a script file:
#!/bin/bash
#
# Written and Copyright by Tres Melton (2005)
#
# Run a 32 bit program from 64 bit space
#
# If parameters given then execute the command instead of /bin/bash
# If no parameters then create a new 32 bit chroot jail shell
#
JAIL_DIR="/mnt/sdb3/Ge
ng the server.
Just had a couple of issues with that. :)
> --
> Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
> "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
> and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in
> http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html
>
>
Cheers Duncan,
--
Tres Melton
IRC & Gentoo: RiverRat
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
gt; M13 9PL, U.K.
Perhaps being a member of the wheel group is required.
--
Tres Melton
IRC & Gentoo: RiverRat
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
> Flash really should die. Or get a 64-bit version. Whichever is
> easier ;)
Oh please let it be death! The WWW is so much more pleasant without it.
--
Tres Melton
IRC & Gentoo: RiverRat
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
6.8.2-r6) works like a charm.
>
A bit dated but doing the same thing:
http://cambuca.ldhs.cetuc.puc-rio.br/multiuser/
--
Tres Melton
IRC & Gentoo: RiverRat
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
; Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
> "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
> and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in
> http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html
>
>
--
Tres Melton
IRC & Gentoo: RiverRat
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
it) so, "emerge -C
apache" and then remove the config files (or move them out of the way)
and then re-emerge it.
--
Tres Melton
IRC & Gentoo: RiverRat
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ters to be used for addr arithmetic and the pic stuff uses
the rbx register for other address stuff. The -fPIC option should only
be enabled by the ebuild author and never placed in your CFLAGS. If the
problem persists without the un-advised cflag then please file a bug
report and include me in the CC list.
--
Tres Melton
IRC & Gentoo: RiverRat
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
using. :p There
are other issues between the two processors (alot) but that is the most
common problem.
--
Tres Melton
IRC & Gentoo: RiverRat
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
get you back to where you
are functional. Just use the newest 2005.1 stage on the install.
> Thanks,
> Scott
--
Tres Melton
IRC & Gentoo: RiverRat
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
lain text for this mailing list.
>
New to open-source mailing lists? Most of them have people that hate
HTML mail (me for one) and thus it is pretty much standard to say no.
This actually becomes really important when you start sending patches in
the email has HTML usually screws them up.
--
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 22:40 +0200, Marco Matthies wrote:
> Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
>
> > I got 0x2abc1000 on my machine, i would be interested to know what
>
> > 0x2abc3000
> >
>
> Thanks for the reply.
And now that I know what addresses to
, but I eventually got
> it going and I'm happy I did.
>
>I tried ck-sources but didn't have any luck. Too bad as I like the
> email list. Very helpful folks.
>
>Too bad we don't have an official or even semi-official
> gentoo-rt-audio-sources project for kernels like this/
>
> Cheers,
> Mark
>
--
Tres Melton
IRC & Gentoo: RiverRat
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
n, however, in all cases.
>
> --
> Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
> "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
> and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in
> http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.
e case. It is changing so that /usr/lib points to the
default bitness of the host. So /usr/lib has 64bit
libraries, /usr/lib64 is a pointer to /usr/lib and /usr/lib32 is where
the 32 bit stuff should go.
--
Tres Melton
IRC & Gentoo: RiverRat
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
usted the symbolic links as outlined in the
instructions? If /lib32 or /usr/lib32 are not links you will get that
message.
> --
> Matthew Daubenspeck
> http://www.oddprocess.org
>
> Gentoo Linux 2.6.12-gentoo-r6 x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 2800+
> 11:41:53 up 58 d
't that backwards? The lowest priority is 20. The highest is
-19. You have to be root for any priority < 0.
> Paul
>
--
Tres Melton
IRC & Gentoo: RiverRat
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
> I appreaciate the info a lot. Thanks!
No problem.
> Cheers,
> Mark
>
--
Tres Melton
IRC & Gentoo: RiverRat
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 10:31 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> Tres Melton posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
> below, on Sat, 17 Sep 2005 19:43:48 -0600:
> > I'm still getting mail on this list but the volume seems to have gone down
> > considerably since I used to particip
o determine if the problems are possibly because of
> this new NForce4 chipset but that may take awhile.
