> The latest committer Jung Yan does not (yet) appear.
His CLA was recorded this morning, along with several others.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El miércoles, 10 dici, 2003, a las 09:37 Europe/Madrid, David Sean
Taylor escribió:
I agree with David's evaluation of Jetspeed situation.
Yesterday I was looking at the committer list of (jakarta-) jetspeed,
jetspeed-2 and pluto, and I found:
Proj
> Just a reminder, but there need not be a 1:1 mapping of PMC and web
domain,
> so there is no need to breakup the Jakarta web site unless people *want*
to
> do so.
Quite so, there's no obligation on a promoted sub-project to abandon its
place in the jakarta infrastructure.
In fact the idea of
David Sean Taylor wrote,
> Just for fun I thought I'd fill this out for the Jetspeed and Pluto
> projects (WSRP4J is another possibility).
> We would like to start a TLP named 'portal.apache.org' including
> Jetspeed-1, Jetspeed-2 and Pluto, and other portal apps as they are
> developed.
Good
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 23:00, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> The question is whether some projects are willing to make the step to TLP.
> These seem like possible candidates:
> Tomcat, Lucene, Struts, Velocity
Turbine.
SCNR
Henning
--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiede
On Tuesday, December 9, 2003, at 07:13 AM, Danny Angus wrote:
Just for fun I thought I'd fill this out for the Jetspeed and Pluto
projects (WSRP4J is another possibility).
We would like to start a TLP named 'portal.apache.org' including
Jetspeed-1, Jetspeed-2 and Pluto, and other portal apps as
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> The list of TLP sugestions outlined below is a good starting point.
> The question is whether some projects are willing to make the step to TLP.
Just a reminder, but there need not be a 1:1 mapping of PMC and web domain,
so there is no need to breakup the Jakarta web
The list of TLP sugestions outlined below is a good starting point. I'll
suggest some applicability:
The question is whether some projects are willing to make the step to TLP.
These seem like possible candidates:
Tomcat, Lucene, Struts, Velocity
Some others don't strike me as moving out:
BCEL, BS
In the light of a request to the PMC by a Jakarta sub-project to have its
own "top-level" wiki I thought of this...
Jakarta is attempting to put our house in order wrt oversight, this is
manifesting itself as incresed centralisation of oversight, and reduced
autonomy for sub-projects.
An issu
