On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 22:34 +, Duncan wrote:
Vladimir G. Ivanovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun,
29 Oct 2006 10:31:34 -0800:
Yes, I am running ~amd64 (ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=amd64 ~amd64
in /etc/make.conf.) I also changed to the 2006.0 profile, although
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 03:16, Vladimir G. Ivanovic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Openoffice
build error (#2 to keep them in line)':
Any idea why all the
examples for changing a profile in the Gentoo Upgrading Guide have two
leading periods, as in:
ln -s ../usr
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 07:21 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 03:16, Vladimir G. Ivanovic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Openoffice
build error (#2 to keep them in line)':
Any idea why all the
examples for changing a profile
sean [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Sat, 28 Oct 2006 22:19:14 -0400:
Still learning (slowly as time and problems arise) what I need to do to
maintain the system.
After reading your post I went to work on how to update gcc. Completed
that earlier today then
sean [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Sat, 28 Oct 2006 22:25:09 -0400:
Duncan wrote:
The addition of $CATEGORY in $WORKDIR is very new to portage. You are
probably running ~amd64 and have a portage with it. Sean will be
running an older portage (maybe latest
On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 12:55 +, Duncan wrote:
What I was suggesting was that you are probably at the newest stable,
while I and presumably Vladimir are running newest ~amd64.
Yes, I am running ~amd64 (ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=amd64 ~amd64
in /etc/make.conf.) I also changed to the 2006.0 profile,
Vladimir G. Ivanovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun,
29 Oct 2006 10:31:34 -0800:
Yes, I am running ~amd64 (ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=amd64 ~amd64
in /etc/make.conf.) I also changed to the 2006.0 profile, although I've
forgotten how I did that.
FWIW, I update
Duncan wrote:
Vladimir G. Ivanovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri,
27 Oct 2006 13:25:43 -0700:
On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 15:58 -0400, sean wrote:
ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making
/var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.4/work/
Interesting. I don't know if
Vladimir G. Ivanovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri,
27 Oct 2006 13:25:43 -0700:
On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 15:58 -0400, sean wrote:
ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making
/var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.4/work/
Interesting. I don't know if it makes a
Jan Jitse Venselaar wrote:
On Wednesday 19 July 2006 09:19, PaulNM wrote:
For posterity, since my AMD64X2 was not on earlier:
Optimus ~ # emerge -p openoffice
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy openoffice
Γιώργος Αβραμίδης posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 15 Nov
2005 12:04:54 +0200:
I did USE=-java emerge openoffice-bin because i had some problems with
java,
emerged just fine.
But when I try to run ooffice it says
/usr/lib32/openoffice/program/soffice.bin: symbol
Chris Smart posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below,
on Tue, 08 Nov 2005 18:16:06 +1100:
Dmitri Pogosyan wrote:
The claim is amd64 compilation is planned for 2.0.2
cheers, for some reason I thought you could compile it on an amd64 arch
but not as an actual 64bit app (ie in 32bit mode
sean posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 05
Nov 2005 14:36:42 -0500:
Looking in the openoffice-bin directory I see a listing for
openoffice-bin-2.0.0.ebuild and it does have the amd64 listed as a keyword.
However, whenever I do an emerge openoffice-bin the build process
Olivier Crête posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:00:10 -0400:
On Thu, 2005-20-10 at 21:35 -0700, Yann Ramin wrote:
I've noticed this too, haven't figured out a proper solution to this.
I've been using OO.o v2 on my Ubuntu laptop because of it. Version 2 is
a
14 matches
Mail list logo