>
> Thanks in advance for any info you might provide.
>
> Cheers,
> Mark
>
--
Tres Melton
IRC & Gentoo: RiverRat
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
to have gone
down considerably since I used to participate daily. I don't know what
the deal is. The traffic on #gentoo-amd64 seems to have increased
recently though. :)
Regards,
--
Tres Melton
IRC & Gentoo: RiverRat
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
/devrel/quiz/ebuild-quiz.txt
and the AMD64 team is always looking for more ATs. Then you can keyword
them yourself (after a probationary period).
--
Tres Melton
IRC & Gentoo: RiverRat
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
http://sh.nu/download/ebuilds/mplayer/ . Basically you
need to use win32codecs and they are only 32 bits so must be linked
against a 32 bit binary.
Regards,
--
Tres Melton
IRC & Gentoo: RiverRat
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
interview.html
>
Somewhere in this thread is the mention of ssh to run a 32 bit program.
That is a poor solution in my opinion. The suggestion was made to mount
the /tmp dirs and other things and I do this at boot. Further I have
written a program that will allow any user (approved by the sudoers fi
I have been working on that darned libcom_err.so.3 error that has
plagued many of us (including those w/ x86). I have just posted
something to the forum and wanted to post it here to to get reactions
from x86-64 users on my speculation in the last paragraph. Anyway:
--
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 22:18 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> Tres Melton wrote:
> > Yesterday I had a situation that required me to run revdep-rebuild, and
> > after a number of runs + some manual emerges I got:
> >
> > thor:/home/tres # rm /root/.revdep-rebuild*.?_* ; re
On Sat, 2005-07-09 at 14:05 +0200, Jonathan Schaeffer wrote:
> I didnt' give any news about my configuration problems because of
> other probs now solved :)
> So, I have something new :
> $ cat /proc/scsi/scsi
> Attached devices:
> Host: scsi1 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
> Vendor: ATA Model:
On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 11:57 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> I hope I'm not hijacking this thread ;-)but can anyone tell me
> what creates /dev/dsp in the first place? On this newly reinstalled
> Xfce4 system it doesn't exist, even though the kernel sound modules do
> and have been loaded.
I
On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 20:36 +1200, Joel Wiramu Pauling wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I did an emerge deep world last night, and noticed it pick up new kde
> ebuilds. This morning KDE and almost any KDE app (with the exception of
> LICQ's kde-gui plugin... which doesn't really use the framework very
> much)
Yesterday I had a situation that required me to run revdep-rebuild, and
after a number of runs + some manual emerges I got:
thor:/home/tres # rm /root/.revdep-rebuild*.?_* ; revdep-rebuild
rm: cannot remove `/root/.revdep-rebuild*.?_*': No such file or
directory
Checking reverse dependencies...
P
On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 21:55 +0100, Ian Hastie wrote:
> > Doesn't Eterm count as CLI?
>
> I may be being picky, but no it doesn't. bash, ksh, csh, etc. are CLIs.
> Eterm, or any other term, is as the name suggest a terminal emulator.
> You can just as easily run any text based programme on it ins
On Sun, 2005-06-26 at 05:09 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> > If I'm going to go that far down then I'm going to reboot. For me, once
> > I leave X there is no reason NOT to reboot. I know servers are totally
> > different beast though.
>
> Well, I too spend most of my time in X (KDE), but am quite comfo
On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 07:21 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> It seems you have potentially two issues, (1) a misunderstanding of the
> world file and what it actually tracks, and (2) a screwed up portage
> database (not the world file, but /var/db/portage/*). Note the
> POTENTIALLY in there, it could be th
A couple of questions on bugzilla please.
Q. How do you watch a bug of interest if it is not yours? Get email
notification on that bug? I hate having to track it down each time or
create a custom search for a single bug.
