Antoine Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 19:18 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > Antoine Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Bearing in mind that I have not been confronted to any of these issues,
> > > I can't think of a reason why a piece of software should rely o
Hi,
> lib = 32, lib64 = 64 is better
This is our final goal for 2005.1 IIRC. To catch programs that put their
64bit-libraries into lib, you can stick multilib-strict in your
FEATURES, but don't expect your system working for now. I already
created a little template to report multilib-strict bugs
On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 19:18 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Antoine Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Bearing in mind that I have not been confronted to any of these issues,
> > I can't think of a reason why a piece of software should rely on
> > hard-coded paths.
>
> By hard-coded do you me
Antoine Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bearing in mind that I have not been confronted to any of these issues,
> I can't think of a reason why a piece of software should rely on
> hard-coded paths.
By hard-coded do you mean to exclude software that sets paths at
compile time, or do you mean r
On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 00:26 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I have what I consider the best evidence yet that lib being the 32-bit
> > area is better.
>
> [...]
>
> So the debate is between practical considerations such as you describe, on
> the one hand, and the plai
Peter Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So the debate is between practical considerations such as you describe, on
> the one hand, and the plain logical conclusion that, on the amd64
> platform, /lib is the natural place for 64-bit libraries, the 32-bit ones
> being of the nature of a kludge
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have what I consider the best evidence yet that lib being the 32-bit
> area is better.
[...]
So the debate is between practical considerations such as you describe, on
the one hand, and the plain logical conclusion that, on the amd64
platform, /lib is the natural pl
I have what I consider the best evidence yet that lib being the 32-bit
area is better.
I just finished adding Imlib2 support to a 32-bit program, working in
my chroot. I am used to running this program in my 64-bit
environment, but the Imlib2 support didn't work there.
Imlib2 uses plug-ins for