Oops, the discussion was not directly related to what I was
talking about. My apologies.. (should always read the thread
first and not answer to a random mail). And sorry for the
typos..
/Jarkko
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 12:09:30PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 12:32:37PM
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 12:32:37PM +0900, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Arjan van de Ven
> wrote:
> > On 10/5/2012 9:27 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> >> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 1:18 AM, Arjan van de Ven
> >> wrote:
> >>> On 10/5/2012 9:11 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Arjan van de Ven
> wrote:
>> On 10/5/2012 9:27 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 1:18 AM, Arjan van de Ven
>>> wrote:
On 10/5/2012 9:11 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> As f
I think there are mismatches in a few packages especially for tools
which are not included in the Tizen platform itself. We are trying to
figure out how many unexpected changes we have in the repositories and
that is why all previous works are safely preserved in 1.0_post
branch. Sorry for any inco
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On 10/5/2012 9:27 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 1:18 AM, Arjan van de Ven
>> wrote:
>>> On 10/5/2012 9:11 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
As far as I know, Kibum Kim is away and he is just a SCM guy.
>>>
>>> SCM
Oh right. thanks.
This is exactly what I wanted to mention :)
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Nashif, Anas wrote:
>
>
> On 05/10/2012 12:32, "Arjan van de Ven" wrote:
>
>>On 10/5/2012 9:27 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 1:18 AM, Arjan van de Ven
On 05/10/2012 12:32, "Arjan van de Ven" wrote:
>On 10/5/2012 9:27 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 1:18 AM, Arjan van de Ven
>> wrote:
>>> On 10/5/2012 9:11 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
As far as I know, Kibum Kim is away and he is just a SCM guy.
>>>
>>> SCM guy ?
>>
On 10/5/2012 9:27 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 1:18 AM, Arjan van de Ven
> wrote:
>> On 10/5/2012 9:11 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
>>> As far as I know, Kibum Kim is away and he is just a SCM guy.
>>
>> SCM guy ?
>
> Yes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source_Control_Mana
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 1:18 AM, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On 10/5/2012 9:11 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
>> As far as I know, Kibum Kim is away and he is just a SCM guy.
>
> SCM guy ?
Yes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source_Control_Management
He just dumped Tizen source code from Samsung interna
On 10/5/2012 9:11 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> As far as I know, Kibum Kim is away and he is just a SCM guy.
SCM guy ?
> At that time, Tizen didn't keep the internal git histories which is a bad
> idea.
at that time? This is in August!
And yes, Tizen HAD a git already at that time this wa
As far as I know, Kibum Kim is away and he is just a SCM guy.
At that time, Tizen didn't keep the internal git histories which is a bad idea.
So I recommend you to check debian/control or debian/changelog files.
I am not going to mention the maintainer's name here though.
https://review.tizen.org/
On 10/4/2012 10:56 AM, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in the following commit, from August 23rd, you seem to be replacing the very
> nice, modern and lightweight
> "bootchart" tool that is written by Auke in C, with a really old (2005!)
> version written in Java (!!)
> https://review.tizen.or
Hi,
in the following commit, from August 23rd, you seem to be replacing the very
nice, modern and lightweight
"bootchart" tool that is written by Auke in C, with a really old (2005!)
version written in Java (!!)
https://review.tizen.org/git/?p=external/bootchart.git;a=commitdiff;h=30267f1d1bd183
13 matches
Mail list logo
