Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: 32bit and 64 bit libs together on multilib

2005-04-14 Thread Tres Melton
Duncan, Thanks for the great explanation. For the first time I feel that I have something more than a vague understanding of what is happening in my new system. I do have one or two bones to pick though: 1) I believe that 2004.3 is 'deprecated' (not depreciated) since the other day when

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: fbsplash wierdness

2005-04-14 Thread Tres Melton
Duncan, The 2004.3 boot cd for AMD64 has a splash screen. Like you I prefer to see my system bitch at my stupidity instead of just hang so I don't know about the installed system. Cheers, Tres On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 02:46 -0700, Duncan wrote: > Gregory Symons posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpte

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: 32bit and 64 bit libs together on multilib

2005-04-15 Thread Tres Melton
4 + multilib and sorry for any confusion I caused. (further comments in excerpt below) On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 22:20 -0700, Duncan wrote: > Tres Melton posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted > below, on Thu, 14 Apr 2005 09:06:03 -0600: > ... > That's an unfortunate possibilit

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: 32bit and 64 bit libs together on multilib

2005-04-15 Thread Tres Melton
There are two 2005.0 profiles. One with and one without. Perhaps I wasn't clear in saying that I had to revert to 2004.3 and update everything. Then I had to change my /etc/make.profile symbolic link and add multilib to my USE and then re-update my system. Sorry for being unclear. On Sat, 2005-

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Where has my $DISPLAY gone?

2005-04-19 Thread Tres Melton
Have you tried running the last su command without the '-' so that it won't behave as a login shell (and reinitialize the environment)? On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 12:37 +1000, Robert S wrote: > I am using a 32-bit chroot environment to run wine on my amd64 box. I > am using sudo to allow members of th

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Where has my $DISPLAY gone?

2005-04-19 Thread Tres Melton
does not start up. If I put an > "echo $DISPLAY" at the end of the command, it prints a blank line. > > A shell script seems to behave differently than an interactive session. > > How do I reinitialize the environment in a shell script?? > > > On 4/20/05, Tres Me

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Motherboard/chip set recommendations for Gentoo/AMD64?

2005-05-07 Thread Tres Melton
On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 15:16 +1000, Jason White wrote: > What motherboard/chip set combinations are best supported in recent > kernels under AMD64? I am thinking of Gigabyte or Asus boards, which seem to > be the most readily available around here, with either nVidia or VIA > chip sets. > > I do ca

[gentoo-amd64] xmm registers & gdb

2005-05-09 Thread Tres Melton
Does anyone know how to use gdb to view the mmx registers in hex in a running program? If I ask for "info all-registers" I get: xmm4 {f = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}} {f = {4.48415509e-44, 0, 0, 0}} as you can see the hexidecimal representation is 0x0 for all four words. I know that the

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Firefox and 32bit

2005-05-17 Thread Tres Melton
On Sat, 2005-05-14 at 22:24 -0400, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: > On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 04:01 +0200, Luigi Pinna wrote: > > Hello! > > I want to compile firefox as 32 bit program to use flash... > > I tried to emerge it with the command > > CFLAGS="-m32" emerge firefox > > but it doesn't work and I can

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Firefox and 32bit

2005-05-17 Thread Tres Melton
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 23:57 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote: > >Is there a corresponding flash-bin to go along with it? I installed > >firefox-bin but flash is still missing. > > > > > emerge netscape-flash > I re-emerged it yet again. No joy. -- Tres -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Failed gimp compile

2005-05-26 Thread Tres Melton
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 01:50 -0700, Duncan wrote: > Alex Bennee posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, > on Thu, 26 May 2005 01:14:57 +0100: > > > I seem to be tripping up on the GIMP. The compiler is failing with a > > internal compile error. Has anyone else seen anything like this? > > >

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: Failed gimp compile

2005-05-27 Thread Tres Melton
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 19:59 -0700, Duncan wrote: > Tres Melton posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted > below, on Thu, 26 May 2005 16:17:39 -0600: > > > I always enjoy reading your comments as they are very thorough. > > Of course, that means on occasion I'm &qu

[gentoo-amd64] Re: Failed gimp compile

2005-05-28 Thread Tres Melton
On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 22:36 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Gentlemen: > > The last assembly code I wrote was on a 6809 %). Oh I did some 8088 in > dos debug. > > Thanks for the urls pointing to the problems and standards for porting > this rather amazing chip to Linux. > > My favorite hin

Re: [gentoo-amd64] [OT] AMD64 laptops?

