Duncan skrev:
For those using modular-x, has anyone run into bug 121394 [1], window
corruption if CFLAGS include -fweb?
I guess this is a gcc 4.0 only bug. -fweb is broken in gcc 4.0 and also
causes bad performance regressions in many cases. xorg-xserver is
probably not the only affected
Simon Strandman posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:07:24 +0100:
Duncan skrev:
For those using modular-x, has anyone run into bug 121394 [1], window
corruption if CFLAGS include -fweb?
I guess this is a gcc 4.0 only bug. -fweb is broken in gcc 4.0 and also
Guy Harrison posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:26:16 +:
On Monday 13 Feb 2006 00:40, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Monday 13 February 2006 01:02, Guy Harrison wrote:
I am hoping for some hints on how to repopulate the startbar
automatically. Failing
Gavin Seddon wrote:
From reading these posts I have sorted out
'other' issues that are off list. Namely [...] creating a
partition for /usr/portage to 'aid' fragmentation.
I did that some time ago in a simple-minded fashion, but I've had to revise
my layout somewhat. I had an ext3 partition
I did that some time ago in a simple-minded fashion, but I've had to revise
my layout somewhat. I had an ext3 partition solely for /usr/portage, and it
was mounted on that node, but every emerge --sync deleted the /lost+found
directory. I don't know how serious that is, but of course no-one
Duncan wrote:
John Myers posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Wed, 08 Feb 2006 18:49:54 -0800:
x86_64 does not require frame pointers for debugging, so
-fomit-frame-pointer is enabled with -O
/Click/. THAT'S the reason I hadn't removed the potentially redundant
Brett Johnson wrote:
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 07:38:21AM -0700, Duncan wrote:
Peter Humphrey posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below,
on Sat, 11 Feb 2006 14:31:15 +:
David Fellows wrote:
I haven't used it, but tellico seems exactly what you want. It is described
in Linux Journal April
Nuitari wrote:
chattr +i /lost+found
would have probably worked
Good idea. As usual, I didn't think of it myself. Thanks anyway.
--
Rgds
Peter
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
I got old nice game Railroad Tycoon 2 and after installing made entry in
Kmenu with this command:
linux32 /usr/local/games/RT2/rt2
As you see its installed in /usr/local/games bypassing portage. Seems
everything works fine, sound and graphics, however, is it right way to launch
32 binary on
On 2/14/06, P.V.Anthony [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is apparently available in SUSE Linux 10.1beta3 or higher:
Hmm, I may just have to put my extra (blank) hard drive to use with
SUSE =10.1beta3... I've been toying with compiling it myself, but a
precompiled binary of it would be better right
On Wednesday 15 February 2006 03:17, Nuitari wrote:
I got old nice game Railroad Tycoon 2 and after installing made entry in
Kmenu with this command:
linux32 /usr/local/games/RT2/rt2
As you see its installed in /usr/local/games bypassing portage. Seems
everything works fine, sound and
Peter Humphrey posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below,
on Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:27:49 +:
Gavin Seddon wrote:
From reading these posts I have sorted out 'other' issues that are off
list. Namely [...] creating a partition for /usr/portage to 'aid'
fragmentation.
I did that some time
Alt-Enter doesnt work, and cant find it should, isnt it only for winOS?
I run rt2 in fullscreen, and it appears --windowed option doesnt work, just
tried. Next time game will lock ill try X kill or Ctrl+Alt+Esc if it isnt the
same, but meanwhile i found where to turn off that amaroK OSD thingy,
Guy Harrison posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:59:23 +:
If I can trouble you with a further question, within kickerrc
[Kmenu] where do I go next to find its entries?
The question doesn't quite parse as is, here, so I'm forced to make some
assumptions about
Martins Steinbergs posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below,
on Wed, 15 Feb 2006 04:01:41 +0200:
Can you explain why linux32 part isnt needed?
The linux32 part is simply a convenient way to fool apps into believing
the kernel and all is 32-bit. It's needed for compiling stuff and the
like,
Simon Stelling posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:37:30 +0100:
Duncan wrote:
Is -fPIC gcc-version sensitive?
It might be that some version of gcc prints a warning when configure
performs a test to decide whether -fPIC is a supported flag or not and
another
16 matches
Mail list logo