Q. How can you make the "My Bugs" link show all of my bugs, eve
On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 10:56 +, Caitlin Ross wrote:
> On 25/06/05 00:21:33, Tres Melton wrote:
>
> > Another question, at what point is a reboot required? I know
> > that emerging a new kernel requires a reboot (at least to use it) but
> > what about some of t
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 17:21 -0600, Tres Melton wrote:
> Good afternoon gentlemen,
>
> I have a few questions regarding portage and/or emerge that I would
> appreciate some help answering. To update my system I:
>
> esync
> emerge -avDut --newuse world
>
>
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 17:13 -0700, Anthony Gorecki wrote:
> On Friday, June 24, 2005 5:01 pm, Tres Melton wrote:
> > mirroring the data on each Opteron
>
> This I don't understand. How can you mirror filesystem data on a CPU? The
> motherboard (for the desktop machine) wou
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 16:47 -0700, Anthony Gorecki wrote:
> Do you happen to know when the filesystem will be reworked to function
> correctly on AMD64 systems?
Sorry, I don't.
> I've been considering an upgrade to a pair of
> dual core Opterons, and I'd like to be able to use Reiser4 over In
On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 00:26 +0100, Alastair Murray wrote:
> Well, I'll give a brief answer to this one: This isn't an issue. In the
> cases were registers are used to pass variables between function the ABI
> defines which registers should be used. Not that registers are always used.
>
> Basical
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 16:15 -0700, Anthony Gorecki wrote:
> On Friday, June 24, 2005 10:23 am, Andrew Watson wrote:
> > Is it worth it in terms of performence and reliability?
> > also, is it safe to run all partitions including / on reiser4.
>
> Reiser4 does not presently work with AMD64 architec
Good afternoon gentlemen,
I have a few questions regarding portage and/or emerge that I would
appreciate some help answering. To update my system I:
esync
emerge -avDut --newuse world
Yesterday I did an esync and a number of packages came up one of which
was sudo. I could swea
On Thu, 2005-06-23 at 18:10 +0200, Xavier Neys wrote:
> Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> > On Thursday 23 June 2005 17:38, Francisco Perez wrote:
> >
> >>I've had my AMD 64 box running for a few days, but I just noticed that
> >>at the login screen it says "Welcome to GOETHALS.UNKNOWN_DOMAIN".
> >>Right b
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 05:31 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> I was hoping to avoid having to look that up, as I'd seen it when
> browsing my system, but had forgotten the specifics. =8^) However, since
> you asked, and in the spirit of "teach a man to fish and he eats for
> a lifetime..." here's how I go
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 12:31 -0600, Tres Melton wrote:
> Bug report submitted.
Bad link
> > > > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/amd64/2005.0-upgrade-amd64.xml
Good link
> > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/amd64/howtos/index.xml?part=1&chap=1
50 minutes from bug submi
Bug report submitted.
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 19:48 +0200, Francesco Talamona wrote:
> On Monday 20 June 2005 10:05, Tres Melton wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 07:08 +0200, Francesco Talamona wrote:
> > > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/amd64/2005.0-upgrade-amd64.xml
>
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 07:08 +0200, Francesco Talamona wrote:
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/amd64/2005.0-upgrade-amd64.xml
>
But that link isn't working for me.
--
Tres
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 17:50 +0200, Francesco Talamona wrote:
> On Sunday 19 June 2005 17:22, Tres Melton wrote:
> > On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 16:55 +0200, Francesco Talamona wrote:
> > > That's great! I didn't touch /usr/lib!
> >
> > So you are saying that your
On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 16:55 +0200, Francesco Talamona wrote:
> > I don't know. If it were me I'd dig into the source. For
> > instance /etc/make.profile/profile.bashrc contains:
> You do know! I feel this is the answer!
> > # Make sure they updated to 2005.0 properly
> > if [ -L /lib32 -o -L /us
On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 15:16 +0200, Francesco Talamona wrote:
> Now I'm back online :-)
> But I think I need some more help...
>
> I booted a 2005.0 install cd, made two chroot, first as if was going to
> do a fresh install, second with the hosed system.