2005-05-28 Thread Tres Melton
On Sat, 2005-05-28 at 08:46 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi > > Apologies if this is too off-topic. I'm running Gentoo on an > AMD64 desktop with an nVidia 6800 GPU. I'm using the system to > experiment with programming the GPU to do non-graphics > calculations. > > I'm going to need to do

[gentoo-amd64] USE flags (was Re: Failed gimp compile)

2005-05-28 Thread Tres Melton
On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 08:11 -0700, Duncan wrote: > Tres Melton posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted > below, on Fri, 27 May 2005 03:34:42 -0600: > > > For more information please see: http://old.x86-64.org/abi.pdf. The > OK, those bookmarked to read later. BTW, time

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: USE flags (was Re: Failed gimp compile)

2005-05-29 Thread Tres Melton
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 03:46 -0700, Duncan wrote: > Steffen Jobbagy-Felso posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > excerpted below, on Sun, 29 May 2005 09:32:12 +0100: > > > Tres Melton wrote: > >> I remember hearing about an old Honeywell machine that used a 30 bit > &

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: USE flags (was Re: Failed gimp compile)

2005-05-29 Thread Tres Melton
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 07:26 -0700, Duncan wrote: > Hmm... I get a "Could not open file " dialog, here in Konqueror. > Since you say it works, there, I didn't say it worked here. I said it started to but I keep it locally stored. I assume you found the document since you provided a different li

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: USE flags (was Re: Failed gimp compile)

2005-05-29 Thread Tres Melton
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 16:36 -0700, Duncan wrote: > Tres Melton posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted > below, on Sun, 29 May 2005 16:11:52 -0600: > > > The problem with that point of view is that there is no way to use MMX/SSE > > from C (except for Enlightenment'

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: gcc not compiling

2005-06-04 Thread Tres Melton
On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 10:45 -0700, Duncan wrote: > Suggestion for the future, and for everyone else on the list as well. > Take a look at the portage buildpkg FEATURE. Basically, what it does is > automatically creates a binary package from the files in the fake-install > dir after the compile an

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: gcc not compiling

2005-06-04 Thread Tres Melton
On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 04:50 -0700, Duncan wrote: > Tres Melton posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted > below, on Sat, 04 Jun 2005 02:58:37 -0600: > > > It's these little nuggets that get me to read all of your posts Duncan. > > > > Something else that&#

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: +firebird

2005-06-07 Thread Tres Melton
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 03:45 -0700, Duncan wrote: > I think you got that reversed, he's trying to turn the USE flag ON, not > off. It's already off in the profile. > > So... what he'd probably need to do (assuming it works, I'm not sure but > I think it will), would be to echo "firebird", instead o

[gentoo-amd64] Re: A quick portage question

2005-06-13 Thread Tres Melton
uncan; I know it was a private email but there is nothing personal in here.) > On Friday 10 June 2005 20:46, Tres Melton posted as excerpted below: > > Duncan, > > > > Can I ask a quick question? There is a package, plextor-tools, that is > > marked as unstable on

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: A quick portage question

2005-06-14 Thread Tres Melton
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 23:38 +0100, Steffen Jobbagy-Felso wrote: > You should normally use a portage overlay for this, a nice howto is here: > http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Installing_3rd_Party_Ebuilds > > Hope that helps :) It did. I'd done that before but forgot about it this time around. Anyway

[gentoo-amd64] Gnome-config question

2005-06-14 Thread Tres Melton
I'm trying to port plextor-tools.ebuild from ~x86 to ~amd64 and have encountered a problem. The Makefile sets CFLAGS=`gnome-config --cflags applets` $(SCFLAGS) but "gnome-config --cflags applets" returns "Unknown library `applets'" even though I have gnome-base/gnome-applets installed.

Re: [gentoo-amd64] PCI-X bus and PCI cards

2005-06-17 Thread Tres Melton
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 05:47 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have a Tyan K8S-Pro (2882) which has 1 PCI slot and 4 open slots on > two PCI-X buses. It also has a crummy graphics chip which I want to > replace with a PCI card I have. but that single PCI slot is occupied > by a USB/Firewire board

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Grub error when booting.

2005-06-17 Thread Tres Melton
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 23:14 -0500, Francisco Perez wrote: It does distinguish but SATA is an ATA drive and therefore an hd?. A true SCSI drive would be sd?. > Thanks Ali! > I didn't catch that in the documentation, but as soon as I changed it, > it worked right way. :) > > Frank > Ali Naddaf w

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Hijacking?

