> Do I need a full 32-bit chroot to compile a 32-bit guest? Or can I just
> pass a SUBARCH=x86 (or something like that) to compile it?
SUBARCH does not work (at least not for me)
I have cross posted to uml-user ML, in case anyone has a better way of
compiling x86 guests on a x86-64 host.
Antoine
UML currently does not support 64bit guests.
You can use a 32bit guest however.
Antoine
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 10:29 -0500, Gregory Symons wrote:
> Hey!
>
> Has anyone managed to get User Mode Linux up and running? I'm running
> linux-2.6.11-gentoo-r2 sources and am having some problems getting t
On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 19:18 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Antoine Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Bearing in mind that I have not been confronted to any of these issues,
> > I can't think of a reason why a piece of software should rely on
> > hard-coded
On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 00:26 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I have what I consider the best evidence yet that lib being the 32-bit
> > area is better.
>
> [...]
>
> So the debate is between practical considerations such as you describe, on
> the one hand, and the plai
Hi List,
I've got a chroot environment (which can also be used inside a UML
session with the same results), when I try to upgrade openssl it tries
to compile it in 64-bit mode, but this is a 32-bit chroot (even running
with a 32-bit kernel under UML).
How can I force it to compile in 32-bit mode?
On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 19:44 -0800, Joby Walker wrote:
> I have successfully been using a MSI K8N Neo Platinum for a fileserver
> for about four months now. And with my 2 Seagate 200GB hard drives
> filling up I decided to get 2 Seagate 400GB SATA drives to add capacity,
> but I have run into an
> Maybe it's a Problem with the calibration of the built in temperature sensor
> of the amd64. I don't even know if that sensor could or must be calibrated.
Spot on. Tyan does provide good sensors.conf for their boards, whereas
MSI never even acknowledged that Linux even exists.
Go Tyan!
--
g
