Re: [RESULT] Move Velocity to TLP

2006-10-02 Thread Martin van den Bemt
FYI.. I am in stress mode currently.. Wednesday I will arrive in Austin though and will catch up with all Apache related stuff. Mvgr, Martin Nathan Bubna wrote: Ok, Geir's +1/-1 has been resolved to just a +1. So the vote now stand as: +1 votes: Nathan Bubna Martin van den Bemt James Mi

[RESULT] Move Velocity to TLP

2006-09-29 Thread Nathan Bubna
Ok, Geir's +1/-1 has been resolved to just a +1. So the vote now stand as: +1 votes: Nathan Bubna Martin van den Bemt James Mitchell Henri Yandell Jorg Schaible Henning P. Schmiedehausen Will Glass-Husain Torsten Curdt Rony G. Flatscher Jesse Kuhnert Dion Gillard Daniel Rall Matthij

Re: [RESULT] Move Velocity to TLP

2006-09-26 Thread Henri Yandell
On 9/26/06, Henning Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Folks, with the voting over and the discussion about the finer print of the Charter dying down, how does this now continue? As I can see, this must now become an official request to the board which then must be approved. Who sends

Re: [RESULT] Move Velocity to TLP

2006-09-26 Thread Henning Schmiedehausen
On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 21:02 +0200, I scribbled: > When is the next board meeting scheduled, BTW? I can actually answer that myself. We missed the Sep 20th board meeting, so the next will be Wed, Oct 18th, the week after AC US. Best regards Henning -- Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.

Re: [RESULT] Move Velocity to TLP

2006-09-26 Thread Henning Schmiedehausen
Hi Folks, with the voting over and the discussion about the finer print of the Charter dying down, how does this now continue? As I can see, this must now become an official request to the board which then must be approved. Who sends this to the board? Martin (As Jakarta is the current TLP of Ve

Re: [RESULT] Move Velocity to TLP

2006-09-24 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 9/24/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nathan Bubna wrote: > On 9/23/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Nathan Bubna wrote: >> > On 9/22/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> I'm +1 and -1. >> >> >> >> I'm +1 as I do think that Velocity as a

Re: [RESULT] Move Velocity to TLP

2006-09-24 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
Nathan Bubna wrote: > On 9/23/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Nathan Bubna wrote: >> > On 9/22/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> I'm +1 and -1. >> >> >> >> I'm +1 as I do think that Velocity as a TLP is not unreasonable. Not >> >> necessary, but not un

[RESULT] Move Velocity to TLP

2006-09-24 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 9/23/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nathan Bubna wrote: > On 9/22/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'm +1 and -1. >> >> I'm +1 as I do think that Velocity as a TLP is not unreasonable. Not >> necessary, but not unreasonable. >> >> I'm -1 because I'm wor

Fwd: [RESULT] Move Velocity to TLP

2006-09-23 Thread Will Glass-Husain
Subject: Re: [RESULT] Move Velocity to TLP To: Velocity Developers List , [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wow. Skip email for a day and there's a blizzard. I take Geir's comments pretty seriously though. To me, the most important part of this is the opportunity to grow the developer community. T

Re: [RESULT] Move Velocity to TLP

2006-09-23 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
Adding velocity-dev Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: > Hi, > > I'm completely with Nathan here. A Velocity TLP will not be "another > Jakarta" (though I do fail to see why everyone seems to believe that > Jakata is always considered a bad example). Right - the only thing that was bad about Jakarta

Re: [RESULT] Move Velocity to TLP

2006-09-23 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
Nathan Bubna wrote: > On 9/22/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> This vote closed sooner than expected. I was traveling and there was no >> stated deadline. > > Aw, c'mon. It's been in discussion on velocity-dev for over a month, > and i gave the vote a full week! Not complai

Re: [RESULT] Move Velocity to TLP

2006-09-23 Thread Martin Cooper
On 9/23/06, Henning Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I'm completely with Nathan here. A Velocity TLP will not be "another Jakarta" (though I do fail to see why everyone seems to believe that Jakata is always considered a bad example). On the opposite. The Velocity TLP is intended

Re: [RESULT] Move Velocity to TLP

2006-09-23 Thread Henning Schmiedehausen
Hi, I'm completely with Nathan here. A Velocity TLP will not be "another Jakarta" (though I do fail to see why everyone seems to believe that Jakata is always considered a bad example). On the opposite. The Velocity TLP is intended to help reducing the number of projects that Jakarta has. Which

Re: [RESULT] Move Velocity to TLP

2006-09-22 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 9/22/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This vote closed sooner than expected. I was traveling and there was no stated deadline. Aw, c'mon. It's been in discussion on velocity-dev for over a month, and i gave the vote a full week! Still, further votes and discussion are fine

Re: [RESULT] Move Velocity to TLP

2006-09-22 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
This vote closed sooner than expected. I was traveling and there was no stated deadline. I'm +1 and -1. I'm +1 as I do think that Velocity as a TLP is not unreasonable. Not necessary, but not unreasonable. I'm -1 because I'm worried that this is a new kind of umbrella that's planned. Making it

[RESULT] Move Velocity to TLP

2006-09-22 Thread Nathan Bubna
Looks like the Velocity community is ready to head out on its own... +1 votes: Nathan Bubna Martin van den Bemt James Mitchell Henri Yandell Jorg Schaible Henning P. Schmiedehausen Will Glass-Husain Torsten Curdt Rony G. Flatscher Jesse Kuhnert Dion Gillard Daniel Rall Matthijs Lambo