Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP

2007-05-10 Thread Jean Carlo Salas
Fuck you guys!!! On 5/9/07, Yegor Kozlov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 Yegor Sadly a bit too late to make the next board meeting I suspect. However, here's a vote for Commons to officially request that it move to TLP. http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/TLPResolution Please add

Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP

2007-05-10 Thread luc . maisonobe
However, here's a vote for Commons to officially request that it move to TLP. +1 (non binding) http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/TLPResolution Please add your name if you're a Commons developer and haven't added your name yet. I think you have already explained that yesterday,

Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP

2007-05-10 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! [X ] +1 I support the proposal [ ] +0 I don't care [ ] -1 I'm opposed to the proposal because... Ciao, Mario - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP

2007-05-10 Thread Henri Yandell
On 5/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However, here's a vote for Commons to officially request that it move to TLP. +1 (non binding) http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/TLPResolution Please add your name if you're a Commons developer and haven't added your name

Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP

2007-05-10 Thread luc . maisonobe
Selon Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED]: At this time it tends to be common for the new PMC to be formed of the committers. It can depend, if someone is a new committer then it'll be weird adding them to the PMC from the get go (least that seems to be the general opinion). I realized today

Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP

2007-05-10 Thread Ted Husted
Then why not just strike the word Java from the resolution now? -Ted. On 5/9/07, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I think this was discussed before and the consensus was we will change the charter if a C# project actually shows up. Jakarta is dying because there is not

Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP

2007-05-10 Thread Ted Husted
On 5/8/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ ] +1 I support the proposal [ ] +0 I don't care [x] -1 I'm opposed to the proposal because... I do not feel the draft resolution adequately addresses several remarks made in the discussion thread. The resolution should address issues raised

Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP

2007-05-10 Thread Niall Pemberton
On 5/10/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However, here's a vote for Commons to officially request that it move to TLP. +1 (non binding) http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/TLPResolution Please add your name if

Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP

2007-05-10 Thread Niall Pemberton
On 5/10/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/8/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ ] +1 I support the proposal [ ] +0 I don't care [x] -1 I'm opposed to the proposal because... I do not feel the draft resolution adequately addresses several remarks made in the discussion

Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP

2007-05-10 Thread Henri Yandell
On 5/10/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/8/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ ] +1 I support the proposal [ ] +0 I don't care [x] -1 I'm opposed to the proposal because... I do not feel the draft resolution adequately addresses several remarks made in the discussion

Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP

2007-05-10 Thread Jean Carlo Salas
did you why Apache Tomcat dosn't run in Vista?? On 5/10/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/10/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/8/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ ] +1 I support the proposal [ ] +0 I don't care [x] -1 I'm opposed to the proposal

OT - Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP

2007-05-10 Thread David Fisher
Sorry. No. Not on this list. (1) Go to http://tomcat.apache.com look for their email list and ask your question on that list. (2) Please learn to be much more polite, as you have been very rude in your earlier replies. (3) Questions belong in a new email message and not in a reply.