Beso wrote:
why the hell the devs don't revbump an important package like gcc?!
this policy is really damaging:
There is no such policy, rather the opposite. The gcc maintainer was
simply out of line when he did not revbump the gcc ebuild on this change.
--
Ben de Groot
Gentoo Linux
of portage-2.1.6 (or 2.2_rc17) from someone with a
functioning ~amd64 system. (I myself am stuck on ~x86 for the moment.)
--
Ben de Groot
Gentoo Linux developer (lxde, media, desktop-misc)
Gentoo Linux Release Engineering PR liaison
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED
you can choose either one and get the exact same optimizations.
I hope this clears a few things up.
Cheers,
--
Ben de Groot
Gentoo Linux developer (lxde, media, desktop-misc)
Gentoo Linux Release Engineering PR liaison
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Haney wrote:
| Beso wrote:
| 2008/4/3, Mark Haney [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| After going a few months without using it, I decided to unmerge avidemux
| as part of my regular maintenance. Of course, 5 minutes after I do
| that, I
| suddenly need it.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Haney wrote:
| Stream #0.1(und): Audio: mp4a / 0x6134706D, 44100 Hz, stereo
|
| Unsupported codec (id=86018) for input stream #0.1
|
| I thought at first it was the video codec causing the problem, but it's
| not, it's the audio. I rather
