"Mark Knecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Thu, 14 Sep 2006 07:15:42 -0700:
> I'm just curious whether anyone besides me is noticing their machine
> feeling somewhat sluggish since doing the gcc-4.1 upgrade? Mine seems ot
> be using a lot of memory. Alt-tabbin
On 9/14/06, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm just curious whether anyone besides me is noticing their
machine feeling somewhat sluggish since doing the gcc-4.1 upgrade?
I noticed this morning that MythTV's frontend program is often using
90% CPU when viewed in top.
It never
"Mark Knecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Thu, 14 Sep 2006 17:43:19 -0700:
>Now, you are very adept at this. You're explanations make sense to
> the level I've considered them. (Not very far right now...) Main
> questions:
Adept, perhaps, but don't take
"Mark Knecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Fri, 15 Sep 2006 11:06:47 -0700:
> On 9/14/06, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>I'm just curious whether anyone besides me is noticing their
>> machine feeling somewhat sluggish since doing the gcc-
Peter Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 23 Sep
2006 14:39:11 +:
> Which model of Opteron are your CPUs? I have a feeling they differ from my
> 246s, and I've been wondering how I ought to tune your helpfully explained
> flags to suit my box.
I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duncan wrote:
Hmm - no -ftree-vectorize? Care to comment on that? I hear that it can
be buggy with a few packages, but I'm guessing it is worth having in
there in general.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Usi
On 9/14/06, Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Mark Knecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Thu, 14 Sep 2006 07:15:42 -0700:
> I'm just curious whether anyone besides me is noticing their machine
> feeling somewhat sluggish since doing the gcc-4.1 upgrade? Mine
On 9/14/06, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/14/06, Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> "Mark Knecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted>
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted> below, on Thu, 14 Sep 2006 07:15:42 -0700:2) What about building the kernel? How do the standardmake && make modules_install
co
On Thursday 14 September 2006 20:08, Duncan wrote:
> Here's my CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS:
...etc.
Which model of Opteron are your CPUs? I have a feeling they differ from my
246s, and I've been wondering how I ought to tune your helpfully explained
flags to suit my box.
--
Rgds
Peter
--
gentoo-amd64@g
On Saturday 23 September 2006 19:52, Duncan wrote:
> However, the only difference (CFLAGS wise) that I'm aware of for the AMD
> dual-cores is that they now incorporate SSE3, while my old 242s and I
> presume your 246s don't.
Nope. SSE and SSE2, but not SSE3. According to /proc/cpuinfo, that is.
On Saturday 23 September 2006 16:21, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Nope. SSE and SSE2, but not SSE3. According to /proc/cpuinfo, that is.
The flag in cpuinfo is pni for "Prescott New Instructions".
Cheers,
Jason
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
On Saturday 23 September 2006 17:21, Peter Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: gcc 4.1 upgrade - bad desktop
interactivity anyone?':
> On Saturday 23 September 2006 19:52, Duncan wrote:
> > However, the only difference (CFLAGS wise) that I&#
12 matches
Mail list logo
