Re: [gentoo-amd64] unsubscribe

2005-09-20 Thread Jonathan Schaeffer
Hey Felix, won't you post again your howto unsubscribe ? 2005/9/20, Brandon M. Heimbigner [EMAIL PROTECTED]: unsubscribe -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-amd64] Re: kernel.org vs. Gentoo-64 bit kernels (xruns)

2005-09-20 Thread Duncan
Mark Knecht posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:55:59 -0700: It seems right now that a simple emerge sync is causing xruns on this system implying to me some underlying problem with either hard drive activity or networking. since the hard drive is SATA and the

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: kernel.org vs. Gentoo-64 bit kernels (xruns)

2005-09-20 Thread Marco Matthies
Mark Knecht wrote: xruns are a term specific to the Jack server (jack-audio-connection-kit) that tell us whether we've had and overrun or an underrun. It's would be off topic to go deeply into how Jack operates when talking to sound cards, but take it to mean something bad has happened with

Re: [gentoo-amd64] unsubscribe

2005-09-20 Thread felix
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 05:58:32PM -0700, Brandon M. Heimbigner wrote: unsubscribe Here's how to unsubscribe: First, ask your Internet Provider to mail you an Unsubscribing Kit. Then follow these directions. The kit will most likely be the standard no-fault type. Depending on requirements,

Re: [gentoo-amd64] kernel.org vs. Gentoo-64 bit kernels (xruns)

2005-09-20 Thread Billy Holmes
Mark Knecht wrote: Thanks. Yes, I've run ck-sources a few times in the past but not had when you run with ck-sources, others have found it's best to use SCHED_ISO rather than SCHED_NORM (ck was patched with ISO support) - which is like real time scheduling for users processes. From what I

Re: [gentoo-amd64] kernel.org vs. Gentoo-64 bit kernels (xruns)

2005-09-20 Thread Daniel Gryniewicz
On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 09:58 -0400, Billy Holmes wrote: Mark Knecht wrote: Thanks. Yes, I've run ck-sources a few times in the past but not had when you run with ck-sources, others have found it's best to use SCHED_ISO rather than SCHED_NORM (ck was patched with ISO support) - which is

[gentoo-amd64] 2005.0/no-multilib profile fails

2005-09-20 Thread Matthew Daubenspeck
I am trying to change my profile to the new 2005.0 as per: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/amd64/howtos/index.xml?part=1chap=1 I am using the no-multilib instructions, and it still fails: # ln -s /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/amd64/2005.0/no-multilib /etc/make.profile # emerge -uv

Re: [gentoo-amd64] kernel.org vs. Gentoo-64 bit kernels (xruns)

2005-09-20 Thread Billy Holmes
Mark Knecht wrote: None the less, when recording in Ardour I'll be doing a reasonable amount of disk I/O. Not so much bandwitch - probably never more than 5-10MB/S on large recordings, but still it's a large number of audio files and therefore more disk seeking, etc., so I'll want the whole

Re: [gentoo-amd64] kernel.org vs. Gentoo-64 bit kernels (xruns)

2005-09-20 Thread Daniel Gryniewicz
On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 09:04 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote: On 9/20/05, Daniel Gryniewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 09:58 -0400, Billy Holmes wrote: Mark Knecht wrote: Thanks. Yes, I've run ck-sources a few times in the past but not had when you run with ck-sources,

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: kernel.org vs. Gentoo-64 bit kernels (xruns)

2005-09-20 Thread Paul de Vrieze
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 14:25, Mark Knecht wrote: On 9/20/05, Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not familiar with the term xrun, so this may be entirely off the wall, but have you confirmed the hard drive is running DMA? If your chipset or SATA drivers are wrong, and your hard drive

Re: [gentoo-amd64] kernel.org vs. Gentoo-64 bit kernels (xruns)

2005-09-20 Thread Paul de Vrieze
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 19:47, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: I do this: alias emerge='sudo schedtool -B -e /usr/bin/emerge' Obviously the sudo is unnecessary if you're root. You can use similar aliases to run things as SCHED_ISO, which I do for mplayer, for example. Or, more easilly, set

Re: [gentoo-amd64] kernel.org vs. Gentoo-64 bit kernels (xruns)

2005-09-20 Thread Paul de Vrieze
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 18:01, Mark Knecht wrote: On 9/20/05, Billy Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mark Knecht wrote: Thanks. Yes, I've run ck-sources a few times in the past but not had when you run with ck-sources, others have found it's best to use SCHED_ISO rather than

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: kernel.org vs. Gentoo-64 bit kernels (xruns)

2005-09-20 Thread Mark Knecht
On 9/20/05, Paul de Vrieze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday 20 September 2005 14:25, Mark Knecht wrote: On 9/20/05, Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not familiar with the term xrun, so this may be entirely off the wall, but have you confirmed the hard drive is running DMA? If your

Re: [gentoo-amd64] kernel.org vs. Gentoo-64 bit kernels (xruns)

2005-09-20 Thread Tres Melton
On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 20:23 +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote: On Tuesday 20 September 2005 19:47, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: I do this: alias emerge='sudo schedtool -B -e /usr/bin/emerge' Obviously the sudo is unnecessary if you're root. You can use similar aliases to run things as

Re: [gentoo-amd64] 2005.0/no-multilib profile fails

2005-09-20 Thread Tres Melton
On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 11:43 -0400, Matthew Daubenspeck wrote: I am trying to change my profile to the new 2005.0 as per: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/amd64/howtos/index.xml?part=1chap=1 I am using the no-multilib instructions, and it still fails: # ln -s

[gentoo-amd64] [Slightly OT] hard lock - AMD64/ck-sources/schedtool/qjackctl

2005-09-20 Thread Mark Knecht
Hi, This is AMD64, but more likely it's me doing something wrong. I'm posting this here as this list suggested I look at schedtool for running SCHED_FIFO on my jackd processes, so I tried it. Clamitous results! I'm guessing about how to run it so I tried like the example on the man page for