Friday, 3. August 2012 schrieb Achim Nierbeck:
> > Hi,
>
> hello all,
>
> > comments inline :)
> >
> > regards, Achim
> >
> > 2012/8/3 Harald Wellmann :
> > > UML diagrams certainly would be nice, but I'm a bit wary about
> > &
Am Friday, 3. August 2012 schrieb Achim Nierbeck:
> Hi,
hello all,
> comments inline :)
>
> regards, Achim
>
> 2012/8/3 Harald Wellmann :
> > UML diagrams certainly would be nice, but I'm a bit wary about
> > creating yet another tool dependency.
>
Hi,
comments inline :)
regards, Achim
2012/8/3 Harald Wellmann :
> UML diagrams certainly would be nice, but I'm a bit wary about
> creating yet another tool dependency.
>
> I gather that all the tools you mentioned are commercial. Even if we
> got a free license for the U
UML diagrams certainly would be nice, but I'm a bit wary about
creating yet another tool dependency.
I gather that all the tools you mentioned are commercial. Even if we
got a free license for the UML tool, there would still be the issue of
integrating the tool into JIRA and/or Confluence.
) Pax Exam to work on some issues I have come across. While working
>> myself into the architecture (especially of the latter), I find myself
>> thinking that it would be useful to have UML-Diagrams describing the
>> architecture. Since there are none, I thought about cre
I am currently working myself into Pax Tinybundles and (the much more
complex) Pax Exam to work on some issues I have come across. While working
myself into the architecture (especially of the latter), I find myself
thinking that it would be useful to have UML-Diagrams describing the
architecture
