FYI..
I am in stress mode currently.. Wednesday I will arrive in Austin though and will catch up with all
Apache related stuff.
Mvgr,
Martin
Nathan Bubna wrote:
Ok, Geir's +1/-1 has been resolved to just a +1. So the vote now stand as:
+1 votes:
Nathan Bubna
Martin van den Bemt
James Mi
Ok, Geir's +1/-1 has been resolved to just a +1. So the vote now stand as:
+1 votes:
Nathan Bubna
Martin van den Bemt
James Mitchell
Henri Yandell
Jorg Schaible
Henning P. Schmiedehausen
Will Glass-Husain
Torsten Curdt
Rony G. Flatscher
Jesse Kuhnert
Dion Gillard
Daniel Rall
Matthij
On 9/26/06, Henning Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Folks,
with the voting over and the discussion about the finer print of the
Charter dying down, how does this now continue? As I can see, this must
now become an official request to the board which then must be
approved.
Who sends
On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 21:02 +0200, I scribbled:
> When is the next board meeting scheduled, BTW?
I can actually answer that myself. We missed the Sep 20th board meeting,
so the next will be Wed, Oct 18th, the week after AC US.
Best regards
Henning
--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.
Hi Folks,
with the voting over and the discussion about the finer print of the
Charter dying down, how does this now continue? As I can see, this must
now become an official request to the board which then must be
approved.
Who sends this to the board? Martin (As Jakarta is the current TLP of
Ve
On 9/24/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nathan Bubna wrote:
> On 9/23/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Nathan Bubna wrote:
>> > On 9/22/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> >> I'm +1 and -1.
>> >>
>> >> I'm +1 as I do think that Velocity as a
Nathan Bubna wrote:
> On 9/23/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Nathan Bubna wrote:
>> > On 9/22/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> >> I'm +1 and -1.
>> >>
>> >> I'm +1 as I do think that Velocity as a TLP is not unreasonable. Not
>> >> necessary, but not un
On 9/23/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nathan Bubna wrote:
> On 9/22/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm +1 and -1.
>>
>> I'm +1 as I do think that Velocity as a TLP is not unreasonable. Not
>> necessary, but not unreasonable.
>>
>> I'm -1 because I'm wor
Subject: Re: [RESULT] Move Velocity to TLP
To: Velocity Developers List , [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Wow. Skip email for a day and there's a blizzard. I take Geir's
comments pretty seriously though.
To me, the most important part of this is the opportunity to grow the
developer community. T
Adding velocity-dev
Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm completely with Nathan here. A Velocity TLP will not be "another
> Jakarta" (though I do fail to see why everyone seems to believe that
> Jakata is always considered a bad example).
Right - the only thing that was bad about Jakarta
Nathan Bubna wrote:
> On 9/22/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This vote closed sooner than expected. I was traveling and there was no
>> stated deadline.
>
> Aw, c'mon. It's been in discussion on velocity-dev for over a month,
> and i gave the vote a full week!
Not complai
On 9/23/06, Henning Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm completely with Nathan here. A Velocity TLP will not be "another
Jakarta" (though I do fail to see why everyone seems to believe that
Jakata is always considered a bad example).
On the opposite. The Velocity TLP is intended
Hi,
I'm completely with Nathan here. A Velocity TLP will not be "another
Jakarta" (though I do fail to see why everyone seems to believe that
Jakata is always considered a bad example).
On the opposite. The Velocity TLP is intended to help reducing the
number of projects that Jakarta has. Which
On 9/22/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This vote closed sooner than expected. I was traveling and there was no
stated deadline.
Aw, c'mon. It's been in discussion on velocity-dev for over a month,
and i gave the vote a full week!
Still, further votes and discussion are fine
This vote closed sooner than expected. I was traveling and there was no
stated deadline.
I'm +1 and -1.
I'm +1 as I do think that Velocity as a TLP is not unreasonable. Not
necessary, but not unreasonable.
I'm -1 because I'm worried that this is a new kind of umbrella that's
planned. Making it
Looks like the Velocity community is ready to head out on its own...
+1 votes:
Nathan Bubna
Martin van den Bemt
James Mitchell
Henri Yandell
Jorg Schaible
Henning P. Schmiedehausen
Will Glass-Husain
Torsten Curdt
Rony G. Flatscher
Jesse Kuhnert
Dion Gillard
Daniel Rall
Matthijs Lambo
16 matches
Mail list logo