Re: CVS->SVN Was: SVN of ECS

2004-09-30 Thread Henri Yandell
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Martin Cooper wrote: On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:32:06 -0400 (EDT), Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: but that may not fit every subproject. I have a definite Commons view of the world where every component is equal. I'm not sure how commons-sandbox should be handled though.

Re: CVS->SVN Was: SVN of ECS

2004-09-28 Thread Martin Cooper
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:32:06 -0400 (EDT), Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > ok. So this means, once we get e.g. /jakarta/turbine, we could > > set the repository structure below it just as we see it fit? > > > > We

RE: CVS->SVN Was: SVN of ECS

2004-09-28 Thread Henri Yandell
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: Hi, ok. So this means, once we get e.g. /jakarta/turbine, we could set the repository structure below it just as we see it fit? We (Turbine) currently have (for history reasons) a lot of CVS repositories and consolidating them is a real pet peeve

Re: CVS->SVN Was: SVN of ECS

2004-09-28 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Henri Yandell wrote: My suggestion would be: jakarta/tomcat/tomcat-5 jakarta/tomcat/connectors jakarta/tomcat/servletapi ie) we'd delineate on definite subproject lines, rather than having projects with multiple directories in the jakarta-root. I'm not against servletapi (or any) being their own

RE: CVS->SVN Was: SVN of ECS

2004-09-28 Thread Henri Yandell
September 28, 2004 4:18 AM To: Jakarta General List Subject: RE: CVS->SVN Was: SVN of ECS Hi, ok. So this means, once we get e.g. /jakarta/turbine, we could set the repository structure below it just as we see it fit? We (Turbine) currently have (for history reasons) a lot of CVS repositories and

RE: CVS->SVN Was: SVN of ECS

2004-09-28 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Millennium Research Informatics >-Original Message- >From: Henning Schmiedehausen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 4:18 AM >To: Jakarta General List >Subject: RE: CVS->SVN Was: SVN of ECS > >Hi, > >ok. So this means, once we get e.g. /jakar

RE: CVS->SVN Was: SVN of ECS

2004-09-28 Thread Henning Schmiedehausen
Hi, ok. So this means, once we get e.g. /jakarta/turbine, we could set the repository structure below it just as we see it fit? We (Turbine) currently have (for history reasons) a lot of CVS repositories and consolidating them is a real pet peeve for me. ;-) Regards Henni

Re: CVS->SVN Was: SVN of ECS

2004-09-26 Thread Daniel F. Savarese
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Henri Yandell writes: >2 >- >Going with the example of trunk/tags/branches/site, I'd like to suggest >using releases/ rather than tags/. It seems closer to what we mean. Tags >does seem more common though, so just a suggestion. ... >- > >jakarta/ > tomcat/ >

Re: CVS->SVN Was: SVN of ECS

2004-09-25 Thread Henri Yandell
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Martin Cooper wrote: There is this to start with: http://www.apache.org/dev/cvs2svn.html Cool, just what I was hoping for. Seems that the only major thing we have to do is plan step 2: "Decide how you want your repository converted. Read the cvs2svn manual for the different wa

Re: CVS->SVN Was: SVN of ECS

2004-09-25 Thread Martin Cooper
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 21:25:37 +0100, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 24 Sep 2004, at 19:55, Henri Yandell wrote: > > > Sounds good to me. ORO's the first to goto SVN then. > > cool > > > Noel (or any other local to Jakarta infra people), before I go ahead > > and just make a

Re: CVS->SVN Was: SVN of ECS

2004-09-25 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 24 Sep 2004, at 19:55, Henri Yandell wrote: Sounds good to me. ORO's the first to goto SVN then. cool Noel (or any other local to Jakarta infra people), before I go ahead and just make a request, is there a particular process you'd like us to adhere to? given jakarta's large and diverse, i'd s