Re: WS-Addressing Implementation

2004-02-12 Thread Steve Loughran
Anne Thomas Manes wrote: Perhaps it is a break from REST, but it isn't a break from the core SOAP architecture -- which as a message packaging protocol is designed to be completely independent from the underlying transport. (and we all should admit that SOAP uses HTTP as a transport, not as a tr

Re: WS-Addressing Implementation

2004-02-12 Thread Steve Loughran
David A. Chappell wrote: -Original Message- From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 9:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: WS-Addressing Implementation ... Actually, if you are going to do any of them, ws-eventing is a lot, lot simpler. ws

Re: WS-Addressing Implementation

2004-02-12 Thread Anne Thomas Manes
Perhaps it is a break from REST, but it isn't a break from the core SOAP architecture -- which as a message packaging protocol is designed to be completely independent from the underlying transport. (and we all should admit that SOAP uses HTTP as a transport, not as a transfer protocol) The SOA

RE: WS-Addressing Implementation

2004-02-12 Thread David A. Chappell
> -Original Message- > From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 9:07 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: WS-Addressing Implementation ... > Actually, if you are going to do any of them, ws-eventing is > a lot, lot sim

Re: WS-Addressing Implementation

2004-02-12 Thread Steve Loughran
Davanum Srinivas wrote: We all have our pet peeve's and skeletons we'd like to bury :) Well, I think that ws-* is aggressively diverging from REST, and despite attempts by SOAP1.2 to bring the two architectures together, it aint happening. Do you want to work on WS-Resource* on ws-fx as well? I

Re: WS-Addressing Implementation

2004-02-12 Thread Davanum Srinivas
We all have our pet peeve's and skeletons we'd like to bury :) Do you want to work on WS-Resource* on ws-fx as well? I was thinking of taking a stab at either WS-Eventing or WS-Notification soon. thanks, dims --- Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ias wrote: > >>FYI, http://ws.apache.o

Re: WS-Addressing Implementation

2004-02-12 Thread Steve Loughran
Ias wrote: FYI, http://ws.apache.org/ws-fx/addressing/ Thanks very much for your nice work! Hoping Apache Addressing's thriving future with interest and participation from people everywhere, While I am glad that we are keeping up with the WS-* standards, I am unsure about the whole sub-addressing

RE: WS-Addressing Implementation

2004-02-11 Thread Ias
> FYI, http://ws.apache.org/ws-fx/addressing/ Thanks very much for your nice work! Hoping Apache Addressing's thriving future with interest and participation from people everywhere, Ias > > -- dims > > = > Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/ >