2005-06-18 Thread Tres Melton
On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 11:57 -0700, Duncan wrote: > * Hijacking a thread is when you reply to a message, erasing the subject > and replacing it with your own. The references header still contains the > references to the old thread, so a decent client will still display it as > part of the old threa

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Troubles switching to 2005.0

2005-06-18 Thread Tres Melton
On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 11:39 +0200, Francesco Talamona wrote: > I'm trying to upgrade my profile from 2004.3 following this doc: > > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/amd64/howtos/index.xml?part=1&chap=1 > > The system is up to date, and everything (but opera, acroread and > > openoffice-bin) w

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Troubles switching to 2005.0 - Follow up

2005-06-19 Thread Tres Melton
On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 08:59 +0200, Francesco Talamona wrote: > So I decided to take back to a stable 2004.3 before attempting upgrade. > Basically I made more or less step 1 to 3 Tres suggests (I read your > emails only this morning.); but in the end glibc was locked, no more no > less as gcc was

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Troubles switching to 2005.0

2005-06-19 Thread Tres Melton
On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 16:57 -0700, Duncan wrote: > The thing with the upgrade is that there are several elements to multilib, > including portage (sandbox), glibc, and gcc. If you have a perfectly > working multilib setup before the upgrade, with all the elements in place, > it shouldn't be a big

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: Troubles switching to 2005.0

2005-06-19 Thread Tres Melton
On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 05:31 -0700, Duncan wrote: > So, I can appreciate the heavy irony that it was MS that basically shoved > me off their platform, giving me no other choice, and Linux that allowed > me to stay legal. How can I ever thank MS enough! (Actually, the decade > invested and thousands

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Troubles switching to 2005.0 - Follow up

2005-06-19 Thread Tres Melton
On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 15:16 +0200, Francesco Talamona wrote: > Now I'm back online :-) > But I think I need some more help... > > I booted a 2005.0 install cd, made two chroot, first as if was going to > do a fresh install, second with the hosed system. > > Then quickpkg-ed whole sane system, mo

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Troubles switching to 2005.0 - Follow up

2005-06-19 Thread Tres Melton
On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 16:55 +0200, Francesco Talamona wrote: > > I don't know. If it were me I'd dig into the source. For > > instance /etc/make.profile/profile.bashrc contains: > You do know! I feel this is the answer! > > # Make sure they updated to 2005.0 properly > > if [ -L /lib32 -o -L /us

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Troubles switching to 2005.0 - Follow up

2005-06-19 Thread Tres Melton
On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 17:50 +0200, Francesco Talamona wrote: > On Sunday 19 June 2005 17:22, Tres Melton wrote: > > On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 16:55 +0200, Francesco Talamona wrote: > > > That's great! I didn't touch /usr/lib! > > > > So you are saying that your

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: gcc-3.4.4 build error 'failed with profiledbootstrap'

2005-06-20 Thread Tres Melton
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 07:08 +0200, Francesco Talamona wrote: > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/amd64/2005.0-upgrade-amd64.xml > But that link isn't working for me. -- Tres -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: gcc-3.4.4 build error 'failed with profiledbootstrap'

2005-06-20 Thread Tres Melton
Bug report submitted. On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 19:48 +0200, Francesco Talamona wrote: > On Monday 20 June 2005 10:05, Tres Melton wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 07:08 +0200, Francesco Talamona wrote: > > > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/amd64/2005.0-upgrade-amd64.xml >

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: gcc-3.4.4 build error 'failed with profiledbootstrap'

2005-06-20 Thread Tres Melton
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 12:31 -0600, Tres Melton wrote: > Bug report submitted. Bad link > > > > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/amd64/2005.0-upgrade-amd64.xml Good link > > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/amd64/howtos/index.xml?part=1&chap=1 50 minutes from bug submi

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: ACPI codes 80/81

2005-06-22 Thread Tres Melton
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 05:31 -0700, Duncan wrote: > I was hoping to avoid having to look that up, as I'd seen it when > browsing my system, but had forgotten the specifics. =8^) However, since > you asked, and in the spirit of "teach a man to fish and he eats for > a lifetime..." here's how I go

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Can't set FQDN

2005-06-23 Thread Tres Melton
On Thu, 2005-06-23 at 18:10 +0200, Xavier Neys wrote: > Paul de Vrieze wrote: > > On Thursday 23 June 2005 17:38, Francisco Perez wrote: > > > >>I've had my AMD 64 box running for a few days, but I just noticed that > >>at the login screen it says "Welcome to GOETHALS.UNKNOWN_DOMAIN". > >>Right b

[gentoo-amd64] portage/emerge and rebooting questions

2005-06-24 Thread Tres Melton
Good afternoon gentlemen, I have a few questions regarding portage and/or emerge that I would appreciate some help answering. To update my system I: esync emerge -avDut --newuse world Yesterday I did an esync and a number of packages came up one of which was sudo. I could swea

Re: [gentoo-amd64] reiser4 desktop - worth it?