>
> Then quickpkg-ed whole sane system, mo
On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 05:31 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> So, I can appreciate the heavy irony that it was MS that basically shoved
> me off their platform, giving me no other choice, and Linux that allowed
> me to stay legal. How can I ever thank MS enough! (Actually, the decade
> invested and thousands
On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 16:57 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> The thing with the upgrade is that there are several elements to multilib,
> including portage (sandbox), glibc, and gcc. If you have a perfectly
> working multilib setup before the upgrade, with all the elements in place,
> it shouldn't be a big
On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 08:59 +0200, Francesco Talamona wrote:
> So I decided to take back to a stable 2004.3 before attempting upgrade.
> Basically I made more or less step 1 to 3 Tres suggests (I read your
> emails only this morning.); but in the end glibc was locked, no more no
> less as gcc was
On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 11:39 +0200, Francesco Talamona wrote:
> I'm trying to upgrade my profile from 2004.3 following this doc:
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/amd64/howtos/index.xml?part=1&chap=1
>
> The system is up to date, and everything (but opera, acroread and
>
> openoffice-bin) w
On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 11:57 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> * Hijacking a thread is when you reply to a message, erasing the subject
> and replacing it with your own. The references header still contains the
> references to the old thread, so a decent client will still display it as
> part of the old threa
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 23:14 -0500, Francisco Perez wrote:
It does distinguish but SATA is an ATA drive and therefore an hd?. A
true SCSI drive would be sd?.
> Thanks Ali!
> I didn't catch that in the documentation, but as soon as I changed it,
> it worked right way. :)
>
> Frank
> Ali Naddaf w
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 05:47 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a Tyan K8S-Pro (2882) which has 1 PCI slot and 4 open slots on
> two PCI-X buses. It also has a crummy graphics chip which I want to
> replace with a PCI card I have. but that single PCI slot is occupied
> by a USB/Firewire board
I'm trying to port plextor-tools.ebuild from ~x86 to ~amd64 and have
encountered a problem. The Makefile sets
CFLAGS=`gnome-config --cflags applets` $(SCFLAGS)
but "gnome-config --cflags applets" returns "Unknown library `applets'"
even though I have gnome-base/gnome-applets installed.
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 23:38 +0100, Steffen Jobbagy-Felso wrote:
> You should normally use a portage overlay for this, a nice howto is here:
> http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Installing_3rd_Party_Ebuilds
>
> Hope that helps :)
It did. I'd done that before but forgot about it this time around.
Anyway
uncan; I know it was a private email
but there is nothing personal in here.)
> On Friday 10 June 2005 20:46, Tres Melton posted as excerpted below:
> > Duncan,
> >
> > Can I ask a quick question? There is a package, plextor-tools, that is
> > marked as unstable on
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 03:45 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> I think you got that reversed, he's trying to turn the USE flag ON, not
> off. It's already off in the profile.
>
> So... what he'd probably need to do (assuming it works, I'm not sure but
> I think it will), would be to echo "firebird", instead o
On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 04:50 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> Tres Melton posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
> below, on Sat, 04 Jun 2005 02:58:37 -0600:
>
> > It's these little nuggets that get me to read all of your posts Duncan.
> >
> > Something else that&#
On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 10:45 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> Suggestion for the future, and for everyone else on the list as well.
> Take a look at the portage buildpkg FEATURE. Basically, what it does is
> automatically creates a binary package from the files in the fake-install
> dir after the compile an
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 16:36 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> Tres Melton posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
> below, on Sun, 29 May 2005 16:11:52 -0600:
>
> > The problem with that point of view is that there is no way to use MMX/SSE
> > from C (except for Enlightenment'
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 07:26 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> Hmm... I get a "Could not open file " dialog, here in Konqueror.
