A number of gump changes that some might want to be aware of:
1) Due to space concerns, gump's output is moving from
daedalus.apache.org to icarus.apache.org. This includes build logs, cvs
extract snapshots, and nightly builds. If you have any urls which
reference one of these, simply c
on 2002/11/10 9:06 AM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 3) I plan to move Gump out of Alexandria. My favorite suggestion to
> date is from Costin: move Gump to jakarta-commons. If you care to
> comment on this, please direct your replies to alexandria-dev.
>
> - Sam Ruby
Personally, I t
Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
on 2002/11/10 9:06 AM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
3) I plan to move Gump out of Alexandria. My favorite suggestion to
date is from Costin: move Gump to jakarta-commons. If you care to
comment on this, please direct your replies to alexandria-dev.
- Sam R
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
on 2002/11/10 9:06 AM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
3) I plan to move Gump out of Alexandria. My favorite suggestion to
date is from Costin: move Gump to jakarta-commons. If you care to
comment on this, please direct your replies
on 2002/11/10 8:25 PM, "Stephen McConnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the size of the development community supporting gump ?
1.3
Sam might be short, but he has .3 of someone else's personality!
=)
-jon
--
StudioZ.tv /\ Bar/Nightclub/Entertainment
314 11th Street @ Folsom /\ San Fr
On 10/11/02 5:06 pm, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A number of gump changes that some might want to be aware of:
>
> 1) Due to space concerns, gump's output is moving from
> daedalus.apache.org to icarus.apache.org. This includes build logs, cvs
> e
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Pier Fumagalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Huh? Why not leaving it on Nagoya?
I don't think the "nightly" build is created on Nagoya, but on Sam's
private machine.
> Hmm... Do I need to install 1.4.1 (latest) on Nago, then?
I think so.
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Stephen McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the size of the development community supporting gump ?
Four or five people have made commits to the Gump part of Alexandria
during the past three months. But most haven't touched Gump's code
but merely updated the proje
"Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Pier Fumagalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Huh? Why not leaving it on Nagoya?
>
> I don't think the "nightly" build is created on Nagoya, but on Sam's
> private machine.
So I'm wondering why the heck I'm running that thing 4
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Pier Fumagalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I'm wondering why the heck I'm running that thing 4 times a day,
> if at the end, no one uses it...
Gump runs a couple of times a day on a couple of machines (this
includes running on nagoya). Those are linked from Gump's websit
Pier Fumagalli wrote
So I'm wondering why the heck I'm running that thing 4 times a day,
if at the end, no one uses it...
It should only be run on Nagoya twice a day. As a general rule, builds
have the most success on a Linux/intel machine, so that's the one that I
call the "official" one.
The Gump setup can be leveraged as a testing lab. I found the fact
that gump runs on machines in different timezones (at least in a
different timezone than mine) very valuable. This small difference has
allowed us to catch a timezone dependent bug which we might
not have caught otherwise.
Runs o
12 matches
Mail list logo