2005-06-24 Thread Tres Melton
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 16:15 -0700, Anthony Gorecki wrote: > On Friday, June 24, 2005 10:23 am, Andrew Watson wrote: > > Is it worth it in terms of performence and reliability? > > also, is it safe to run all partitions including / on reiser4. > > Reiser4 does not presently work with AMD64 architec

Re: [gentoo-amd64] portage/emerge and rebooting questions

2005-06-24 Thread Tres Melton
On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 00:26 +0100, Alastair Murray wrote: > Well, I'll give a brief answer to this one: This isn't an issue. In the > cases were registers are used to pass variables between function the ABI > defines which registers should be used. Not that registers are always used. > > Basical

Re: [gentoo-amd64] reiser4 desktop - worth it?

2005-06-24 Thread Tres Melton
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 16:47 -0700, Anthony Gorecki wrote: > Do you happen to know when the filesystem will be reworked to function > correctly on AMD64 systems? Sorry, I don't. > I've been considering an upgrade to a pair of > dual core Opterons, and I'd like to be able to use Reiser4 over In

Re: [gentoo-amd64] reiser4 desktop - worth it?

2005-06-24 Thread Tres Melton
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 17:13 -0700, Anthony Gorecki wrote: > On Friday, June 24, 2005 5:01 pm, Tres Melton wrote: > > mirroring the data on each Opteron > > This I don't understand. How can you mirror filesystem data on a CPU? The > motherboard (for the desktop machine) wou

Re: [gentoo-amd64] portage/emerge and rebooting questions

2005-06-25 Thread Tres Melton
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 17:21 -0600, Tres Melton wrote: > Good afternoon gentlemen, > > I have a few questions regarding portage and/or emerge that I would > appreciate some help answering. To update my system I: > > esync > emerge -avDut --newuse world > >

Re: [gentoo-amd64] portage/emerge and rebooting questions

2005-06-25 Thread Tres Melton
On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 10:56 +, Caitlin Ross wrote: > On 25/06/05 00:21:33, Tres Melton wrote: > > > Another question, at what point is a reboot required? I know > > that emerging a new kernel requires a reboot (at least to use it) but > > what about some of t

[gentoo-amd64] bugzilla questions

2005-06-25 Thread Tres Melton
A couple of questions on bugzilla please. Q. How do you watch a bug of interest if it is not yours? Get email notification on that bug? I hate having to track it down each time or create a custom search for a single bug. Q. How can you make the "My Bugs" link show all of my bugs, eve

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: portage/emerge and rebooting questions

2005-06-25 Thread Tres Melton
On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 07:21 -0700, Duncan wrote: > It seems you have potentially two issues, (1) a misunderstanding of the > world file and what it actually tracks, and (2) a screwed up portage > database (not the world file, but /var/db/portage/*). Note the > POTENTIALLY in there, it could be th

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: portage/emerge and rebooting questions

2005-06-27 Thread Tres Melton
On Sun, 2005-06-26 at 05:09 -0700, Duncan wrote: > > If I'm going to go that far down then I'm going to reboot. For me, once > > I leave X there is no reason NOT to reboot. I know servers are totally > > different beast though. > > Well, I too spend most of my time in X (KDE), but am quite comfo

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: portage/emerge and rebooting questions

2005-06-27 Thread Tres Melton
On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 21:55 +0100, Ian Hastie wrote: > > Doesn't Eterm count as CLI? > > I may be being picky, but no it doesn't. bash, ksh, csh, etc. are CLIs. > Eterm, or any other term, is as the name suggest a terminal emulator. > You can just as easily run any text based programme on it ins

[gentoo-amd64] emerge + libraries

2005-07-05 Thread Tres Melton
Yesterday I had a situation that required me to run revdep-rebuild, and after a number of runs + some manual emerges I got: thor:/home/tres # rm /root/.revdep-rebuild*.?_* ; revdep-rebuild rm: cannot remove `/root/.revdep-rebuild*.?_*': No such file or directory Checking reverse dependencies... P

