language.
We do have several ASF products written in C#, and the notion of
starting a C# commons has come up a couple of times in discussions
between open source C# developers.
-Ted.
On 5/8/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
I think this was discussed before and the consensus was "we will change
the charter if a C# project actually shows up". Jakarta is dying because
there is not enough adhesion between the projects. The binding element
of the commons TLP is currently "we are developing Java components". If
there
+1
Oliver
2007/5/8, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Sadly a bit too late to make the next board meeting I suspect.
However, here's a vote for Commons to officially request that it move to TLP.
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/TLPResolution
Please add your name if you're a Common
Henri Yandell wrote:
> Sadly a bit too late to make the next board meeting I suspect.
>
> However, here's a vote for Commons to officially request that it move
> to TLP.
>
>http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/TLPResolution
>
> Please add your name if you're a Commons developer and haven't
> I am not a Jakarta commiter, and also vote is not binding, but I want
> to ask something. What are the benefits for commons of moving to a
You are a Jakarta committer :)
Mvgr,
Martin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 5/10/07, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am not a Jakarta commiter, and also vote is not binding, but I want
> to ask something. What are the benefits for commons of moving to a
You are a Jakarta committer :)
Mvgr,
Martin
-
+1
Scott
Henri Yandell wrote:
Sadly a bit too late to make the next board meeting I suspect.
However, here's a vote for Commons to officially request that it move
to TLP.
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/TLPResolution
Please add your name if you're a Commons developer and haven't
+1
Yegor
> Sadly a bit too late to make the next board meeting I suspect.
> However, here's a vote for Commons to officially request that it move to TLP.
> http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/TLPResolution
> Please add your name if you're a Commons developer and haven't added
> your name
Fuck you guys!!!
On 5/9/07, Yegor Kozlov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
Yegor
> Sadly a bit too late to make the next board meeting I suspect.
> However, here's a vote for Commons to officially request that it move to
TLP.
> http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/TLPResolution
> Please a
20 matches
Mail list logo