> Since you say it works, there,
I didn't say it worked here. I said it started to but I keep it locally
stored. I assume you found the document since you provided a different
li
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 03:46 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> Steffen Jobbagy-Felso posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> excerpted below, on Sun, 29 May 2005 09:32:12 +0100:
>
> > Tres Melton wrote:
> >> I remember hearing about an old Honeywell machine that used a 30 bit
> &
On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 08:11 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> Tres Melton posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
> below, on Fri, 27 May 2005 03:34:42 -0600:
>
> > For more information please see: http://old.x86-64.org/abi.pdf. The
> OK, those bookmarked to read later. BTW, time
On Sat, 2005-05-28 at 08:46 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi
>
> Apologies if this is too off-topic. I'm running Gentoo on an
> AMD64 desktop with an nVidia 6800 GPU. I'm using the system to
> experiment with programming the GPU to do non-graphics
> calculations.
>
> I'm going to need to do
On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 22:36 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Gentlemen:
>
> The last assembly code I wrote was on a 6809 %). Oh I did some 8088 in
> dos debug.
>
> Thanks for the urls pointing to the problems and standards for porting
> this rather amazing chip to Linux.
>
> My favorite hin
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 19:59 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> Tres Melton posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
> below, on Thu, 26 May 2005 16:17:39 -0600:
>
> > I always enjoy reading your comments as they are very thorough.
>
> Of course, that means on occasion I'm &qu
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 01:50 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> Alex Bennee posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below,
> on Thu, 26 May 2005 01:14:57 +0100:
>
> > I seem to be tripping up on the GIMP. The compiler is failing with a
> > internal compile error. Has anyone else seen anything like this?
> >
>
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 23:57 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> >Is there a corresponding flash-bin to go along with it? I installed
> >firefox-bin but flash is still missing.
> >
> >
> emerge netscape-flash
>
I re-emerged it yet again. No joy.
--
Tres
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sat, 2005-05-14 at 22:24 -0400, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 04:01 +0200, Luigi Pinna wrote:
> > Hello!
> > I want to compile firefox as 32 bit program to use flash...
> > I tried to emerge it with the command
> > CFLAGS="-m32" emerge firefox
> > but it doesn't work and I can
Does anyone know how to use gdb to view the mmx registers in hex in a
running program? If I ask for "info all-registers" I get:
xmm4 {f = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}}
{f = {4.48415509e-44, 0, 0, 0}}
as you can see the hexidecimal representation is 0x0 for all four words.
I know that the
On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 15:16 +1000, Jason White wrote:
> What motherboard/chip set combinations are best supported in recent
> kernels under AMD64? I am thinking of Gigabyte or Asus boards, which seem to
> be the most readily available around here, with either nVidia or VIA
> chip sets.
>
> I do ca
does not start up. If I put an
> "echo $DISPLAY" at the end of the command, it prints a blank line.
>
> A shell script seems to behave differently than an interactive session.
>
> How do I reinitialize the environment in a shell script??
>
>
> On 4/20/05, Tres Me
Have you tried running the last su command without the '-' so that it
won't behave as a login shell (and reinitialize the environment)?
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 12:37 +1000, Robert S wrote:
> I am using a 32-bit chroot environment to run wine on my amd64 box. I
> am using sudo to allow members of th
There are two 2005.0 profiles. One with and one without. Perhaps I
wasn't clear in saying that I had to revert to 2004.3 and update
everything. Then I had to change my /etc/make.profile symbolic link and
add multilib to my USE and then re-update my system. Sorry for being
unclear.
On Sat, 2005-
4 + multilib
and sorry for any confusion I caused.
(further comments in excerpt below)
On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 22:20 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> Tres Melton posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
> below, on Thu, 14 Apr 2005 09:06:03 -0600:
>
...
> That's an unfortunate possibilit
Duncan,
The 2004.3 boot cd for AMD64 has a splash screen. Like you I prefer to
see my system bitch at my stupidity instead of just hang so I don't know
about the installed system.
Cheers,
Tres
On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 02:46 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> Gregory Symons posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpte
Duncan,
Thanks for the great explanation. For the first time I feel that I
have something more than a vague understanding of what is happening in
my new system. I do have one or two bones to pick though:
1) I believe that 2004.3 is 'deprecated' (not depreciated) since the
other day when
80 matches
Mail list logo
