Proposing this as a challenge vote (i.e. if no one has a good -1
against something moving to the attic, it's a sign it should go to the
attic).
[ ] +1, G'night BSF
[ ] -1, No because:
Per Sebb's statement:
Now that JSR-223 is part of Java 1.6 there is less need for BSF.
There are no bugs
On 23.07.2011 20:47, sebb wrote:
* BSF: Slow activity; only coder in last two years is Sebb.
A difficult one to decide on. I think we should challenge on it going
to the Attic, and if not send it to Commons where it will have more
chance of activity.
Now that JSR-223 is part of Java
[X] -1, No because:
there are outstanding bugs that should be fixed and I would do that, but need
some time (land-under-water currently).
---rony
On 24.07.2011 08:27, Henri Yandell wrote:
Proposing this as a challenge vote (i.e. if no one has a good -1
against something moving to the
[x] +1, G'night Cactus
On 23.07.2011 20:25, Henri Yandell wrote:
Proposing this as a challenge vote (i.e. if no one has a good -1
against something moving to the attic, it's a sign it should go to the
attic).
[ ] +1, G'night Cactus
[ ] -1, No because:
There's no activity in the project
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Rony G. Flatscher
rony.flatsc...@wu-wien.ac.at wrote:
On 23.07.2011 20:47, sebb wrote:
* BSF: Slow activity; only coder in last two years is Sebb.
A difficult one to decide on. I think we should challenge on it going
to the Attic, and if not send it to
Forwarding below to dev@ and private@ for increased awareness. Replies
to original thread on general@ please.
-Rahul
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Henri Yandell he...@yandell.org wrote:
Thought I'd summarize the current activity of the subprojects:
* Cactus: No code commits since
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Henri Yandell
bay...@generationjava.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Rony G. Flatscher
rony.flatsc...@wu-wien.ac.at wrote:
On 23.07.2011 20:47, sebb wrote:
* BSF: Slow activity; only coder in last two years is Sebb.
A difficult one to decide on. I
