On 15.10.09 00:49, Henri Yandell wrote:
Slightly less tongue in cheek - maybe now is the time to move ORO,
Regexp and ECS over to Commons.
I thought, Attic was the correct place, at least for ECS?
Bye, Thomas.
-
To unsubscrib
Quick recap so far is that there have been a variety of views
expressed on the topic of one dev@ (and commits@/notifications@), and
it seems there is some positive interest in moving ahead. Therefore,
as noted towards the end of the email below, I'll be moving to the
next step of calling a vote on
Daniel F. Savarese wrote:
In my opinion, JMeter should really go top-level, but the community
has not yet (and may never) come to that conclusion.
JMeter used to be just at the brink of being viable as
a TLP. Mailing list traffic is stable and high, but the
number of active developers was very
Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Daniel F. Savarese
>> wrote:
>>>
>>
>>>
>>> Although I think we need to discuss and resolve what the future of
>>> Jakarta is to be, I agree with Rahul that it should be a separate
>
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Slightly less tongue in cheek - maybe now is the time to move ORO,
> Regexp and ECS over to Commons.
>
> I'm happy to help out with the move if desired. If active projects
> then moving to a new site style and JIRA would come up, but given th
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Daniel F. Savarese
> wrote:
>>
>
>>
>> Although I think we need to discuss and resolve what the future of
>> Jakarta is to be, I agree with Rahul that it should be a separate
>> discussion after resolving h
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Daniel F. Savarese wrote:
>
>
> Although I think we need to discuss and resolve what the future of
> Jakarta is to be, I agree with Rahul that it should be a separate
> discussion after resolving his more narrowly scoped dev@/commits@
> proposal. The only reason
In message <4ad4c6e2.2090...@dubioso.net>, Roland Weber writes:
>Have you noticed how much traffic there is on jmeter-user?
>It will easily drown all other communication on a combined
>user list. Subscribers to any other Jakarta user list will
>*not* be amused about getting all that into their inb
Daniel F. Savarese wrote:
general@ as user@ to contain user traffic for all Jakarta projects,
retiring all the -user lists in the process. People can specify the
specific project referred to in the subject a la Commons
That may work for Commons, because it is the established
procedure there. I
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/attic-general/200902.mbox/%3ca3af8739-d168-44b6-8544-201f8d5b5...@dslextreme.com%3e
On 13/10/2009, at 6:18 AM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Brett Porter
wrote:
A related side note - some time back I think there was a request to
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> A related side note - some time back I think there was a request to shut
> down the slide user and dev lists, but that slipped off the radar. Is that
> desired now?
>
ISTR some discussion but its been a while. Before I go digging in the
arch
A related side note - some time back I think there was a request to
shut down the slide user and dev lists, but that slipped off the
radar. Is that desired now?
On 10/10/2009, at 8:43 AM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
[Out of necessity, this is heavily cross-posted. Suggestion is to send
any replies
On 11/10/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
> >> Care to elaborate a bit?
> >
> > I'd argue that for the people who care it's no big deal to subscribe
> > to the various lists. So tuning in is no problem, tuning out once
> > consolidated indeed
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
>> Care to elaborate a bit?
>
> I'd argue that for the people who care it's no big deal to subscribe
> to the various lists. So tuning in is no problem, tuning out once
> consolidated indeed is. It's an all-or-nothing. How is oversight
> better
> Care to elaborate a bit?
I'd argue that for the people who care it's no big deal to subscribe
to the various lists. So tuning in is no problem, tuning out once
consolidated indeed is. It's an all-or-nothing. How is oversight
better when everyone (or at least all PMC members) are subscribed to
al
ache.org; jcs-
> d...@jakarta.apache.org; jmeter-...@jakarta.apache.org; oro-
> d...@jakarta.apache.org; regexp-...@jakarta.apache.org; slide-
> d...@jakarta.apache.org; Jakarta Project Management Committee List
> Subject: [PROPOSAL] One development list
>
> [Out of necessity, this is heavily
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 4:12 AM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
>>> >>We currently have 8 active development lists at Jakarta, each devoted
>>> >>to a subproject. I've been subscribed to all for a while and based on
>>> >>my observations and the overall benefits of doing so, I think its time
>>> >>to co
>> >>We currently have 8 active development lists at Jakarta, each devoted
>> >>to a subproject. I've been subscribed to all for a while and based on
>> >>my observations and the overall benefits of doing so, I think its time
>> >>to consolidate them into a single development list at Jakarta.
>
On 10/10/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Daniel F. Savarese wrote:
> >
> > In message ,
> Rahul
> > Akolkar writes:
> >>We currently have 8 active development lists at Jakarta, each devoted
> >>to a subproject. I've been subscribed to all for a while and based
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Daniel F. Savarese wrote:
>
> In message ,
> Rahul
> Akolkar writes:
>>We currently have 8 active development lists at Jakarta, each devoted
>>to a subproject. I've been subscribed to all for a while and based on
>>my observations and the overall benefits of doing
In message , Rahul
Akolkar writes:
>We currently have 8 active development lists at Jakarta, each devoted
>to a subproject. I've been subscribed to all for a while and based on
>my observations and the overall benefits of doing so, I think its time
>to consolidate them into a single development l
[Out of necessity, this is heavily cross-posted. Suggestion is to send
any replies to the gene...@jakarta list only to keep any discussion in
one place.]
We currently have 8 active development lists at Jakarta, each devoted
to a subproject. I've been subscribed to all for a while and based on
my o
22 matches
Mail list logo