Re: [gentoo-amd64] emerge -deep world last night has broken kde

2005-07-07 Thread Tres Melton
On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 20:36 +1200, Joel Wiramu Pauling wrote: > Hi all, > > I did an emerge deep world last night, and noticed it pick up new kde > ebuilds. This morning KDE and almost any KDE app (with the exception of > LICQ's kde-gui plugin... which doesn't really use the framework very > much)

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: arts

2005-07-08 Thread Tres Melton
On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 11:57 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > I hope I'm not hijacking this thread ;-)but can anyone tell me > what creates /dev/dsp in the first place? On this newly reinstalled > Xfce4 system it doesn't exist, even though the kernel sound modules do > and have been loaded. I

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Internal Card Reader detection

2005-07-10 Thread Tres Melton
On Sat, 2005-07-09 at 14:05 +0200, Jonathan Schaeffer wrote: > I didnt' give any news about my configuration problems because of > other probs now solved :) > So, I have something new : > $ cat /proc/scsi/scsi > Attached devices: > Host: scsi1 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00 > Vendor: ATA Model:

Re: [gentoo-amd64] emerge + libraries

2005-07-12 Thread Tres Melton
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 22:18 -0700, Zac Medico wrote: > Tres Melton wrote: > > Yesterday I had a situation that required me to run revdep-rebuild, and > > after a number of runs + some manual emerges I got: > > > > thor:/home/tres # rm /root/.revdep-rebuild*.?_* ; re

[gentoo-amd64] AMD64 linking issues.

2005-07-14 Thread Tres Melton
I have been working on that darned libcom_err.so.3 error that has plagued many of us (including those w/ x86). I have just posted something to the forum and wanted to post it here to to get reactions from x86-64 users on my speculation in the last paragraph. Anyway: --

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Installing into a 32-bit chroot?

2005-09-06 Thread Tres Melton
interview.html > Somewhere in this thread is the mention of ssh to run a 32 bit program. That is a poor solution in my opinion. The suggestion was made to mount the /tmp dirs and other things and I do this at boot. Further I have written a program that will allow any user (approved by the sudoers fi

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Yahoo news video

2005-09-10 Thread Tres Melton
http://sh.nu/download/ebuilds/mplayer/ . Basically you need to use win32codecs and they are only 32 bits so must be linked against a 32 bit binary. Regards, -- Tres Melton IRC & Gentoo: RiverRat -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-amd64] please close bug 105520

2005-09-15 Thread Tres Melton
/devrel/quiz/ebuild-quiz.txt and the AMD64 team is always looking for more ATs. Then you can keyword them yourself (after a probationary period). -- Tres Melton IRC & Gentoo: RiverRat -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-amd64] sandbox failure

2005-09-17 Thread Tres Melton
to have gone down considerably since I used to participate daily. I don't know what the deal is. The traffic on #gentoo-amd64 seems to have increased recently though. :) Regards, -- Tres Melton IRC & Gentoo: RiverRat -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-amd64] kernel.org vs. Gentoo-64 bit kernels (xruns)

2005-09-19 Thread Tres Melton
o determine if the problems are possibly because of > this new NForce4 chipset but that may take awhile. > > Thanks in advance for any info you might provide. > > Cheers, > Mark > -- Tres Melton IRC & Gentoo: RiverRat -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: sandbox failure

2005-09-19 Thread Tres Melton
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 10:31 -0700, Duncan wrote: > Tres Melton posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted > below, on Sat, 17 Sep 2005 19:43:48 -0600: > > I'm still getting mail on this list but the volume seems to have gone down > > considerably since I used to particip

Re: [gentoo-amd64] kernel.org vs. Gentoo-64 bit kernels (xruns)

2005-09-19 Thread Tres Melton
> I appreaciate the info a lot. Thanks! No problem. > Cheers, > Mark > -- Tres Melton IRC & Gentoo: RiverRat -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-amd64] kernel.org vs. Gentoo-64 bit kernels (xruns)

2005-09-20 Thread Tres Melton
't that backwards? The lowest priority is 20. The highest is -19. You have to be root for any priority < 0. > Paul > -- Tres Melton IRC & Gentoo: RiverRat -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-amd64] 2005.0/no-multilib profile fails

2005-09-20 Thread Tres Melton
usted the symbolic links as outlined in the instructions? If /lib32 or /usr/lib32 are not links you will get that message. > -- > Matthew Daubenspeck > http://www.oddprocess.org > > Gentoo Linux 2.6.12-gentoo-r6 x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 2800+ > 11:41:53 up 58 d

Re: [gentoo-amd64] binary 32-bit libs, LDPATH questions

2005-09-26 Thread Tres Melton
e case. It is changing so that /usr/lib points to the default bitness of the host. So /usr/lib has 64bit libraries, /usr/lib64 is a pointer to /usr/lib and /usr/lib32 is where the 32 bit stuff should go. -- Tres Melton IRC & Gentoo: RiverRat -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: binary 32-bit libs, LDPATH questions

2005-09-27 Thread Tres Melton
n, however, in all cases. > > -- > Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. > "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- > and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in > http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.

Re: [gentoo-amd64] AMD64 - 2.6.14-rc2-rt7 - great for real time audio

2005-09-30 Thread Tres Melton
, but I eventually got > it going and I'm happy I did. > >I tried ck-sources but didn't have any luck. Too bad as I like the > email list. Very helpful folks. > >Too bad we don't have an official or even semi-official > gentoo-rt-audio-sources project for kernels like this/ > > Cheers, > Mark > -- Tres Melton IRC & Gentoo: RiverRat -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Questions about No Execute and security

2005-10-06 Thread Tres Melton
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 22:40 +0200, Marco Matthies wrote: > Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > > > I got 0x2abc1000 on my machine, i would be interested to know what > > > 0x2abc3000 > > > > Thanks for the reply. And now that I know what addresses to

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: Best Desktop Patchset for kernel

2005-10-06 Thread Tres Melton
lain text for this mailing list. > New to open-source mailing lists? Most of them have people that hate HTML mail (me for one) and thus it is pretty much standard to say no. This actually becomes really important when you start sending patches in the email has HTML usually screws them up. --

Re: [gentoo-amd64] System died going from 2005.0 to 2005.1

2005-10-08 Thread Tres Melton
get you back to where you are functional. Just use the newest 2005.1 stage on the install. > Thanks, > Scott -- Tres Melton IRC & Gentoo: RiverRat -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-amd64] ~amd64 vs. ~x86

2005-11-29 Thread Tres Melton
using. :p There are other issues between the two processors (alot) but that is the most common problem. -- Tres Melton IRC & Gentoo: RiverRat signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-amd64] bash compilation failed when linking

2005-11-29 Thread Tres Melton
ters to be used for addr arithmetic and the pic stuff uses the rbx register for other address stuff. The -fPIC option should only be enabled by the ebuild author and never placed in your CFLAGS. If the problem persists without the un-advised cflag then please file a bug report and include me in the CC list. -- Tres Melton IRC & Gentoo: RiverRat signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re emerge apache.

2005-11-29 Thread Tres Melton
it) so, "emerge -C apache" and then remove the config files (or move them out of the way) and then re-emerge it. -- Tres Melton IRC & Gentoo: RiverRat signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: ~amd64 vs. ~x86

2005-11-29 Thread Tres Melton
; Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. > "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- > and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in > http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html > > -- Tres Melton IRC & Gentoo: RiverRat signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Multiple X with multiple Keyboards

2005-11-30 Thread Tres Melton
6.8.2-r6) works like a charm. > A bit dated but doing the same thing: http://cambuca.ldhs.cetuc.puc-rio.br/multiuser/ -- Tres Melton IRC & Gentoo: RiverRat signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Google Video and firefox (not bin)

2005-11-30 Thread Tres Melton
> Flash really should die. Or get a 64-bit version. Whichever is > easier ;) Oh please let it be death! The WWW is so much more pleasant without it. -- Tres Melton IRC & Gentoo: RiverRat signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-amd64] kile wizard only works when root

2005-12-02 Thread Tres Melton
gt; M13 9PL, U.K. Perhaps being a member of the wheel group is required. -- Tres Melton IRC & Gentoo: RiverRat signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Recent clock problems

2006-02-15 Thread Tres Melton
ng the server. Just had a couple of issues with that. :) > -- > Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. > "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- > and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in > http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html > > Cheers Duncan, -- Tres Melton IRC & Gentoo: RiverRat signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-amd64] chrrot'ed environment not available to users

2006-03-29 Thread Tres Melton
a script file: #!/bin/bash # # Written and Copyright by Tres Melton (2005) # # Run a 32 bit program from 64 bit space # # If parameters given then execute the command instead of /bin/bash # If no parameters then create a new 32 bit chroot jail shell # JAIL_DIR="/mnt/sdb3/Ge